Cargando…
Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task
Repetitive feather pecking (FP) where birds peck and pull out feathers of conspecifics could reflect motor impulsivity through a lack of behavioural inhibition. We assessed motor impulsivity in female chickens (n = 20) during a Go/No-Go task where birds had to peck (Go) or inhibit pecks (No-Go) appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63618-z |
_version_ | 1783523112002781184 |
---|---|
author | Heinsius, Jennifer van Staaveren, Nienke Kwon, Isabelle Young Li, Angeli Kjaer, Joergen B. Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra |
author_facet | Heinsius, Jennifer van Staaveren, Nienke Kwon, Isabelle Young Li, Angeli Kjaer, Joergen B. Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra |
author_sort | Heinsius, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repetitive feather pecking (FP) where birds peck and pull out feathers of conspecifics could reflect motor impulsivity through a lack of behavioural inhibition. We assessed motor impulsivity in female chickens (n = 20) during a Go/No-Go task where birds had to peck (Go) or inhibit pecks (No-Go) appropriately to obtain a food reward, depending on visual cues in an operant chamber. Birds were selected to show divergent FP performance based on their genotype (high predisposition for FP or unselected control line) and phenotype (peckers or non-peckers). Genotype, phenotype, and its interaction did not affect the number of pre-cue responses, percentage of responses during No-Go cues (false alarms), or efficiency (number of rewards over number of responses). We present the first documentation of a Go/No-Go task to measure the ability of birds genetically and phenotypically selected for FP activity to inhibit a prepotent motor response. Results indicate that the repetitive motor action of FP does not reflect impulsivity and is not genetically linked to a lack of behavioural inhibition as measured in a Go/No-Go task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7162881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71628812020-04-22 Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task Heinsius, Jennifer van Staaveren, Nienke Kwon, Isabelle Young Li, Angeli Kjaer, Joergen B. Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra Sci Rep Article Repetitive feather pecking (FP) where birds peck and pull out feathers of conspecifics could reflect motor impulsivity through a lack of behavioural inhibition. We assessed motor impulsivity in female chickens (n = 20) during a Go/No-Go task where birds had to peck (Go) or inhibit pecks (No-Go) appropriately to obtain a food reward, depending on visual cues in an operant chamber. Birds were selected to show divergent FP performance based on their genotype (high predisposition for FP or unselected control line) and phenotype (peckers or non-peckers). Genotype, phenotype, and its interaction did not affect the number of pre-cue responses, percentage of responses during No-Go cues (false alarms), or efficiency (number of rewards over number of responses). We present the first documentation of a Go/No-Go task to measure the ability of birds genetically and phenotypically selected for FP activity to inhibit a prepotent motor response. Results indicate that the repetitive motor action of FP does not reflect impulsivity and is not genetically linked to a lack of behavioural inhibition as measured in a Go/No-Go task. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162881/ /pubmed/32300207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63618-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Heinsius, Jennifer van Staaveren, Nienke Kwon, Isabelle Young Li, Angeli Kjaer, Joergen B. Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task |
title | Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task |
title_full | Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task |
title_fullStr | Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task |
title_full_unstemmed | Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task |
title_short | Chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a Go/No-Go task |
title_sort | chickens selected for feather pecking can inhibit prepotent motor responses in a go/no-go task |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63618-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinsiusjennifer chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask AT vanstaaverennienke chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask AT kwonisabelleyoung chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask AT liangeli chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask AT kjaerjoergenb chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask AT harlandermatauschekalexandra chickensselectedforfeatherpeckingcaninhibitprepotentmotorresponsesinagonogotask |