Cargando…
Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
Currently, the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the cornerstone of the classification of patients with heart failure (HF). The mid‐range LVEF (HFmrEF) category was identified in an attempt to uncover specific characteristics of these patients. So far, the analysis of trials...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12586 |
_version_ | 1783522763472896000 |
---|---|
author | Branca, Luca Sbolli, Marco Metra, Marco Fudim, Marat |
author_facet | Branca, Luca Sbolli, Marco Metra, Marco Fudim, Marat |
author_sort | Branca, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Currently, the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the cornerstone of the classification of patients with heart failure (HF). The mid‐range LVEF (HFmrEF) category was identified in an attempt to uncover specific characteristics of these patients. So far, the analysis of trials, registries, and observational studies have demonstrated that patients with mid‐range LVEF belong to a patient cohort with generally intermediate clinical profile as compared with other groups but with a remarkable variety of intrinsic phenotypes. This is due to the limitations of LVEF as the sole criterion to categorize patients with HF and characterize their prognosis, above all when it is >40%. To better define the HFmrEF phenotype, it is reasonable to consider other parameters, such as LVEF changes over time, HF aetiology, co‐morbidities, and other imaging parameters. A multiparametric evaluation may contextualize a patient with HFmrEF in a more defined phenotype with a specific prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7160484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71604842020-04-20 Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines Branca, Luca Sbolli, Marco Metra, Marco Fudim, Marat ESC Heart Fail Reviews Currently, the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the cornerstone of the classification of patients with heart failure (HF). The mid‐range LVEF (HFmrEF) category was identified in an attempt to uncover specific characteristics of these patients. So far, the analysis of trials, registries, and observational studies have demonstrated that patients with mid‐range LVEF belong to a patient cohort with generally intermediate clinical profile as compared with other groups but with a remarkable variety of intrinsic phenotypes. This is due to the limitations of LVEF as the sole criterion to categorize patients with HF and characterize their prognosis, above all when it is >40%. To better define the HFmrEF phenotype, it is reasonable to consider other parameters, such as LVEF changes over time, HF aetiology, co‐morbidities, and other imaging parameters. A multiparametric evaluation may contextualize a patient with HFmrEF in a more defined phenotype with a specific prognosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7160484/ /pubmed/32239646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12586 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Branca, Luca Sbolli, Marco Metra, Marco Fudim, Marat Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines |
title | Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines |
title_full | Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines |
title_fullStr | Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines |
title_short | Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines |
title_sort | heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of heart failure by european society of cardiology guidelines |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brancaluca heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines AT sbollimarco heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines AT metramarco heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines AT fudimmarat heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines |