Cargando…
Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748 |
_version_ | 1783523045786255360 |
---|---|
author | Pondorfer, Susanne G. Heinemann, Manuel Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Pfau, Maximilian Strömer, Annika L. Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. |
author_facet | Pondorfer, Susanne G. Heinemann, Manuel Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Pfau, Maximilian Strömer, Annika L. Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. |
author_sort | Pondorfer, Susanne G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), visual acuity (VA) measured with the Moorfields Vanishing Optotypes Acuity Charts (MAC), contrast sensitivity with the Pelli-Robson test, reading speed using the International Reading Speed texts (IReST) and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry (S-MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy). Groups were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ROC analyses. Linear regression was used to control for confounding. Results showed that all visual function test performances except the IReST were significantly reduced in iAMD patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). These effects did not alter after controlling for age and sex. Best discrimination between iAMD and controls yield the combination of LLVA and contrast sensitivity as well as MAC-VA and contrast sensitivity (ROC area under the curve 0.95 and 0.93, respectively). Our results suggest that LLVA, MAC-VA, contrast sensitivity and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry can capture visual impairment characteristic for iAMD. Best discrimination against iAMD is achieved with a combination of two tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7162506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71625062020-04-21 Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests Pondorfer, Susanne G. Heinemann, Manuel Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Pfau, Maximilian Strömer, Annika L. Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. PLoS One Research Article The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of visual function tests in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). A total of 62 subjects (38 patients with iAMD and 24 controls) were included and underwent several functional assessments: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), visual acuity (VA) measured with the Moorfields Vanishing Optotypes Acuity Charts (MAC), contrast sensitivity with the Pelli-Robson test, reading speed using the International Reading Speed texts (IReST) and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry (S-MAIA, CenterVue, Padova, Italy). Groups were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests and ROC analyses. Linear regression was used to control for confounding. Results showed that all visual function test performances except the IReST were significantly reduced in iAMD patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). These effects did not alter after controlling for age and sex. Best discrimination between iAMD and controls yield the combination of LLVA and contrast sensitivity as well as MAC-VA and contrast sensitivity (ROC area under the curve 0.95 and 0.93, respectively). Our results suggest that LLVA, MAC-VA, contrast sensitivity and mesopic and dark-adapted microperimetry can capture visual impairment characteristic for iAMD. Best discrimination against iAMD is achieved with a combination of two tests. Public Library of Science 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162506/ /pubmed/32298375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748 Text en © 2020 Pondorfer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pondorfer, Susanne G. Heinemann, Manuel Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Pfau, Maximilian Strömer, Annika L. Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests |
title | Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests |
title_full | Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests |
title_fullStr | Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests |
title_short | Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests |
title_sort | detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: a comparison of visual function tests |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pondorfersusanneg detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests AT heinemannmanuel detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests AT wintergerstmaximilianwm detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests AT pfaumaximilian detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests AT stromerannikal detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests AT holzfrankg detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests AT fingerrobertp detectingvisionlossinintermediateagerelatedmaculardegenerationacomparisonofvisualfunctiontests |