Cargando…
Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Agitation is common in geriatric patients with cognitive impairment, e.g. in persons with dementia (PWD), who are admitted to an emergency department (ED). It might be a first sign of upcoming delirium and is associated with a higher risk of an unfavorable clinical course. Hence, monitor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5 |
_version_ | 1783522901913239552 |
---|---|
author | Kroll, Lisa Böhning, Nikolaus Müßigbrodt, Heidi Stahl, Maria Halkin, Pavel Liehr, Birgit Grunow, Christine Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana Freise, Christian Hopfenmüller, Werner Friesdorf, Wolfgang Jockers-Scherübl, Maria Somasundaram, Rajan |
author_facet | Kroll, Lisa Böhning, Nikolaus Müßigbrodt, Heidi Stahl, Maria Halkin, Pavel Liehr, Birgit Grunow, Christine Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana Freise, Christian Hopfenmüller, Werner Friesdorf, Wolfgang Jockers-Scherübl, Maria Somasundaram, Rajan |
author_sort | Kroll, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Agitation is common in geriatric patients with cognitive impairment, e.g. in persons with dementia (PWD), who are admitted to an emergency department (ED). It might be a first sign of upcoming delirium and is associated with a higher risk of an unfavorable clinical course. Hence, monitoring of vital signs and enhanced movement as indicators of upcoming agitation is essential in these patients during their stay in the ED. Since PWD rarely tolerate fixed monitoring devices, a novel developed non-contact monitoring system (NCMSys) might represent an appropriate alternative. Aim of this feasibility study was to test the validity of a NCMSys and of the tent-like “Charité Dome” (ChD), aimed to shelter PWD from the busy ED environment. Furthermore, effects of the ChD on wellbeing and agitation of PWD were investigated. METHODS: Both devices were attached to patient’s bed. Tests on technical validity and safety issues of NCMSys and ChD were performed at the iDoc institute with six healthy volunteers. A feasibility study evaluating the reliability of the NCMSys with and without the ChD was performed in the real-life setting of an ED and on a geriatric-gerontopsychiatric ward. 19 patients were included, ten males and nine females; mean age: 77.4 (55–93) years of which 14 were PWD. PWD inclusion criteria were age ≥ 55 years, a dementia diagnosis and a written consent (by patients or by a custodian). Exclusion criteria were acute life-threatening situations and a missing consent. RESULTS: Measurements of heart rate, changes in movement and sound emissions by the NCMSys were valid, whereas patient movements affected respiratory rate measurements. The ChD did not impact patients’ vital signs or movements in our study setting. However, 53% of the PWD (7/13) and most of the patients without dementia (4/5) benefited from its use regarding their agitation and overall wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this feasibility study encourage a future controlled clinical trial in geriatric ED patients, including PWD, to further evaluate if our concept of non-contact measurement of vital signs and movement combined with the “Charité Dome” helps to prevent upcoming agitation in this vulnerable patient group in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ICTRP: “Charité-Dome-Study - DRKS00014737” (retrospectively registered). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7161155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71611552020-04-22 Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study Kroll, Lisa Böhning, Nikolaus Müßigbrodt, Heidi Stahl, Maria Halkin, Pavel Liehr, Birgit Grunow, Christine Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana Freise, Christian Hopfenmüller, Werner Friesdorf, Wolfgang Jockers-Scherübl, Maria Somasundaram, Rajan BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Agitation is common in geriatric patients with cognitive impairment, e.g. in persons with dementia (PWD), who are admitted to an emergency department (ED). It might be a first sign of upcoming delirium and is associated with a higher risk of an unfavorable clinical course. Hence, monitoring of vital signs and enhanced movement as indicators of upcoming agitation is essential in these patients during their stay in the ED. Since PWD rarely tolerate fixed monitoring devices, a novel developed non-contact monitoring system (NCMSys) might represent an appropriate alternative. Aim of this feasibility study was to test the validity of a NCMSys and of the tent-like “Charité Dome” (ChD), aimed to shelter PWD from the busy ED environment. Furthermore, effects of the ChD on wellbeing and agitation of PWD were investigated. METHODS: Both devices were attached to patient’s bed. Tests on technical validity and safety issues of NCMSys and ChD were performed at the iDoc institute with six healthy volunteers. A feasibility study evaluating the reliability of the NCMSys with and without the ChD was performed in the real-life setting of an ED and on a geriatric-gerontopsychiatric ward. 19 patients were included, ten males and nine females; mean age: 77.4 (55–93) years of which 14 were PWD. PWD inclusion criteria were age ≥ 55 years, a dementia diagnosis and a written consent (by patients or by a custodian). Exclusion criteria were acute life-threatening situations and a missing consent. RESULTS: Measurements of heart rate, changes in movement and sound emissions by the NCMSys were valid, whereas patient movements affected respiratory rate measurements. The ChD did not impact patients’ vital signs or movements in our study setting. However, 53% of the PWD (7/13) and most of the patients without dementia (4/5) benefited from its use regarding their agitation and overall wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this feasibility study encourage a future controlled clinical trial in geriatric ED patients, including PWD, to further evaluate if our concept of non-contact measurement of vital signs and movement combined with the “Charité Dome” helps to prevent upcoming agitation in this vulnerable patient group in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ICTRP: “Charité-Dome-Study - DRKS00014737” (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7161155/ /pubmed/32295567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kroll, Lisa Böhning, Nikolaus Müßigbrodt, Heidi Stahl, Maria Halkin, Pavel Liehr, Birgit Grunow, Christine Kujumdshieva-Böhning, Borjana Freise, Christian Hopfenmüller, Werner Friesdorf, Wolfgang Jockers-Scherübl, Maria Somasundaram, Rajan Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study |
title | Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study |
title_full | Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study |
title_short | Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study |
title_sort | non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krolllisa noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT bohningnikolaus noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT mußigbrodtheidi noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT stahlmaria noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT halkinpavel noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT liehrbirgit noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT grunowchristine noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT kujumdshievabohningborjana noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT freisechristian noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT hopfenmullerwerner noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT friesdorfwolfgang noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT jockersscherublmaria noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy AT somasundaramrajan noncontactmonitoringofagitationanduseofashelteringdeviceinpatientswithdementiainemergencydepartmentsafeasibilitystudy |