Cargando…

Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice

Background The physicians’ acceptance rate of pharmacists’ interventions to improve pharmacotherapy can vary depending on the setting. The acceptance rate of interventions proposed by pharmacists located in the hospital pharmacy over the telephone and factors associated with acceptance are largely u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaal, Rianne J., den Haak, Edwin W., Andrinopoulou, Elrozy R., van Gelder, Teun, Vulto, Arnold G., van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-00970-0
_version_ 1783523099708227584
author Zaal, Rianne J.
den Haak, Edwin W.
Andrinopoulou, Elrozy R.
van Gelder, Teun
Vulto, Arnold G.
van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A.
author_facet Zaal, Rianne J.
den Haak, Edwin W.
Andrinopoulou, Elrozy R.
van Gelder, Teun
Vulto, Arnold G.
van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A.
author_sort Zaal, Rianne J.
collection PubMed
description Background The physicians’ acceptance rate of pharmacists’ interventions to improve pharmacotherapy can vary depending on the setting. The acceptance rate of interventions proposed by pharmacists located in the hospital pharmacy over the telephone and factors associated with acceptance are largely unknown. Objective To determine the physicians’ acceptance rate of pharmacists’ interventions proposed over the telephone in daily hospital practice and to identify factors associated with acceptance. Setting A retrospective case–control study was performed concerning adult patients admitted to a university hospital in the Netherlands. Method Pharmacists’ interventions, based on alerts for drug–drug interactions and drug dosing in patients with renal impairment, recorded between January 2012 and June 2013 that were communicated over the telephone were included. Factors associated with physicians’ acceptance were identified with the use of a mixed-effects logistic model. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the proportion of accepted interventions. Results A total of 841 interventions were included. Physicians accepted 599 interventions, resulting in an acceptance rate of 71.2%. The mixed-effects logistic model showed that acceptance was significantly associated with the number of prescribed drugs (16 to ≤ 20 drugs OR(adj) 1.88; 95% CI 1.05–3.35, > 20 drugs OR(adj) 2.90; 95% CI 1.41–5.96, compared to ≤ 10 drugs) and the severity of the drug-related problem (problem without potential harm OR(adj) 6.36; 95% CI 1.89–21.38; problem with potential harm OR 6.78; 95% CI 2.09–21.99, compared to clinically irrelevant problems), and inversely associated with continuation of pre-admission treatment (OR(adj) 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.87). Conclusion Over the study period, the majority of pharmacists’ interventions proposed over the telephone were accepted by physicians. The probability for acceptance increased for patients with an increasing number of medication orders, for clinically relevant problems and for problems related to treatment initiated during admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7162822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71628222020-04-23 Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice Zaal, Rianne J. den Haak, Edwin W. Andrinopoulou, Elrozy R. van Gelder, Teun Vulto, Arnold G. van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background The physicians’ acceptance rate of pharmacists’ interventions to improve pharmacotherapy can vary depending on the setting. The acceptance rate of interventions proposed by pharmacists located in the hospital pharmacy over the telephone and factors associated with acceptance are largely unknown. Objective To determine the physicians’ acceptance rate of pharmacists’ interventions proposed over the telephone in daily hospital practice and to identify factors associated with acceptance. Setting A retrospective case–control study was performed concerning adult patients admitted to a university hospital in the Netherlands. Method Pharmacists’ interventions, based on alerts for drug–drug interactions and drug dosing in patients with renal impairment, recorded between January 2012 and June 2013 that were communicated over the telephone were included. Factors associated with physicians’ acceptance were identified with the use of a mixed-effects logistic model. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the proportion of accepted interventions. Results A total of 841 interventions were included. Physicians accepted 599 interventions, resulting in an acceptance rate of 71.2%. The mixed-effects logistic model showed that acceptance was significantly associated with the number of prescribed drugs (16 to ≤ 20 drugs OR(adj) 1.88; 95% CI 1.05–3.35, > 20 drugs OR(adj) 2.90; 95% CI 1.41–5.96, compared to ≤ 10 drugs) and the severity of the drug-related problem (problem without potential harm OR(adj) 6.36; 95% CI 1.89–21.38; problem with potential harm OR 6.78; 95% CI 2.09–21.99, compared to clinically irrelevant problems), and inversely associated with continuation of pre-admission treatment (OR(adj) 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.87). Conclusion Over the study period, the majority of pharmacists’ interventions proposed over the telephone were accepted by physicians. The probability for acceptance increased for patients with an increasing number of medication orders, for clinically relevant problems and for problems related to treatment initiated during admission. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7162822/ /pubmed/32026348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-00970-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zaal, Rianne J.
den Haak, Edwin W.
Andrinopoulou, Elrozy R.
van Gelder, Teun
Vulto, Arnold G.
van den Bemt, Patricia M. L. A.
Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice
title Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice
title_full Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice
title_fullStr Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice
title_full_unstemmed Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice
title_short Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice
title_sort physicians’ acceptance of pharmacists’ interventions in daily hospital practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-00970-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zaalriannej physiciansacceptanceofpharmacistsinterventionsindailyhospitalpractice
AT denhaakedwinw physiciansacceptanceofpharmacistsinterventionsindailyhospitalpractice
AT andrinopoulouelrozyr physiciansacceptanceofpharmacistsinterventionsindailyhospitalpractice
AT vangelderteun physiciansacceptanceofpharmacistsinterventionsindailyhospitalpractice
AT vultoarnoldg physiciansacceptanceofpharmacistsinterventionsindailyhospitalpractice
AT vandenbemtpatriciamla physiciansacceptanceofpharmacistsinterventionsindailyhospitalpractice