Cargando…

The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in critically ill patients is linked with significant mortality and morbidity. However, it remains controversial whether nutrition therapy protocols are effective in improving clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical ICU nutritio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chinda, Pornrat, Poomthong, Pulyamon, Toadithep, Puriwat, Thanakiattiwibun, Chayanan, Chaiwat, Onuma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231777
_version_ 1783523038361288704
author Chinda, Pornrat
Poomthong, Pulyamon
Toadithep, Puriwat
Thanakiattiwibun, Chayanan
Chaiwat, Onuma
author_facet Chinda, Pornrat
Poomthong, Pulyamon
Toadithep, Puriwat
Thanakiattiwibun, Chayanan
Chaiwat, Onuma
author_sort Chinda, Pornrat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in critically ill patients is linked with significant mortality and morbidity. However, it remains controversial whether nutrition therapy protocols are effective in improving clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical ICU nutrition protocol, and to compare the hospital mortality, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS of protocol and non-protocol groups. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Surgical ICU, Siriraj Hospital. The nutrition administration of the control group was at the discretion of the attending physicians, whereas that of the intervention group followed the “Siriraj Surgical ICU Nutrition Protocol”. Details of the demographic data, nutritional data, and clinical outcomes were collected. RESULTS: In all, 170 patients underwent randomization, with 85 individuals each in the protocol and non-protocol groups. More than 90% of the patients in both groups were at risk of malnutrition, indicated by a score of ≥ 3 on the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 tool. The average daily calories of the 2 groups were very similar (protocol group, 775.4±342.2 kcal vs. control group, 773.0±391.9 kcal; p = 0.972). However, the median time to commence enteral nutrition was shorter for the protocol group (1.94 days) than the control group (2.25 days; p = 0.503). Enteral nutrition was provided within the first 48 hours to 53.7% of the protocol patients vs. 47.4% of the control patients (p = 0.589). In addition, a higher proportion of the protocol patients (36.5%) reached the 60% calorie-target on Day 4 after admission than that for the non-protocol group (25.9%; p = 0.136). All other clinical outcomes and nutrition-related complications were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the nutrition protocol did not improve the feeding effectiveness or clinical outcomes as compared to usual nutrition management practices of the Surgical ICU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7162472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71624722020-04-21 The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital Chinda, Pornrat Poomthong, Pulyamon Toadithep, Puriwat Thanakiattiwibun, Chayanan Chaiwat, Onuma PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in critically ill patients is linked with significant mortality and morbidity. However, it remains controversial whether nutrition therapy protocols are effective in improving clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical ICU nutrition protocol, and to compare the hospital mortality, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS of protocol and non-protocol groups. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Surgical ICU, Siriraj Hospital. The nutrition administration of the control group was at the discretion of the attending physicians, whereas that of the intervention group followed the “Siriraj Surgical ICU Nutrition Protocol”. Details of the demographic data, nutritional data, and clinical outcomes were collected. RESULTS: In all, 170 patients underwent randomization, with 85 individuals each in the protocol and non-protocol groups. More than 90% of the patients in both groups were at risk of malnutrition, indicated by a score of ≥ 3 on the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 tool. The average daily calories of the 2 groups were very similar (protocol group, 775.4±342.2 kcal vs. control group, 773.0±391.9 kcal; p = 0.972). However, the median time to commence enteral nutrition was shorter for the protocol group (1.94 days) than the control group (2.25 days; p = 0.503). Enteral nutrition was provided within the first 48 hours to 53.7% of the protocol patients vs. 47.4% of the control patients (p = 0.589). In addition, a higher proportion of the protocol patients (36.5%) reached the 60% calorie-target on Day 4 after admission than that for the non-protocol group (25.9%; p = 0.136). All other clinical outcomes and nutrition-related complications were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the nutrition protocol did not improve the feeding effectiveness or clinical outcomes as compared to usual nutrition management practices of the Surgical ICU. Public Library of Science 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162472/ /pubmed/32298381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231777 Text en © 2020 Chinda et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chinda, Pornrat
Poomthong, Pulyamon
Toadithep, Puriwat
Thanakiattiwibun, Chayanan
Chaiwat, Onuma
The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
title The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
title_full The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
title_fullStr The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
title_full_unstemmed The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
title_short The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
title_sort implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231777
work_keys_str_mv AT chindapornrat theimplementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT poomthongpulyamon theimplementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT toaditheppuriwat theimplementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT thanakiattiwibunchayanan theimplementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT chaiwatonuma theimplementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT chindapornrat implementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT poomthongpulyamon implementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT toaditheppuriwat implementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT thanakiattiwibunchayanan implementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital
AT chaiwatonuma implementationofanutritionprotocolinasurgicalintensivecareunitarandomizedcontrolledtrialatatertiarycarehospital