Cargando…

Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways

BACKGROUND: Infusion testing is a common procedure to determine whether shunting will be beneficial in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. The method has a well-developed theoretical foundation and corresponding mathematical models that describe the CSF circulation from the choroid plexus t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinje, Vegard, Eklund, Anders, Mardal, Kent-Andre, Rognes, Marie E., Støverud, Karen-Helene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-020-00189-1
_version_ 1783522931957039104
author Vinje, Vegard
Eklund, Anders
Mardal, Kent-Andre
Rognes, Marie E.
Støverud, Karen-Helene
author_facet Vinje, Vegard
Eklund, Anders
Mardal, Kent-Andre
Rognes, Marie E.
Støverud, Karen-Helene
author_sort Vinje, Vegard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infusion testing is a common procedure to determine whether shunting will be beneficial in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. The method has a well-developed theoretical foundation and corresponding mathematical models that describe the CSF circulation from the choroid plexus to the arachnoid granulations. Here, we investigate to what extent the proposed glymphatic or paravascular pathway (or similar pathways) modifies the results of the traditional mathematical models. METHODS: We used a compartment model to estimate pressure in the subarachnoid space and the paravascular spaces. For the arachnoid granulations, the cribriform plate and the glymphatic circulation, resistances were calculated and used to estimate pressure and flow before and during an infusion test. Finally, different variations to the model were tested to evaluate the sensitivity of selected parameters. RESULTS: At baseline intracranial pressure (ICP), we found a very small paravascular flow directed into the subarachnoid space, while 60% of the fluid left through the arachnoid granulations and 40% left through the cribriform plate. However, during the infusion, 80% of the fluid left through the arachnoid granulations, 20% through the cribriform plate and flow in the PVS was stagnant. Resistance through the glymphatic system was computed to be 2.73 mmHg/(mL/min), considerably lower than other fluid pathways, giving non-realistic ICP during infusion if combined with a lymphatic drainage route. CONCLUSIONS: The relative distribution of CSF flow to different clearance pathways depends on ICP, with the arachnoid granulations as the main contributor to outflow. As such, ICP increase is an important factor that should be addressed when determining the pathways of injected substances in the subarachnoid space. Our results suggest that the glymphatic resistance is too high to allow for pressure driven flow by arterial pulsations and at the same time too small to allow for a direct drainage route from PVS to cervical lymphatics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7161287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71612872020-04-22 Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways Vinje, Vegard Eklund, Anders Mardal, Kent-Andre Rognes, Marie E. Støverud, Karen-Helene Fluids Barriers CNS Research BACKGROUND: Infusion testing is a common procedure to determine whether shunting will be beneficial in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. The method has a well-developed theoretical foundation and corresponding mathematical models that describe the CSF circulation from the choroid plexus to the arachnoid granulations. Here, we investigate to what extent the proposed glymphatic or paravascular pathway (or similar pathways) modifies the results of the traditional mathematical models. METHODS: We used a compartment model to estimate pressure in the subarachnoid space and the paravascular spaces. For the arachnoid granulations, the cribriform plate and the glymphatic circulation, resistances were calculated and used to estimate pressure and flow before and during an infusion test. Finally, different variations to the model were tested to evaluate the sensitivity of selected parameters. RESULTS: At baseline intracranial pressure (ICP), we found a very small paravascular flow directed into the subarachnoid space, while 60% of the fluid left through the arachnoid granulations and 40% left through the cribriform plate. However, during the infusion, 80% of the fluid left through the arachnoid granulations, 20% through the cribriform plate and flow in the PVS was stagnant. Resistance through the glymphatic system was computed to be 2.73 mmHg/(mL/min), considerably lower than other fluid pathways, giving non-realistic ICP during infusion if combined with a lymphatic drainage route. CONCLUSIONS: The relative distribution of CSF flow to different clearance pathways depends on ICP, with the arachnoid granulations as the main contributor to outflow. As such, ICP increase is an important factor that should be addressed when determining the pathways of injected substances in the subarachnoid space. Our results suggest that the glymphatic resistance is too high to allow for pressure driven flow by arterial pulsations and at the same time too small to allow for a direct drainage route from PVS to cervical lymphatics. BioMed Central 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7161287/ /pubmed/32299464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-020-00189-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Vinje, Vegard
Eklund, Anders
Mardal, Kent-Andre
Rognes, Marie E.
Støverud, Karen-Helene
Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways
title Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways
title_full Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways
title_fullStr Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways
title_short Intracranial pressure elevation alters CSF clearance pathways
title_sort intracranial pressure elevation alters csf clearance pathways
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-020-00189-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vinjevegard intracranialpressureelevationalterscsfclearancepathways
AT eklundanders intracranialpressureelevationalterscsfclearancepathways
AT mardalkentandre intracranialpressureelevationalterscsfclearancepathways
AT rognesmariee intracranialpressureelevationalterscsfclearancepathways
AT støverudkarenhelene intracranialpressureelevationalterscsfclearancepathways