Cargando…

Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center

BACKGROUND: Although an increasing number of treatments have become available for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP‐NETs), there remains little consensus on treatment sequence and its impact on health care resource use (HRU). We sought to describe treatment pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalbert, Jessica J., Casciano, Roman, Meng, Jie, Brais, Lauren K., Pulgar, Sonia J., Berthon, Anthony, Dinet, Jerome, Kulke, Matthew H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0691
_version_ 1783522748300001280
author Jalbert, Jessica J.
Casciano, Roman
Meng, Jie
Brais, Lauren K.
Pulgar, Sonia J.
Berthon, Anthony
Dinet, Jerome
Kulke, Matthew H.
author_facet Jalbert, Jessica J.
Casciano, Roman
Meng, Jie
Brais, Lauren K.
Pulgar, Sonia J.
Berthon, Anthony
Dinet, Jerome
Kulke, Matthew H.
author_sort Jalbert, Jessica J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although an increasing number of treatments have become available for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP‐NETs), there remains little consensus on treatment sequence and its impact on health care resource use (HRU). We sought to describe treatment patterns and HRU, in a cohort of patients with metastatic GEP‐NETs treated at a tertiary referral center in the U.S. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with a well‐differentiated, metastatic GEP‐NET evaluated at Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute between July 2003 and May 2015. For these patients, we describe the sequence of treatment regimens received for their disease, together with associated HRU. RESULTS: We identified 682 patients with advanced GEP‐NETs. Of these patients, 597 (87.0%) initiated ≥1 treatment over the follow‐up period. The mean age at diagnosis was 58.5 years, 50.2% were men, and 94.0% were white. A total of 83.1% initiated a somatostatin analog (SSA) as their first‐line treatment, with 55% and 31% of patients continuing with second‐ and third‐line therapies. A total of 31.2% of patients with SSAs underwent dose escalation to above standard dose. In this setting, patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were more commonly treated with cytotoxic regimens than other NET tumor types and also had higher HRU. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that, at a tertiary referral center, patients with advanced NETs commonly received multiple courses of treatments. Our data suggest a clear preference for use of SSAs as a first‐line treatment for patients with advanced NETs, with SSAs commonly escalated and continued throughout the course of treatment in combination with other regimens. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The current study demonstrates the common use of somatostatin analog as a first‐line therapy for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as the incorporation of multiple different treatment regimens in the treatment course of patients with this disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71604042020-04-20 Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center Jalbert, Jessica J. Casciano, Roman Meng, Jie Brais, Lauren K. Pulgar, Sonia J. Berthon, Anthony Dinet, Jerome Kulke, Matthew H. Oncologist Endocrinology BACKGROUND: Although an increasing number of treatments have become available for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP‐NETs), there remains little consensus on treatment sequence and its impact on health care resource use (HRU). We sought to describe treatment patterns and HRU, in a cohort of patients with metastatic GEP‐NETs treated at a tertiary referral center in the U.S. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with a well‐differentiated, metastatic GEP‐NET evaluated at Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute between July 2003 and May 2015. For these patients, we describe the sequence of treatment regimens received for their disease, together with associated HRU. RESULTS: We identified 682 patients with advanced GEP‐NETs. Of these patients, 597 (87.0%) initiated ≥1 treatment over the follow‐up period. The mean age at diagnosis was 58.5 years, 50.2% were men, and 94.0% were white. A total of 83.1% initiated a somatostatin analog (SSA) as their first‐line treatment, with 55% and 31% of patients continuing with second‐ and third‐line therapies. A total of 31.2% of patients with SSAs underwent dose escalation to above standard dose. In this setting, patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were more commonly treated with cytotoxic regimens than other NET tumor types and also had higher HRU. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that, at a tertiary referral center, patients with advanced NETs commonly received multiple courses of treatments. Our data suggest a clear preference for use of SSAs as a first‐line treatment for patients with advanced NETs, with SSAs commonly escalated and continued throughout the course of treatment in combination with other regimens. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The current study demonstrates the common use of somatostatin analog as a first‐line therapy for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as the incorporation of multiple different treatment regimens in the treatment course of patients with this disease. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-01-30 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7160404/ /pubmed/31999024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0691 Text en © 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Jalbert, Jessica J.
Casciano, Roman
Meng, Jie
Brais, Lauren K.
Pulgar, Sonia J.
Berthon, Anthony
Dinet, Jerome
Kulke, Matthew H.
Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center
title Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_full Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_fullStr Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_short Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Use Among Patients with Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated at a Tertiary Referral Center
title_sort treatment patterns and health resource use among patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated at a tertiary referral center
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0691
work_keys_str_mv AT jalbertjessicaj treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT cascianoroman treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT mengjie treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT braislaurenk treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT pulgarsoniaj treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT berthonanthony treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT dinetjerome treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter
AT kulkematthewh treatmentpatternsandhealthresourceuseamongpatientswithmetastaticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumorstreatedatatertiaryreferralcenter