Cargando…
Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. DESIGN: A three-round web-based i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221 |
_version_ | 1783522998254305280 |
---|---|
author | Kerckhoffs, Monika C. Senekal, Jannien van Dijk, Diederik Artigas, Antonio Butler, Jenie Michalsen, Andrej van Mol, Margo M. C. Moreno, Rui Pais da Silva, Filipa Picetti, Edoardo Póvoa, Pedro Robertsen, Annette van Delden, Johannes J. M. |
author_facet | Kerckhoffs, Monika C. Senekal, Jannien van Dijk, Diederik Artigas, Antonio Butler, Jenie Michalsen, Andrej van Mol, Margo M. C. Moreno, Rui Pais da Silva, Filipa Picetti, Edoardo Póvoa, Pedro Robertsen, Annette van Delden, Johannes J. M. |
author_sort | Kerckhoffs, Monika C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. DESIGN: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. SETTING: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7161724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71617242020-05-04 Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study Kerckhoffs, Monika C. Senekal, Jannien van Dijk, Diederik Artigas, Antonio Butler, Jenie Michalsen, Andrej van Mol, Margo M. C. Moreno, Rui Pais da Silva, Filipa Picetti, Edoardo Póvoa, Pedro Robertsen, Annette van Delden, Johannes J. M. Crit Care Med Clinical Investigations To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. DESIGN: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. SETTING: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-05 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7161724/ /pubmed/32310619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Kerckhoffs, Monika C. Senekal, Jannien van Dijk, Diederik Artigas, Antonio Butler, Jenie Michalsen, Andrej van Mol, Margo M. C. Moreno, Rui Pais da Silva, Filipa Picetti, Edoardo Póvoa, Pedro Robertsen, Annette van Delden, Johannes J. M. Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study |
title | Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study |
title_full | Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study |
title_fullStr | Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study |
title_short | Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study |
title_sort | framework to support the process of decision-making on life-sustaining treatments in the icu: results of a delphi study |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kerckhoffsmonikac frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT senekaljannien frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT vandijkdiederik frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT artigasantonio frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT butlerjenie frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT michalsenandrej frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT vanmolmargomc frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT morenorui frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT paisdasilvafilipa frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT picettiedoardo frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT povoapedro frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT robertsenannette frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy AT vandeldenjohannesjm frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy |