Cargando…

Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pondorfer, Susanne G., Heinemann, Manuel, Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M., Pfau, Maximilian, Strömer, Annika L., Holz, Frank G., Finger, Robert P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748
_version_ 1783523045786255360
author Pondorfer, Susanne G.
Heinemann, Manuel
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Pfau, Maximilian
Strömer, Annika L.
Holz, Frank G.
Finger, Robert P.
author_facet Pondorfer, Susanne G.
Heinemann, Manuel
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Pfau, Maximilian
Strömer, Annika L.
Holz, Frank G.
Finger, Robert P.
author_sort Pondorfer, Susanne G.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), visual acuity (VA) measured with the Moorfields Vanishing Optotypes Acuity Charts (MAC), contrast sensitivity with the Pelli-Robson test, reading speed using the International Reading Speed texts (IReST) and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry (S-MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy). Groups were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ROC analyses. Linear regression was used to control for confounding. Results showed that all visual function test performances except the IReST were significantly reduced in iAMD patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). These effects did not alter after controlling for age and sex. Best discrimination between iAMD and controls yield the combination of LLVA and contrast sensitivity as well as MAC-VA and contrast sensitivity (ROC area under the curve 0.95 and 0.93, respectively). Our results suggest that LLVA, MAC-VA, contrast sensitivity and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry can capture visual impairment characteristic for iAMD. Best discrimination against iAMD is achieved with a combination of two tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7162506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71625062020-04-21 Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests Pondorfer, Susanne G. Heinemann, Manuel Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Pfau, Maximilian Strömer, Annika L. Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. PLoS One Research Article The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), visual acuity (VA) measured with the Moorfields Vanishing Optotypes Acuity Charts (MAC), contrast sensitivity with the Pelli-Robson test, reading speed using the International Reading Speed texts (IReST) and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry (S-MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy). Groups were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ROC analyses. Linear regression was used to control for confounding. Results showed that all visual function test performances except the IReST were significantly reduced in iAMD patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). These effects did not alter after controlling for age and sex. Best discrimination between iAMD and controls yield the combination of LLVA and contrast sensitivity as well as MAC-VA and contrast sensitivity (ROC area under the curve 0.95 and 0.93, respectively). Our results suggest that LLVA, MAC-VA, contrast sensitivity and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry can capture visual impairment characteristic for iAMD. Best discrimination against iAMD is achieved with a combination of two tests. Public Library of Science 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162506/ /pubmed/32298375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748 Text en © 2020 Pondorfer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pondorfer, Susanne G.
Heinemann, Manuel
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Pfau, Maximilian
Strömer, Annika L.
Holz, Frank G.
Finger, Robert P.
Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests
title Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests
title_full Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests
title_fullStr Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests
title_full_unstemmed Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests
title_short Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests
title_sort detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: a comparison of visual function tests
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748
work_keys_str_mv AT pondorfersusanneg detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT heinemannmanuel detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT wintergerstmaximilianwm detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT pfaumaximilian detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT stromerannikal detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT holzfrankg detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests
AT fingerrobertp detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests