Cargando…

Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study

To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. DESIGN: A three-round web-based i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerckhoffs, Monika C., Senekal, Jannien, van Dijk, Diederik, Artigas, Antonio, Butler, Jenie, Michalsen, Andrej, van Mol, Margo M. C., Moreno, Rui, Pais da Silva, Filipa, Picetti, Edoardo, Póvoa, Pedro, Robertsen, Annette, van Delden, Johannes J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221
_version_ 1783522998254305280
author Kerckhoffs, Monika C.
Senekal, Jannien
van Dijk, Diederik
Artigas, Antonio
Butler, Jenie
Michalsen, Andrej
van Mol, Margo M. C.
Moreno, Rui
Pais da Silva, Filipa
Picetti, Edoardo
Póvoa, Pedro
Robertsen, Annette
van Delden, Johannes J. M.
author_facet Kerckhoffs, Monika C.
Senekal, Jannien
van Dijk, Diederik
Artigas, Antonio
Butler, Jenie
Michalsen, Andrej
van Mol, Margo M. C.
Moreno, Rui
Pais da Silva, Filipa
Picetti, Edoardo
Póvoa, Pedro
Robertsen, Annette
van Delden, Johannes J. M.
author_sort Kerckhoffs, Monika C.
collection PubMed
description To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. DESIGN: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. SETTING: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7161724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71617242020-05-04 Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study Kerckhoffs, Monika C. Senekal, Jannien van Dijk, Diederik Artigas, Antonio Butler, Jenie Michalsen, Andrej van Mol, Margo M. C. Moreno, Rui Pais da Silva, Filipa Picetti, Edoardo Póvoa, Pedro Robertsen, Annette van Delden, Johannes J. M. Crit Care Med Clinical Investigations To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries. DESIGN: A three-round web-based international Delphi consensus study with a priori consensus definition was conducted with experts from 13 countries. Participants reviewed items of the decision-making process on a seven-point Likert scale or with open-ended questions. Questions concerned terminology, content, and timing of decision-making steps. The summarized results (including mean scores) and expert suggestions were presented in the subsequent round for review. SETTING: Web-based surveys of international participants representing ICU physicians, nurses, former ICU patients, and surrogate decision makers. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In three rounds, respectively, 28, 28, and 27 (of 33 invited) physicians together with 12, 10, and seven (of 19 invited) nurses participated. Patients and surrogates were involved in round one and 12 of 27 responded. Caregivers were mostly working in university affiliated hospitals in Northern Europe. During the Delphi process, most items were modified in order to reach consensus. Seven items lacked consensus after three rounds. The final consensus framework comprises the content and timing of four elements; three elements focused on caregiver-surrogate communication (admission meeting, follow-up meeting, goals-of-care meeting); and one element (weekly time-out meeting) focused on assessing preferences, prognosis, and proportionality of ICU treatment among professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians, nurses, patients, and surrogates generated a consensus-based framework to guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. Early, frequent, and scheduled family meetings combined with a repeated multidisciplinary time-out meeting may support decisions in relation to patient preferences, prognosis, and proportionality. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-05 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7161724/ /pubmed/32310619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Kerckhoffs, Monika C.
Senekal, Jannien
van Dijk, Diederik
Artigas, Antonio
Butler, Jenie
Michalsen, Andrej
van Mol, Margo M. C.
Moreno, Rui
Pais da Silva, Filipa
Picetti, Edoardo
Póvoa, Pedro
Robertsen, Annette
van Delden, Johannes J. M.
Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
title Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
title_full Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
title_fullStr Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
title_short Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study
title_sort framework to support the process of decision-making on life-sustaining treatments in the icu: results of a delphi study
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221
work_keys_str_mv AT kerckhoffsmonikac frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT senekaljannien frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT vandijkdiederik frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT artigasantonio frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT butlerjenie frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT michalsenandrej frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT vanmolmargomc frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT morenorui frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT paisdasilvafilipa frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT picettiedoardo frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT povoapedro frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT robertsenannette frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy
AT vandeldenjohannesjm frameworktosupporttheprocessofdecisionmakingonlifesustainingtreatmentsintheicuresultsofadelphistudy