Cargando…

Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging

BACKGROUND: Understanding how to create and deliver effective physical activity (PA) messages for and to various population subgroups may play a role in increasing population PA levels. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of what is known about PA messaging and highlight key research ga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, Chloë, Baker, Graham, Mutrie, Nanette, Niven, Ailsa, Kelly, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00954-3
_version_ 1783522862878949376
author Williamson, Chloë
Baker, Graham
Mutrie, Nanette
Niven, Ailsa
Kelly, Paul
author_facet Williamson, Chloë
Baker, Graham
Mutrie, Nanette
Niven, Ailsa
Kelly, Paul
author_sort Williamson, Chloë
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding how to create and deliver effective physical activity (PA) messages for and to various population subgroups may play a role in increasing population PA levels. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of what is known about PA messaging and highlight key research gaps. METHODS: We followed a 5-stage protocol proposed by Arksey & O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews checklist. Stage 1: research questions were identified. Stage 2: we identified relevant studies by searching electronic databases, contacting existing networks and hand searching reference lists. Stage 3: studies were screened in Covidence™ software. Stage 4: study data were extracted and charted. Stage 5: findings from included studies were collated, summarised and reported in two ways: (1) a descriptive numerical analysis providing insight into extent, nature and distribution of the included studies, and (2) a narrative summary summarizing the evidence reviewed organised by messaging concepts and by population subgroup. RESULTS: A total of 9525 references were imported into Covidence™ for screening. Of these, 123 studies were included in final analysis. We found that PA messaging evidence is complex and multidimensional in nature, with numerous concepts to consider when creating or evaluating messages. The extent to which these different PA messaging concepts have been researched is variable. Where research has accumulated and evidence is consistent, it supports the following: (1) PA messages should be framed positively and highlight short-term outcomes specifically relating to social and mental health, (2) message content should be tailored or targeted to intended recipient(s), and (3) when developing messages, formative research, psychological theory and/or social marketing principles should be used. CONCLUSION: While it is unlikely to address global inactivity on its own, PA messaging may play a valuable role improving population PA levels. However, it is a complex and multidimensional concept and greater understanding is still needed. We present a synthesis of the existing evidence, highlighting key areas where evidence has accumulated and where gaps lie, as well as recommendations for PA messaging to different population subgroups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7160981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71609812020-04-22 Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging Williamson, Chloë Baker, Graham Mutrie, Nanette Niven, Ailsa Kelly, Paul Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: Understanding how to create and deliver effective physical activity (PA) messages for and to various population subgroups may play a role in increasing population PA levels. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of what is known about PA messaging and highlight key research gaps. METHODS: We followed a 5-stage protocol proposed by Arksey & O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews checklist. Stage 1: research questions were identified. Stage 2: we identified relevant studies by searching electronic databases, contacting existing networks and hand searching reference lists. Stage 3: studies were screened in Covidence™ software. Stage 4: study data were extracted and charted. Stage 5: findings from included studies were collated, summarised and reported in two ways: (1) a descriptive numerical analysis providing insight into extent, nature and distribution of the included studies, and (2) a narrative summary summarizing the evidence reviewed organised by messaging concepts and by population subgroup. RESULTS: A total of 9525 references were imported into Covidence™ for screening. Of these, 123 studies were included in final analysis. We found that PA messaging evidence is complex and multidimensional in nature, with numerous concepts to consider when creating or evaluating messages. The extent to which these different PA messaging concepts have been researched is variable. Where research has accumulated and evidence is consistent, it supports the following: (1) PA messages should be framed positively and highlight short-term outcomes specifically relating to social and mental health, (2) message content should be tailored or targeted to intended recipient(s), and (3) when developing messages, formative research, psychological theory and/or social marketing principles should be used. CONCLUSION: While it is unlikely to address global inactivity on its own, PA messaging may play a valuable role improving population PA levels. However, it is a complex and multidimensional concept and greater understanding is still needed. We present a synthesis of the existing evidence, highlighting key areas where evidence has accumulated and where gaps lie, as well as recommendations for PA messaging to different population subgroups. BioMed Central 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7160981/ /pubmed/32295613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00954-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Williamson, Chloë
Baker, Graham
Mutrie, Nanette
Niven, Ailsa
Kelly, Paul
Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging
title Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging
title_full Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging
title_fullStr Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging
title_full_unstemmed Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging
title_short Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging
title_sort get the message? a scoping review of physical activity messaging
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7160981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00954-3
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsonchloe getthemessageascopingreviewofphysicalactivitymessaging
AT bakergraham getthemessageascopingreviewofphysicalactivitymessaging
AT mutrienanette getthemessageascopingreviewofphysicalactivitymessaging
AT nivenailsa getthemessageascopingreviewofphysicalactivitymessaging
AT kellypaul getthemessageascopingreviewofphysicalactivitymessaging