Cargando…
Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds
Somatosensory processing can be probed empirically through vibrotactile psychophysical experiments. Psychophysical approaches are valuable for investigating both normal and abnormal tactile function in healthy and clinical populations. To date, the test-retest reliability of vibrotactile detection a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63208-z |
_version_ | 1783523133682089984 |
---|---|
author | Mikkelsen, Mark He, Jason Tommerdahl, Mark Edden, Richard A. E. Mostofsky, Stewart H. Puts, Nicolaas A. J. |
author_facet | Mikkelsen, Mark He, Jason Tommerdahl, Mark Edden, Richard A. E. Mostofsky, Stewart H. Puts, Nicolaas A. J. |
author_sort | Mikkelsen, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | Somatosensory processing can be probed empirically through vibrotactile psychophysical experiments. Psychophysical approaches are valuable for investigating both normal and abnormal tactile function in healthy and clinical populations. To date, the test-retest reliability of vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds has yet to be established. This study sought to assess the reproducibility of vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds in human adults using an established vibrotactile psychophysical battery. Fifteen healthy adults underwent three repeat sessions of an eleven-task battery that measured a range of vibrotactile measures, including reaction time, detection threshold, amplitude and frequency discrimination, and temporal order judgement. Coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the measures in each task. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test for length and training effects and differences between tasks within the same domain. Reaction times were shown to be the most reproducible (ICC: ~0.9) followed by detection thresholds (ICC: ~0.7). Frequency discrimination thresholds were the least reproducible (ICC: ~0.3). As reported in prior studies, significant differences in measures between related tasks were also found, demonstrating the reproducibility of task-related effects. These findings show that vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds are reliable, further supporting the use of psychophysical experiments to probe tactile function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7162987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71629872020-04-23 Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds Mikkelsen, Mark He, Jason Tommerdahl, Mark Edden, Richard A. E. Mostofsky, Stewart H. Puts, Nicolaas A. J. Sci Rep Article Somatosensory processing can be probed empirically through vibrotactile psychophysical experiments. Psychophysical approaches are valuable for investigating both normal and abnormal tactile function in healthy and clinical populations. To date, the test-retest reliability of vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds has yet to be established. This study sought to assess the reproducibility of vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds in human adults using an established vibrotactile psychophysical battery. Fifteen healthy adults underwent three repeat sessions of an eleven-task battery that measured a range of vibrotactile measures, including reaction time, detection threshold, amplitude and frequency discrimination, and temporal order judgement. Coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the measures in each task. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test for length and training effects and differences between tasks within the same domain. Reaction times were shown to be the most reproducible (ICC: ~0.9) followed by detection thresholds (ICC: ~0.7). Frequency discrimination thresholds were the least reproducible (ICC: ~0.3). As reported in prior studies, significant differences in measures between related tasks were also found, demonstrating the reproducibility of task-related effects. These findings show that vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds are reliable, further supporting the use of psychophysical experiments to probe tactile function. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7162987/ /pubmed/32300187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63208-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Mikkelsen, Mark He, Jason Tommerdahl, Mark Edden, Richard A. E. Mostofsky, Stewart H. Puts, Nicolaas A. J. Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds |
title | Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds |
title_full | Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds |
title_short | Reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds |
title_sort | reproducibility of flutter-range vibrotactile detection and discrimination thresholds |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63208-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikkelsenmark reproducibilityofflutterrangevibrotactiledetectionanddiscriminationthresholds AT hejason reproducibilityofflutterrangevibrotactiledetectionanddiscriminationthresholds AT tommerdahlmark reproducibilityofflutterrangevibrotactiledetectionanddiscriminationthresholds AT eddenrichardae reproducibilityofflutterrangevibrotactiledetectionanddiscriminationthresholds AT mostofskystewarth reproducibilityofflutterrangevibrotactiledetectionanddiscriminationthresholds AT putsnicolaasaj reproducibilityofflutterrangevibrotactiledetectionanddiscriminationthresholds |