Cargando…

Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil

Molecular-based taxonomy, specifically DNA barcoding, has streamlined organism identification. For land plants, the recommended 2-locus barcode of rbcL and matK is not suitable for all groups, thus the second subunit of the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) has received attention as a possi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timpano, Emma K., Scheible, Melissa K. R., Meiklejohn, Kelly A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231436
_version_ 1783523042073247744
author Timpano, Emma K.
Scheible, Melissa K. R.
Meiklejohn, Kelly A.
author_facet Timpano, Emma K.
Scheible, Melissa K. R.
Meiklejohn, Kelly A.
author_sort Timpano, Emma K.
collection PubMed
description Molecular-based taxonomy, specifically DNA barcoding, has streamlined organism identification. For land plants, the recommended 2-locus barcode of rbcL and matK is not suitable for all groups, thus the second subunit of the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) has received attention as a possible alternative. To date, evaluations of ITS2 have mostly been limited in scope to specific plant orders/families and single source material. Prior to using ITS2 to routinely characterize land plants present in environmental samples (i.e., DNA metabarcoding), a wet lab protocol optimized for bulk sample types is needed. To address this gap, in this study we determined the broad recoverability across land plants when using published ITS2 primer pairs, and subsequently optimized the PCR reaction constituents and cycling conditions for the best two performing primer pairs (ITS2F/ITSp4 and ITSp3/ITSu4). Using these conditions, both primer pairs were used to characterize land plants present in 17 diverse soils collected from across the US. The resulting PCR amplicons were prepared into libraries and pooled for sequencing on an Illumina(®) MiniSeq. Our existing bioinformatics workflow was used to process raw sequencing data and taxonomically assign unique ITS2 plant sequences by comparison to GenBank. Given strict quality criteria were imposed on sequences for inclusion in data analysis, only 43.6% and 7.5% of sequences from ITS2F/ITSp4 and ITSp3/ITSu4 respectively remained for taxonomic comparisons; ~7–11% of sequences originated from fungal co-amplification. The number of orders and families recovered did differ between primer pairs, with ITS2F/ITSp4 consistently outperforming ITSp3/ITSu4 by >15%. Primer pair bias was observed in the recovery of certain taxonomic groups; ITS2F/ITSp4 preferentially recovered flowering plants and grasses, whereas ITSp3/ITSu4 recovered more moss taxa. To maximize data recovery and reduce potential bias, we advocate that studies using ITS2 to characterize land plants from environmental samples such as soil use a multiple primer pair approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7162488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71624882020-04-21 Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil Timpano, Emma K. Scheible, Melissa K. R. Meiklejohn, Kelly A. PLoS One Research Article Molecular-based taxonomy, specifically DNA barcoding, has streamlined organism identification. For land plants, the recommended 2-locus barcode of rbcL and matK is not suitable for all groups, thus the second subunit of the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) has received attention as a possible alternative. To date, evaluations of ITS2 have mostly been limited in scope to specific plant orders/families and single source material. Prior to using ITS2 to routinely characterize land plants present in environmental samples (i.e., DNA metabarcoding), a wet lab protocol optimized for bulk sample types is needed. To address this gap, in this study we determined the broad recoverability across land plants when using published ITS2 primer pairs, and subsequently optimized the PCR reaction constituents and cycling conditions for the best two performing primer pairs (ITS2F/ITSp4 and ITSp3/ITSu4). Using these conditions, both primer pairs were used to characterize land plants present in 17 diverse soils collected from across the US. The resulting PCR amplicons were prepared into libraries and pooled for sequencing on an Illumina(®) MiniSeq. Our existing bioinformatics workflow was used to process raw sequencing data and taxonomically assign unique ITS2 plant sequences by comparison to GenBank. Given strict quality criteria were imposed on sequences for inclusion in data analysis, only 43.6% and 7.5% of sequences from ITS2F/ITSp4 and ITSp3/ITSu4 respectively remained for taxonomic comparisons; ~7–11% of sequences originated from fungal co-amplification. The number of orders and families recovered did differ between primer pairs, with ITS2F/ITSp4 consistently outperforming ITSp3/ITSu4 by >15%. Primer pair bias was observed in the recovery of certain taxonomic groups; ITS2F/ITSp4 preferentially recovered flowering plants and grasses, whereas ITSp3/ITSu4 recovered more moss taxa. To maximize data recovery and reduce potential bias, we advocate that studies using ITS2 to characterize land plants from environmental samples such as soil use a multiple primer pair approach. Public Library of Science 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162488/ /pubmed/32298321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231436 Text en © 2020 Timpano et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Timpano, Emma K.
Scheible, Melissa K. R.
Meiklejohn, Kelly A.
Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil
title Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil
title_full Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil
title_fullStr Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil
title_short Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil
title_sort optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (its2) for characterizing land plants from soil
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231436
work_keys_str_mv AT timpanoemmak optimizationofthesecondinternaltranscribedspacerits2forcharacterizinglandplantsfromsoil
AT scheiblemelissakr optimizationofthesecondinternaltranscribedspacerits2forcharacterizinglandplantsfromsoil
AT meiklejohnkellya optimizationofthesecondinternaltranscribedspacerits2forcharacterizinglandplantsfromsoil