Cargando…
The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
OBJECTIVE: Whether the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) affects the outcome of twin pregnancies is still a matter of debate. Previous studies have evaluated the association between birth weight and ART, without a clear distinction between fetal growth restriction (FGR), a condition at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231028 |
_version_ | 1783523034618920960 |
---|---|
author | Seravalli, Viola Maoloni, Lorenzo Pasquini, Lucia Bolzonella, Sara Sisti, Giovanni Petraglia, Felice Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria |
author_facet | Seravalli, Viola Maoloni, Lorenzo Pasquini, Lucia Bolzonella, Sara Sisti, Giovanni Petraglia, Felice Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria |
author_sort | Seravalli, Viola |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Whether the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) affects the outcome of twin pregnancies is still a matter of debate. Previous studies have evaluated the association between birth weight and ART, without a clear distinction between fetal growth restriction (FGR), a condition at higher risk of adverse outcome, and constitutionally small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses. The aim of this study was to determine whether dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies obtained by ART have a greater risk of developing FGR, defined by accurate ultrasound criteria, than those spontaneously conceived (SC), and to compare the severity of ultrasound features in the growth restricted fetuses. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on DC twin pregnancies delivered between 2010 to 2018 at a tertiary hospital. Twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously were compared with those obtained via in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), after exclusion of cases with major fetal or uterine malformations. The primary outcome was the incidence of FGR. Secondary outcome was the rate of SGA neonates, defined by a birth weight less than the 10(th) percentile. The ultrasound characteristics of the growth restricted fetuses in the two groups were also compared. The groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-eight DC twin pregnancies were identified. Of these, 367 (54.1%) conceived via IVF/ICSI and 311 (45.9%) conceived spontaneously. The incidence of FGR was not significantly different between the ART and the SC groups (7.9% vs 8.4% respectively, p = 0.76, adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.53–1.32). Growth restricted fetuses of the two groups showed similar occurrence of an estimated fetal weight less than the 3(rd) percentile, similar abnormalities in Doppler studies and similar gestational age at diagnosis. There was no difference in the incidence of delivery of an SGA neonate (p = 0.47) or in the rate of maternal complications and preterm delivery between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies do not have a higher risk of ultrasound-diagnosed FGR than spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies, and fetuses diagnosed with growth restriction in the two groups show similar severity of the ultrasound findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7162456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71624562020-04-21 The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies Seravalli, Viola Maoloni, Lorenzo Pasquini, Lucia Bolzonella, Sara Sisti, Giovanni Petraglia, Felice Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Whether the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) affects the outcome of twin pregnancies is still a matter of debate. Previous studies have evaluated the association between birth weight and ART, without a clear distinction between fetal growth restriction (FGR), a condition at higher risk of adverse outcome, and constitutionally small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses. The aim of this study was to determine whether dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies obtained by ART have a greater risk of developing FGR, defined by accurate ultrasound criteria, than those spontaneously conceived (SC), and to compare the severity of ultrasound features in the growth restricted fetuses. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on DC twin pregnancies delivered between 2010 to 2018 at a tertiary hospital. Twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously were compared with those obtained via in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), after exclusion of cases with major fetal or uterine malformations. The primary outcome was the incidence of FGR. Secondary outcome was the rate of SGA neonates, defined by a birth weight less than the 10(th) percentile. The ultrasound characteristics of the growth restricted fetuses in the two groups were also compared. The groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-eight DC twin pregnancies were identified. Of these, 367 (54.1%) conceived via IVF/ICSI and 311 (45.9%) conceived spontaneously. The incidence of FGR was not significantly different between the ART and the SC groups (7.9% vs 8.4% respectively, p = 0.76, adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.53–1.32). Growth restricted fetuses of the two groups showed similar occurrence of an estimated fetal weight less than the 3(rd) percentile, similar abnormalities in Doppler studies and similar gestational age at diagnosis. There was no difference in the incidence of delivery of an SGA neonate (p = 0.47) or in the rate of maternal complications and preterm delivery between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies do not have a higher risk of ultrasound-diagnosed FGR than spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies, and fetuses diagnosed with growth restriction in the two groups show similar severity of the ultrasound findings. Public Library of Science 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162456/ /pubmed/32298277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231028 Text en © 2020 Seravalli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seravalli, Viola Maoloni, Lorenzo Pasquini, Lucia Bolzonella, Sara Sisti, Giovanni Petraglia, Felice Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies |
title | The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies |
title_full | The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies |
title_fullStr | The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies |
title_short | The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies |
title_sort | impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seravalliviola theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT maolonilorenzo theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT pasquinilucia theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT bolzonellasara theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT sistigiovanni theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT petragliafelice theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT ditommasomariarosaria theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT seravalliviola impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT maolonilorenzo impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT pasquinilucia impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT bolzonellasara impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT sistigiovanni impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT petragliafelice impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies AT ditommasomariarosaria impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies |