Cargando…

Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Agitation is common in geriatric patients with cognitive impairment, e.g. in persons with dementia (PWD), who are admitted to an emergency department (ED). It might be a first sign of upcoming delirium and is associated with a higher risk of an unfavorable clinical course. Hence, monitor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroll, Lisa, Böhning, Nikolaus, Müßigbrodt, Heidi, Stahl, Maria, Halkin, Pavel, Liehr, Birgit, Grunow, Christine, Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana, Freise, Christian, Hopfenmüller, Werner, Friesdorf, Wolfgang, Jockers-Scherübl, Maria, Somasundaram, Rajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5
_version_ 1783522901913239552
author Kroll, Lisa
Böhning, Nikolaus
Müßigbrodt, Heidi
Stahl, Maria
Halkin, Pavel
Liehr, Birgit
Grunow, Christine
Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana
Freise, Christian
Hopfenmüller, Werner
Friesdorf, Wolfgang
Jockers-Scherübl, Maria
Somasundaram, Rajan
author_facet Kroll, Lisa
Böhning, Nikolaus
Müßigbrodt, Heidi
Stahl, Maria
Halkin, Pavel
Liehr, Birgit
Grunow, Christine
Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana
Freise, Christian
Hopfenmüller, Werner
Friesdorf, Wolfgang
Jockers-Scherübl, Maria
Somasundaram, Rajan
author_sort Kroll, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Agitation is common in geriatric patients with cognitive impairment, e.g. in persons with dementia (PWD), who are admitted to an emergency department (ED). It might be a first sign of upcoming delirium and is associated with a higher risk of an unfavorable clinical course. Hence, monitoring of vital signs and enhanced movement as indicators of upcoming agitation is essential in these patients during their stay in the ED. Since PWD rarely tolerate fixed monitoring devices, a novel developed non-contact monitoring system (NCMSys) might represent an appropriate alternative. Aim of this feasibility study was to test the validity of a NCMSys and of the tent-like “Charité Dome” (ChD), aimed to shelter PWD from the busy ED environment. Furthermore, effects of the ChD on wellbeing and agitation of PWD were investigated. METHODS: Both devices were attached to patient’s bed. Tests on technical validity and safety issues of NCMSys and ChD were performed at the iDoc institute with six healthy volunteers. A feasibility study evaluating the reliability of the NCMSys with and without the ChD was performed in the real-life setting of an ED and on a geriatric-gerontopsychiatric ward. 19 patients were included, ten males and nine females; mean age: 77.4 (55–93) years of which 14 were PWD. PWD inclusion criteria were age ≥ 55 years, a dementia diagnosis and a written consent (by patients or by a custodian). Exclusion criteria were acute life-threatening situations and a missing consent. RESULTS: Measurements of heart rate, changes in movement and sound emissions by the NCMSys were valid, whereas patient movements affected respiratory rate measurements. The ChD did not impact patients’ vital signs or movements in our study setting. However, 53% of the PWD (7/13) and most of the patients without dementia (4/5) benefited from its use regarding their agitation and overall wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this feasibility study encourage a future controlled clinical trial in geriatric ED patients, including PWD, to further evaluate if our concept of non-contact measurement of vital signs and movement combined with the “Charité Dome” helps to prevent upcoming agitation in this vulnerable patient group in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ICTRP: “Charité-Dome-Study - DRKS00014737” (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7161155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71611552020-04-22 Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study Kroll, Lisa Böhning, Nikolaus Müßigbrodt, Heidi Stahl, Maria Halkin, Pavel Liehr, Birgit Grunow, Christine Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana Freise, Christian Hopfenmüller, Werner Friesdorf, Wolfgang Jockers-Scherübl, Maria Somasundaram, Rajan BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Agitation is common in geriatric patients with cognitive impairment, e.g. in persons with dementia (PWD), who are admitted to an emergency department (ED). It might be a first sign of upcoming delirium and is associated with a higher risk of an unfavorable clinical course. Hence, monitoring of vital signs and enhanced movement as indicators of upcoming agitation is essential in these patients during their stay in the ED. Since PWD rarely tolerate fixed monitoring devices, a novel developed non-contact monitoring system (NCMSys) might represent an appropriate alternative. Aim of this feasibility study was to test the validity of a NCMSys and of the tent-like “Charité Dome” (ChD), aimed to shelter PWD from the busy ED environment. Furthermore, effects of the ChD on wellbeing and agitation of PWD were investigated. METHODS: Both devices were attached to patient’s bed. Tests on technical validity and safety issues of NCMSys and ChD were performed at the iDoc institute with six healthy volunteers. A feasibility study evaluating the reliability of the NCMSys with and without the ChD was performed in the real-life setting of an ED and on a geriatric-gerontopsychiatric ward. 19 patients were included, ten males and nine females; mean age: 77.4 (55–93) years of which 14 were PWD. PWD inclusion criteria were age ≥ 55 years, a dementia diagnosis and a written consent (by patients or by a custodian). Exclusion criteria were acute life-threatening situations and a missing consent. RESULTS: Measurements of heart rate, changes in movement and sound emissions by the NCMSys were valid, whereas patient movements affected respiratory rate measurements. The ChD did not impact patients’ vital signs or movements in our study setting. However, 53% of the PWD (7/13) and most of the patients without dementia (4/5) benefited from its use regarding their agitation and overall wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this feasibility study encourage a future controlled clinical trial in geriatric ED patients, including PWD, to further evaluate if our concept of non-contact measurement of vital signs and movement combined with the “Charité Dome” helps to prevent upcoming agitation in this vulnerable patient group in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ICTRP: “Charité-Dome-Study - DRKS00014737” (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7161155/ /pubmed/32295567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kroll, Lisa
Böhning, Nikolaus
Müßigbrodt, Heidi
Stahl, Maria
Halkin, Pavel
Liehr, Birgit
Grunow, Christine
Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana
Freise, Christian
Hopfenmüller, Werner
Friesdorf, Wolfgang
Jockers-Scherübl, Maria
Somasundaram, Rajan
Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
title Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
title_full Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
title_short Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
title_sort non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5
work_keys_str_mv AT krolllisa noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT bohningnikolaus noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT mußigbrodtheidi noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT stahlmaria noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT halkinpavel noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT liehrbirgit noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT grunowchristine noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT kujumdshievabohningborjana noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT freisechristian noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT hopfenmullerwerner noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT friesdorfwolfgang noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT jockersscherublmaria noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy
AT somasundaramrajan noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy