Cargando…
Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock
AIMS: Urgent revascularization is the mainstay of treatment in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim was to investigate the association of angiographic results with 90‐day mortality. Procedural complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were also examin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12637 |
_version_ | 1783522758736478208 |
---|---|
author | Sabell, Tuija Banaszewski, Marek Lassus, Johan Nieminen, Markku S. Tolppanen, Heli Jäntti, Toni Kataja, Anu Hongisto, Mari Køber, Lars Sionis, Alessandro Parissis, John Tarvasmäki, Tuukka Harjola, Veli‐Pekka Jurkko, Raija |
author_facet | Sabell, Tuija Banaszewski, Marek Lassus, Johan Nieminen, Markku S. Tolppanen, Heli Jäntti, Toni Kataja, Anu Hongisto, Mari Køber, Lars Sionis, Alessandro Parissis, John Tarvasmäki, Tuukka Harjola, Veli‐Pekka Jurkko, Raija |
author_sort | Sabell, Tuija |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Urgent revascularization is the mainstay of treatment in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim was to investigate the association of angiographic results with 90‐day mortality. Procedural complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were also examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: This CardShock (NCT01374867) substudy included 158 patients with ACS aetiology and data on coronary angiography and complications during PCI procedure. Survival analysis was conducted with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Median age was 67 ± 11 years, and 77% were men. During 90‐day follow‐up, 66 (42%) patients died. Patients with one‐vessel disease (n = 49) had lower mortality than patients with two‐vessel (n = 59) or three‐vessel (n = 50) disease (25% vs. 48% vs. 52%, P = 0.011). Successful revascularization [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow 3 post‐PCI) was achieved more often in survivors than non‐survivors (81% vs. 60%, P = 0.019). The median symptom‐to‐balloon time was 340 (196–660) minutes, with no difference between survivors and non‐survivors. In multivariable mortality analysis, multivessel disease (HR 2.59, CI(95%) 1.29–5.18) and TIMI flow <3 post‐PCI (HR 2.41, CI(95%) 1.4–4.15) were associated with 90‐day mortality. Procedural PCI complications were recorded in 51 (35%) patients, arrhythmic complications being the most common (n = 32, 63%). The incidence of complications was similar between survivors and non‐survivors (31% vs. 42%, P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel disease is associated with worse survival in ACS‐related CS. In patients undergoing PCI, arrhythmic complications were common, but not associated with excess mortality. Successful revascularization of the IRA had positive effect on outcome despite delay from symptom onset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7160464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71604642020-04-20 Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock Sabell, Tuija Banaszewski, Marek Lassus, Johan Nieminen, Markku S. Tolppanen, Heli Jäntti, Toni Kataja, Anu Hongisto, Mari Køber, Lars Sionis, Alessandro Parissis, John Tarvasmäki, Tuukka Harjola, Veli‐Pekka Jurkko, Raija ESC Heart Fail Short Communications AIMS: Urgent revascularization is the mainstay of treatment in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim was to investigate the association of angiographic results with 90‐day mortality. Procedural complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were also examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: This CardShock (NCT01374867) substudy included 158 patients with ACS aetiology and data on coronary angiography and complications during PCI procedure. Survival analysis was conducted with Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Median age was 67 ± 11 years, and 77% were men. During 90‐day follow‐up, 66 (42%) patients died. Patients with one‐vessel disease (n = 49) had lower mortality than patients with two‐vessel (n = 59) or three‐vessel (n = 50) disease (25% vs. 48% vs. 52%, P = 0.011). Successful revascularization [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow 3 post‐PCI) was achieved more often in survivors than non‐survivors (81% vs. 60%, P = 0.019). The median symptom‐to‐balloon time was 340 (196–660) minutes, with no difference between survivors and non‐survivors. In multivariable mortality analysis, multivessel disease (HR 2.59, CI(95%) 1.29–5.18) and TIMI flow <3 post‐PCI (HR 2.41, CI(95%) 1.4–4.15) were associated with 90‐day mortality. Procedural PCI complications were recorded in 51 (35%) patients, arrhythmic complications being the most common (n = 32, 63%). The incidence of complications was similar between survivors and non‐survivors (31% vs. 42%, P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel disease is associated with worse survival in ACS‐related CS. In patients undergoing PCI, arrhythmic complications were common, but not associated with excess mortality. Successful revascularization of the IRA had positive effect on outcome despite delay from symptom onset. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7160464/ /pubmed/32163675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12637 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Short Communications Sabell, Tuija Banaszewski, Marek Lassus, Johan Nieminen, Markku S. Tolppanen, Heli Jäntti, Toni Kataja, Anu Hongisto, Mari Køber, Lars Sionis, Alessandro Parissis, John Tarvasmäki, Tuukka Harjola, Veli‐Pekka Jurkko, Raija Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock |
title | Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock |
title_full | Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock |
title_fullStr | Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock |
title_short | Prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock |
title_sort | prognostic impact of angiographic findings, procedural success, and timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock |
topic | Short Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabelltuija prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT banaszewskimarek prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT lassusjohan prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT nieminenmarkkus prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT tolppanenheli prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT janttitoni prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT katajaanu prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT hongistomari prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT køberlars prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT sionisalessandro prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT parissisjohn prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT tarvasmakituukka prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT harjolavelipekka prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock AT jurkkoraija prognosticimpactofangiographicfindingsproceduralsuccessandtimingofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionincardiogenicshock |