Cargando…

The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVE: Whether the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) affects the outcome of twin pregnancies is still a matter of debate. Previous studies have evaluated the association between birth weight and ART, without a clear distinction between fetal growth restriction (FGR), a condition at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seravalli, Viola, Maoloni, Lorenzo, Pasquini, Lucia, Bolzonella, Sara, Sisti, Giovanni, Petraglia, Felice, Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231028
_version_ 1783523034618920960
author Seravalli, Viola
Maoloni, Lorenzo
Pasquini, Lucia
Bolzonella, Sara
Sisti, Giovanni
Petraglia, Felice
Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria
author_facet Seravalli, Viola
Maoloni, Lorenzo
Pasquini, Lucia
Bolzonella, Sara
Sisti, Giovanni
Petraglia, Felice
Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria
author_sort Seravalli, Viola
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Whether the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) affects the outcome of twin pregnancies is still a matter of debate. Previous studies have evaluated the association between birth weight and ART, without a clear distinction between fetal growth restriction (FGR), a condition at higher risk of adverse outcome, and constitutionally small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses. The aim of this study was to determine whether dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies obtained by ART have a greater risk of developing FGR, defined by accurate ultrasound criteria, than those spontaneously conceived (SC), and to compare the severity of ultrasound features in the growth restricted fetuses. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on DC twin pregnancies delivered between 2010 to 2018 at a tertiary hospital. Twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously were compared with those obtained via in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), after exclusion of cases with major fetal or uterine malformations. The primary outcome was the incidence of FGR. Secondary outcome was the rate of SGA neonates, defined by a birth weight less than the 10(th) percentile. The ultrasound characteristics of the growth restricted fetuses in the two groups were also compared. The groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-eight DC twin pregnancies were identified. Of these, 367 (54.1%) conceived via IVF/ICSI and 311 (45.9%) conceived spontaneously. The incidence of FGR was not significantly different between the ART and the SC groups (7.9% vs 8.4% respectively, p = 0.76, adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.53–1.32). Growth restricted fetuses of the two groups showed similar occurrence of an estimated fetal weight less than the 3(rd) percentile, similar abnormalities in Doppler studies and similar gestational age at diagnosis. There was no difference in the incidence of delivery of an SGA neonate (p = 0.47) or in the rate of maternal complications and preterm delivery between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies do not have a higher risk of ultrasound-diagnosed FGR than spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies, and fetuses diagnosed with growth restriction in the two groups show similar severity of the ultrasound findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7162456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71624562020-04-21 The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies Seravalli, Viola Maoloni, Lorenzo Pasquini, Lucia Bolzonella, Sara Sisti, Giovanni Petraglia, Felice Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Whether the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) affects the outcome of twin pregnancies is still a matter of debate. Previous studies have evaluated the association between birth weight and ART, without a clear distinction between fetal growth restriction (FGR), a condition at higher risk of adverse outcome, and constitutionally small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses. The aim of this study was to determine whether dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies obtained by ART have a greater risk of developing FGR, defined by accurate ultrasound criteria, than those spontaneously conceived (SC), and to compare the severity of ultrasound features in the growth restricted fetuses. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on DC twin pregnancies delivered between 2010 to 2018 at a tertiary hospital. Twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously were compared with those obtained via in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), after exclusion of cases with major fetal or uterine malformations. The primary outcome was the incidence of FGR. Secondary outcome was the rate of SGA neonates, defined by a birth weight less than the 10(th) percentile. The ultrasound characteristics of the growth restricted fetuses in the two groups were also compared. The groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Six hundred and seventy-eight DC twin pregnancies were identified. Of these, 367 (54.1%) conceived via IVF/ICSI and 311 (45.9%) conceived spontaneously. The incidence of FGR was not significantly different between the ART and the SC groups (7.9% vs 8.4% respectively, p = 0.76, adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.53–1.32). Growth restricted fetuses of the two groups showed similar occurrence of an estimated fetal weight less than the 3(rd) percentile, similar abnormalities in Doppler studies and similar gestational age at diagnosis. There was no difference in the incidence of delivery of an SGA neonate (p = 0.47) or in the rate of maternal complications and preterm delivery between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies do not have a higher risk of ultrasound-diagnosed FGR than spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies, and fetuses diagnosed with growth restriction in the two groups show similar severity of the ultrasound findings. Public Library of Science 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162456/ /pubmed/32298277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231028 Text en © 2020 Seravalli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seravalli, Viola
Maoloni, Lorenzo
Pasquini, Lucia
Bolzonella, Sara
Sisti, Giovanni
Petraglia, Felice
Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria
The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
title The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
title_full The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
title_fullStr The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
title_full_unstemmed The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
title_short The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
title_sort impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231028
work_keys_str_mv AT seravalliviola theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT maolonilorenzo theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT pasquinilucia theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT bolzonellasara theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT sistigiovanni theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT petragliafelice theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT ditommasomariarosaria theimpactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT seravalliviola impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT maolonilorenzo impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT pasquinilucia impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT bolzonellasara impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT sistigiovanni impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT petragliafelice impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies
AT ditommasomariarosaria impactofassistedreproductivetechnologyonprenatallydiagnosedfetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnancies