Cargando…

Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task

Repetitive feather pecking (FP) where birds peck and pull out feathers of conspecifics could reflect motor impulsivity through a lack of behavioural inhibition. We assessed motor impulsivity in female chickens (n = 20) during a Go/No-Go task where birds had to peck (Go) or inhibit pecks (No-Go) appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinsius, Jennifer, van Staaveren, Nienke, Kwon, Isabelle Young, Li, Angeli, Kjaer, Joergen B., Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63618-z
_version_ 1783523112002781184
author Heinsius, Jennifer
van Staaveren, Nienke
Kwon, Isabelle Young
Li, Angeli
Kjaer, Joergen B.
Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra
author_facet Heinsius, Jennifer
van Staaveren, Nienke
Kwon, Isabelle Young
Li, Angeli
Kjaer, Joergen B.
Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra
author_sort Heinsius, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Repetitive feather pecking (FP) where birds peck and pull out feathers of conspecifics could reflect motor impulsivity through a lack of behavioural inhibition. We assessed motor impulsivity in female chickens (n = 20) during a Go/No-Go task where birds had to peck (Go) or inhibit pecks (No-Go) appropriately to obtain a food reward, depending on visual cues in an operant chamber. Birds were selected to show divergent FP performance based on their genotype (high predisposition for FP or unselected control line) and phenotype (peckers or non-peckers). Genotype, phenotype, and its interaction did not affect the number of pre-cue responses, percentage of responses during No-Go cues (false alarms), or efficiency (number of rewards over number of responses). We present the first documentation of a Go/No-Go task to measure the ability of birds genetically and phenotypically selected for FP activity to inhibit a prepotent motor response. Results indicate that the repetitive motor action of FP does not reflect impulsivity and is not genetically linked to a lack of behavioural inhibition as measured in a Go/No-Go task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7162881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71628812020-04-22 Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task Heinsius, Jennifer van Staaveren, Nienke Kwon, Isabelle Young Li, Angeli Kjaer, Joergen B. Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra Sci Rep Article Repetitive feather pecking (FP) where birds peck and pull out feathers of conspecifics could reflect motor impulsivity through a lack of behavioural inhibition. We assessed motor impulsivity in female chickens (n = 20) during a Go/No-Go task where birds had to peck (Go) or inhibit pecks (No-Go) appropriately to obtain a food reward, depending on visual cues in an operant chamber. Birds were selected to show divergent FP performance based on their genotype (high predisposition for FP or unselected control line) and phenotype (peckers or non-peckers). Genotype, phenotype, and its interaction did not affect the number of pre-cue responses, percentage of responses during No-Go cues (false alarms), or efficiency (number of rewards over number of responses). We present the first documentation of a Go/No-Go task to measure the ability of birds genetically and phenotypically selected for FP activity to inhibit a prepotent motor response. Results indicate that the repetitive motor action of FP does not reflect impulsivity and is not genetically linked to a lack of behavioural inhibition as measured in a Go/No-Go task. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162881/ /pubmed/32300207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63618-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Heinsius, Jennifer
van Staaveren, Nienke
Kwon, Isabelle Young
Li, Angeli
Kjaer, Joergen B.
Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra
Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task
title Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task
title_full Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task
title_fullStr Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task
title_full_unstemmed Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task
title_short Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task
title_sort chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a go/no-go task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63618-z
work_keys_str_mv AT heinsiusjennifer chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask
AT vanstaaverennienke chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask
AT kwonisabelleyoung chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask
AT liangeli chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask
AT kjaerjoergenb chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask
AT harlandermatauschekalexandra chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask