Cargando…

Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization

BACKGROUND: In the literature, attempts are seldom made to quantify spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization. This study aimed to investigate the spatial limitations associated with cortical contact with the mandibular second molar during mandibular arch distalization. METHODS: The st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chia-Ling, Chen, Chia-Hui, Pan, Chin-Yun, Chang, Hong-Po, Chen, Ping-Ho, Tseng, Yu-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00441-y
_version_ 1783522934127591424
author Chen, Chia-Ling
Chen, Chia-Hui
Pan, Chin-Yun
Chang, Hong-Po
Chen, Ping-Ho
Tseng, Yu-Chuan
author_facet Chen, Chia-Ling
Chen, Chia-Hui
Pan, Chin-Yun
Chang, Hong-Po
Chen, Ping-Ho
Tseng, Yu-Chuan
author_sort Chen, Chia-Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the literature, attempts are seldom made to quantify spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization. This study aimed to investigate the spatial limitations associated with cortical contact with the mandibular second molar during mandibular arch distalization. METHODS: The study population included 67 individuals who had undergone cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (34 male and 33 female; mean age: 23.9 ± 2.72 years). The total ridge width, alveolar housing width, and root width were measured to evaluate the buccolingual limit. The space distal to the molar root represented the mesiodistal limit. The influence of sex, right versus left side, root-contact condition, malocclusion category, and presence of wisdom teeth were evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of cortical contact was 49.3% before any orthodontic movement. No significant differences were observed in the alveolar width according to sex (male vs female), side assessed (right vs left), wisdom teeth (present vs absent), or malocclusion category. The ridge width and the alveolar width were smaller in the contact group than in the non-contact group (P < 0.01). The group with wisdom teeth showed a larger available distalization distance, but a significant difference was observed only near the alveolar crest. CONCLUSIONS: Both ridge width and available distalization distance were limiting factors for mandibular teeth distalization. For cases in which whole-arch distalization is planned, CBCT is recommended before treatment, especially for non-extraction treatment. This approach ensures safe and predictable tooth movement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7161296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71612962020-04-22 Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization Chen, Chia-Ling Chen, Chia-Hui Pan, Chin-Yun Chang, Hong-Po Chen, Ping-Ho Tseng, Yu-Chuan BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: In the literature, attempts are seldom made to quantify spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization. This study aimed to investigate the spatial limitations associated with cortical contact with the mandibular second molar during mandibular arch distalization. METHODS: The study population included 67 individuals who had undergone cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (34 male and 33 female; mean age: 23.9 ± 2.72 years). The total ridge width, alveolar housing width, and root width were measured to evaluate the buccolingual limit. The space distal to the molar root represented the mesiodistal limit. The influence of sex, right versus left side, root-contact condition, malocclusion category, and presence of wisdom teeth were evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of cortical contact was 49.3% before any orthodontic movement. No significant differences were observed in the alveolar width according to sex (male vs female), side assessed (right vs left), wisdom teeth (present vs absent), or malocclusion category. The ridge width and the alveolar width were smaller in the contact group than in the non-contact group (P < 0.01). The group with wisdom teeth showed a larger available distalization distance, but a significant difference was observed only near the alveolar crest. CONCLUSIONS: Both ridge width and available distalization distance were limiting factors for mandibular teeth distalization. For cases in which whole-arch distalization is planned, CBCT is recommended before treatment, especially for non-extraction treatment. This approach ensures safe and predictable tooth movement. BioMed Central 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7161296/ /pubmed/32293310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00441-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Chia-Ling
Chen, Chia-Hui
Pan, Chin-Yun
Chang, Hong-Po
Chen, Ping-Ho
Tseng, Yu-Chuan
Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization
title Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization
title_full Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization
title_fullStr Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization
title_full_unstemmed Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization
title_short Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization
title_sort cone beam computed tomographic analysis of the spatial limitation during mandibular arch distalization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00441-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchialing conebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofthespatiallimitationduringmandibulararchdistalization
AT chenchiahui conebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofthespatiallimitationduringmandibulararchdistalization
AT panchinyun conebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofthespatiallimitationduringmandibulararchdistalization
AT changhongpo conebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofthespatiallimitationduringmandibulararchdistalization
AT chenpingho conebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofthespatiallimitationduringmandibulararchdistalization
AT tsengyuchuan conebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofthespatiallimitationduringmandibulararchdistalization