Cargando…

Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines

Currently, the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the cornerstone of the classification of patients with heart failure (HF). The mid‐range LVEF (HFmrEF) category was identified in an attempt to uncover specific characteristics of these patients. So far, the analysis of trials...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Branca, Luca, Sbolli, Marco, Metra, Marco, Fudim, Marat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12586
_version_ 1783522763472896000
author Branca, Luca
Sbolli, Marco
Metra, Marco
Fudim, Marat
author_facet Branca, Luca
Sbolli, Marco
Metra, Marco
Fudim, Marat
author_sort Branca, Luca
collection PubMed
description Currently, the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the cornerstone of the classification of patients with heart failure (HF). The mid‐range LVEF (HFmrEF) category was identified in an attempt to uncover specific characteristics of these patients. So far, the analysis of trials, registries, and observational studies have demonstrated that patients with mid‐range LVEF belong to a patient cohort with generally intermediate clinical profile as compared with other groups but with a remarkable variety of intrinsic phenotypes. This is due to the limitations of LVEF as the sole criterion to categorize patients with HF and characterize their prognosis, above all when it is >40%. To better define the HFmrEF phenotype, it is reasonable to consider other parameters, such as LVEF changes over time, HF aetiology, co‐morbidities, and other imaging parameters. A multiparametric evaluation may contextualize a patient with HFmrEF in a more defined phenotype with a specific prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71604842020-04-20 Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines Branca, Luca Sbolli, Marco Metra, Marco Fudim, Marat ESC Heart Fail Reviews Currently, the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the cornerstone of the classification of patients with heart failure (HF). The mid‐range LVEF (HFmrEF) category was identified in an attempt to uncover specific characteristics of these patients. So far, the analysis of trials, registries, and observational studies have demonstrated that patients with mid‐range LVEF belong to a patient cohort with generally intermediate clinical profile as compared with other groups but with a remarkable variety of intrinsic phenotypes. This is due to the limitations of LVEF as the sole criterion to categorize patients with HF and characterize their prognosis, above all when it is >40%. To better define the HFmrEF phenotype, it is reasonable to consider other parameters, such as LVEF changes over time, HF aetiology, co‐morbidities, and other imaging parameters. A multiparametric evaluation may contextualize a patient with HFmrEF in a more defined phenotype with a specific prognosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7160484/ /pubmed/32239646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12586 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Branca, Luca
Sbolli, Marco
Metra, Marco
Fudim, Marat
Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
title Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
title_full Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
title_fullStr Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
title_short Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of Heart Failure by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
title_sort heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction: pro and cons of the new classification of heart failure by european society of cardiology guidelines
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12586
work_keys_str_mv AT brancaluca heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines
AT sbollimarco heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines
AT metramarco heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines
AT fudimmarat heartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionproandconsofthenewclassificationofheartfailurebyeuropeansocietyofcardiologyguidelines