Cargando…

Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria

BACKGROUND: The use of combined antibiotic therapy has become an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The time-kill (TK) assay is considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of in vitro synergy, but it is a time-consuming and expensive method. The purpose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaudereto, Juliana Januario, Neto, Lauro Vieira Perdigão, Leite, Gleice Cristina, Espinoza, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez, Martins, Roberta Cristina Ruedas, Villas Boa Prado, Gladys, Rossi, Flavia, Guimarães, Thais, Levin, Anna Sara, Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01756-0
_version_ 1783522909390635008
author Gaudereto, Juliana Januario
Neto, Lauro Vieira Perdigão
Leite, Gleice Cristina
Espinoza, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez
Martins, Roberta Cristina Ruedas
Villas Boa Prado, Gladys
Rossi, Flavia
Guimarães, Thais
Levin, Anna Sara
Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
author_facet Gaudereto, Juliana Januario
Neto, Lauro Vieira Perdigão
Leite, Gleice Cristina
Espinoza, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez
Martins, Roberta Cristina Ruedas
Villas Boa Prado, Gladys
Rossi, Flavia
Guimarães, Thais
Levin, Anna Sara
Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
author_sort Gaudereto, Juliana Januario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of combined antibiotic therapy has become an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The time-kill (TK) assay is considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of in vitro synergy, but it is a time-consuming and expensive method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two methods for testing in vitro antimicrobial combinations: the disk diffusion method through disk approximation (DA) and the agar gradient diffusion method via the MIC:MIC ratio. The TK assay was included as the gold standard. MDR Gram-negative clinical isolates (n = 62; 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 20 Acinetobacter baumannii, and 14 Serratia marcescens) were submitted to TK, DA, and MIC:MIC ratio synergy methods. RESULTS: Overall, the agreement between the DA and TK assays ranged from 20 to 93%. The isolates of A. baumannii showed variable results of synergism according to TK, and the calculated agreement was statistically significant in this species against fosfomycin with meropenem including colistin-resistant isolates. The MIC:MIC ratiometric agreed from 35 to 71% with TK assays. The kappa test showed good agreement for the combination of colistin with amikacin (K = 0.58; P = 0.04) among the colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The DA and MIC:MIC ratiometric methods are easier to perform and might be a more viable tool for clinical microbiology laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7161189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71611892020-04-22 Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria Gaudereto, Juliana Januario Neto, Lauro Vieira Perdigão Leite, Gleice Cristina Espinoza, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez Martins, Roberta Cristina Ruedas Villas Boa Prado, Gladys Rossi, Flavia Guimarães, Thais Levin, Anna Sara Costa, Silvia Figueiredo BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of combined antibiotic therapy has become an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The time-kill (TK) assay is considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of in vitro synergy, but it is a time-consuming and expensive method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two methods for testing in vitro antimicrobial combinations: the disk diffusion method through disk approximation (DA) and the agar gradient diffusion method via the MIC:MIC ratio. The TK assay was included as the gold standard. MDR Gram-negative clinical isolates (n = 62; 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 20 Acinetobacter baumannii, and 14 Serratia marcescens) were submitted to TK, DA, and MIC:MIC ratio synergy methods. RESULTS: Overall, the agreement between the DA and TK assays ranged from 20 to 93%. The isolates of A. baumannii showed variable results of synergism according to TK, and the calculated agreement was statistically significant in this species against fosfomycin with meropenem including colistin-resistant isolates. The MIC:MIC ratiometric agreed from 35 to 71% with TK assays. The kappa test showed good agreement for the combination of colistin with amikacin (K = 0.58; P = 0.04) among the colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The DA and MIC:MIC ratiometric methods are easier to perform and might be a more viable tool for clinical microbiology laboratories. BioMed Central 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7161189/ /pubmed/32299353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01756-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gaudereto, Juliana Januario
Neto, Lauro Vieira Perdigão
Leite, Gleice Cristina
Espinoza, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez
Martins, Roberta Cristina Ruedas
Villas Boa Prado, Gladys
Rossi, Flavia
Guimarães, Thais
Levin, Anna Sara
Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
title Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
title_full Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
title_short Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
title_sort comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01756-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gauderetojulianajanuario comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT netolaurovieiraperdigao comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT leitegleicecristina comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT espinozaevelynpatriciasanchez comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT martinsrobertacristinaruedas comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT villasboapradogladys comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT rossiflavia comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT guimaraesthais comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT levinannasara comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria
AT costasilviafigueiredo comparisonofmethodsforthedetectionofinvitrosynergyinmultidrugresistantgramnegativebacteria