Cargando…

Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme

BACKGROUND: Trials have shown total diet replacement (TDR) programmes are safe and effective for weight loss in primary care. However, it is not clear whether participant characteristics affect uptake, attendance, or effectiveness of the programme. METHODS: We used data from 272 trial participants w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astbury, Nerys M., Tudor, Kate, Aveyard, Paul, Jebb, Susan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01547-4
_version_ 1783522913157120000
author Astbury, Nerys M.
Tudor, Kate
Aveyard, Paul
Jebb, Susan A.
author_facet Astbury, Nerys M.
Tudor, Kate
Aveyard, Paul
Jebb, Susan A.
author_sort Astbury, Nerys M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Trials have shown total diet replacement (TDR) programmes are safe and effective for weight loss in primary care. However, it is not clear whether participant characteristics affect uptake, attendance, or effectiveness of the programme. METHODS: We used data from 272 trial participants who were invited to participate in a clinical weight loss trial via a letter from their GP. We used a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis to assess whether accepting an invitation to participate in the trial differed by gender, age, BMI, social deprivation, and the presence of a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes or hypertension. We used mixed generalised linear modelling to examine whether participants’ age, gender, or social deprivation based on area of residence were associated with weight change at 12 months. RESULTS: Men were less likely to enrol than women (RR 0.59 [95% CI 0.47, 0.74]), and people from the middle and highest BMI tertile were more likely to enrol than those from the lowest tertile (RR 2.88 [95% CI 1.97, 4.22] and RR 4.38 [95% CI 3.05, 6.07], respectively). Patients from practices located in most deprived and intermediate deprived tertiles were more likely to enrol compared with those in the least deprived tertile (RR 1.84 [95% CI 1.81, 2.59] and RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.18, 2.85], respectively). There was no evidence that age or a pre-existing diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (RR 1.10 [95% CI 0.81, 1.50]) or hypertension (RR 0.81 [95% CI 0.62, 1.04]) affected enrolment. In the TDR group, 13% of participants were low engagers, 8% engaged with the weight loss phase only, and 79% engaged in both weight loss and weight maintenance phases of the programme. Those who engaged in the entire programme lost most weight. Subgroup analyses suggested that older participants and those with a higher baseline BMI lost more weight at 1 year than their comparators. CONCLUSION: Despite some heterogeneity in the uptake and outcomes of the programme, if the results of this trial are replicated in routine practice, there is no evidence that TDR weight loss programmes would increase inequity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DROPLET trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN75092026).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7161206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71612062020-04-22 Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme Astbury, Nerys M. Tudor, Kate Aveyard, Paul Jebb, Susan A. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Trials have shown total diet replacement (TDR) programmes are safe and effective for weight loss in primary care. However, it is not clear whether participant characteristics affect uptake, attendance, or effectiveness of the programme. METHODS: We used data from 272 trial participants who were invited to participate in a clinical weight loss trial via a letter from their GP. We used a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis to assess whether accepting an invitation to participate in the trial differed by gender, age, BMI, social deprivation, and the presence of a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes or hypertension. We used mixed generalised linear modelling to examine whether participants’ age, gender, or social deprivation based on area of residence were associated with weight change at 12 months. RESULTS: Men were less likely to enrol than women (RR 0.59 [95% CI 0.47, 0.74]), and people from the middle and highest BMI tertile were more likely to enrol than those from the lowest tertile (RR 2.88 [95% CI 1.97, 4.22] and RR 4.38 [95% CI 3.05, 6.07], respectively). Patients from practices located in most deprived and intermediate deprived tertiles were more likely to enrol compared with those in the least deprived tertile (RR 1.84 [95% CI 1.81, 2.59] and RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.18, 2.85], respectively). There was no evidence that age or a pre-existing diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (RR 1.10 [95% CI 0.81, 1.50]) or hypertension (RR 0.81 [95% CI 0.62, 1.04]) affected enrolment. In the TDR group, 13% of participants were low engagers, 8% engaged with the weight loss phase only, and 79% engaged in both weight loss and weight maintenance phases of the programme. Those who engaged in the entire programme lost most weight. Subgroup analyses suggested that older participants and those with a higher baseline BMI lost more weight at 1 year than their comparators. CONCLUSION: Despite some heterogeneity in the uptake and outcomes of the programme, if the results of this trial are replicated in routine practice, there is no evidence that TDR weight loss programmes would increase inequity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DROPLET trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN75092026). BioMed Central 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7161206/ /pubmed/32295605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01547-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Astbury, Nerys M.
Tudor, Kate
Aveyard, Paul
Jebb, Susan A.
Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme
title Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme
title_full Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme
title_short Heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme
title_sort heterogeneity in the uptake, attendance, and outcomes in a clinical trial of a total diet replacement weight loss programme
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01547-4
work_keys_str_mv AT astburynerysm heterogeneityintheuptakeattendanceandoutcomesinaclinicaltrialofatotaldietreplacementweightlossprogramme
AT tudorkate heterogeneityintheuptakeattendanceandoutcomesinaclinicaltrialofatotaldietreplacementweightlossprogramme
AT aveyardpaul heterogeneityintheuptakeattendanceandoutcomesinaclinicaltrialofatotaldietreplacementweightlossprogramme
AT jebbsusana heterogeneityintheuptakeattendanceandoutcomesinaclinicaltrialofatotaldietreplacementweightlossprogramme