Cargando…

Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease?

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline usually coexists with motor impairment in PD. Multitask settings provide appropriate measures to evaluate the complex interaction between motor and cognitive impairments. The main objective was to analyze which concurrent task, i. e., motor or hybrid motor-cognitive,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereiro, Arturo X., Resúa, Bea, Facal, David, Cancela-Carral, José María
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32322384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2189084
_version_ 1783522811348779008
author Pereiro, Arturo X.
Resúa, Bea
Facal, David
Cancela-Carral, José María
author_facet Pereiro, Arturo X.
Resúa, Bea
Facal, David
Cancela-Carral, José María
author_sort Pereiro, Arturo X.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline usually coexists with motor impairment in PD. Multitask settings provide appropriate measures to evaluate the complex interaction between motor and cognitive impairments. The main objective was to analyze which concurrent task, i. e., motor or hybrid motor-cognitive, in combination with a cognitive task better differentiates between PD patients with mild and moderate levels of disease. METHODS: Thirty-seven individuals (19 male and 18 female) with idiopathic PD performed dual and triple tasks combining a cognitive task (phonemic fluency) with motor (pedaling) and/or cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) tasks. Mild and moderate disability PD groups were specified considering the Hoehn and Yahr scale. Mixed ANOVA analyses for each of the concurrent task were carried out to test differences between the single and dual or triple condition performances comparing the low and high PD disability groups. Supplementary mixed ANCOVA analysis was performed considering the cognitive status as the covariate. RESULTS: The only significant differences between disability PD groups were found for performances in the cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) task, both in dual and triple conditions. Our results showed a better performance for the mild rather than for the moderate disability group in the single condition task and a significant decline of the mild disability group in the dual and triple condition when compared to the levels of those shown by the moderate disability group. The group-condition interaction remained significant when the cognitive status was statistically controlled. CONCLUSION: The hybrid of motor-cognitive task combining with a cognitive task (i. e., fluency) successfully differentiated between mild and moderate PD patients in the context of dual and triple multitask sets even when the cognitive status was statistically controlled. Our results highlight the importance of jointly measuring the complex interplay between motor and cognitive skills in PD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71607272020-04-22 Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease? Pereiro, Arturo X. Resúa, Bea Facal, David Cancela-Carral, José María Parkinsons Dis Research Article INTRODUCTION: Cognitive decline usually coexists with motor impairment in PD. Multitask settings provide appropriate measures to evaluate the complex interaction between motor and cognitive impairments. The main objective was to analyze which concurrent task, i. e., motor or hybrid motor-cognitive, in combination with a cognitive task better differentiates between PD patients with mild and moderate levels of disease. METHODS: Thirty-seven individuals (19 male and 18 female) with idiopathic PD performed dual and triple tasks combining a cognitive task (phonemic fluency) with motor (pedaling) and/or cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) tasks. Mild and moderate disability PD groups were specified considering the Hoehn and Yahr scale. Mixed ANOVA analyses for each of the concurrent task were carried out to test differences between the single and dual or triple condition performances comparing the low and high PD disability groups. Supplementary mixed ANCOVA analysis was performed considering the cognitive status as the covariate. RESULTS: The only significant differences between disability PD groups were found for performances in the cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) task, both in dual and triple conditions. Our results showed a better performance for the mild rather than for the moderate disability group in the single condition task and a significant decline of the mild disability group in the dual and triple condition when compared to the levels of those shown by the moderate disability group. The group-condition interaction remained significant when the cognitive status was statistically controlled. CONCLUSION: The hybrid of motor-cognitive task combining with a cognitive task (i. e., fluency) successfully differentiated between mild and moderate PD patients in the context of dual and triple multitask sets even when the cognitive status was statistically controlled. Our results highlight the importance of jointly measuring the complex interplay between motor and cognitive skills in PD. Hindawi 2020-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7160727/ /pubmed/32322384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2189084 Text en Copyright © 2020 Arturo X. Pereiro et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pereiro, Arturo X.
Resúa, Bea
Facal, David
Cancela-Carral, José María
Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease?
title Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease?
title_full Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease?
title_fullStr Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease?
title_full_unstemmed Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease?
title_short Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson's Disease?
title_sort combining a cognitive concurrent task with a motor or motor-cognitive task: which is better to differentiate levels of affectation in parkinson's disease?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32322384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2189084
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiroarturox combiningacognitiveconcurrenttaskwithamotorormotorcognitivetaskwhichisbettertodifferentiatelevelsofaffectationinparkinsonsdisease
AT resuabea combiningacognitiveconcurrenttaskwithamotorormotorcognitivetaskwhichisbettertodifferentiatelevelsofaffectationinparkinsonsdisease
AT facaldavid combiningacognitiveconcurrenttaskwithamotorormotorcognitivetaskwhichisbettertodifferentiatelevelsofaffectationinparkinsonsdisease
AT cancelacarraljosemaria combiningacognitiveconcurrenttaskwithamotorormotorcognitivetaskwhichisbettertodifferentiatelevelsofaffectationinparkinsonsdisease