Cargando…
Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review
BACKGROUND: To investigate if foetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) is useful in preventing foetal metabolic acidosis in labour when ST-analysis of the foetal ECG (STAN ® ) is already being used as a second line technique for intrapartum foetal monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG). DESIGN: Restricted...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universa Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32322830 |
_version_ | 1783523075749314560 |
---|---|
author | Demaegd, HMI Bauters, EGR Page, GH |
author_facet | Demaegd, HMI Bauters, EGR Page, GH |
author_sort | Demaegd, HMI |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate if foetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) is useful in preventing foetal metabolic acidosis in labour when ST-analysis of the foetal ECG (STAN ® ) is already being used as a second line technique for intrapartum foetal monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG). DESIGN: Restricted systematic review. METHODS: Based on a literature search in July 2019, a restricted systematic review was performed. Studies comparing CTG+STAN ® +FBS with CTG+STAN ® , CTG+FBS or CTG only were included. Observational studies allowing FBS in addition to STAN ® reporting the indications, results and neonatal outcomes were included as well. RESULTS: Five randomised controlled trials (RCT) and seven observational trials were analysed. Based on the analysis of data coming from one RCT, FBS identifies foetal acidosis in 9.9% when performed in specific situations. Similarly, in observational trials it was found that in up to 10% of cases where STAN ® registration was less reliable, FBS suggested foetal acidosis. However, there is no evidence that FBS in these cases was capable of preventing metabolic acidosis or its neurological consequences. CONCLUSION: Based on the available literature, no recommendations in favour of combining FBS with STAN ® monitoring can be made. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7162663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Universa Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71626632020-04-22 Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review Demaegd, HMI Bauters, EGR Page, GH Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Paper BACKGROUND: To investigate if foetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) is useful in preventing foetal metabolic acidosis in labour when ST-analysis of the foetal ECG (STAN ® ) is already being used as a second line technique for intrapartum foetal monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG). DESIGN: Restricted systematic review. METHODS: Based on a literature search in July 2019, a restricted systematic review was performed. Studies comparing CTG+STAN ® +FBS with CTG+STAN ® , CTG+FBS or CTG only were included. Observational studies allowing FBS in addition to STAN ® reporting the indications, results and neonatal outcomes were included as well. RESULTS: Five randomised controlled trials (RCT) and seven observational trials were analysed. Based on the analysis of data coming from one RCT, FBS identifies foetal acidosis in 9.9% when performed in specific situations. Similarly, in observational trials it was found that in up to 10% of cases where STAN ® registration was less reliable, FBS suggested foetal acidosis. However, there is no evidence that FBS in these cases was capable of preventing metabolic acidosis or its neurological consequences. CONCLUSION: Based on the available literature, no recommendations in favour of combining FBS with STAN ® monitoring can be made. Universa Press 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7162663/ /pubmed/32322830 Text en Copyright © 2019 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Demaegd, HMI Bauters, EGR Page, GH Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review |
title | Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review |
title_full | Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review |
title_fullStr | Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review |
title_short | Foetal scalp blood sampling and ST-analysis of the foetal ECG for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review |
title_sort | foetal scalp blood sampling and st-analysis of the foetal ecg for intrapartum foetal monitoring: a restricted systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32322830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demaegdhmi foetalscalpbloodsamplingandstanalysisofthefoetalecgforintrapartumfoetalmonitoringarestrictedsystematicreview AT bautersegr foetalscalpbloodsamplingandstanalysisofthefoetalecgforintrapartumfoetalmonitoringarestrictedsystematicreview AT pagegh foetalscalpbloodsamplingandstanalysisofthefoetalecgforintrapartumfoetalmonitoringarestrictedsystematicreview |