Cargando…

Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is becoming an important part of internal medicine (IM) residency training. Achieving competency requires performing a large volume of clinical exams which can be difficult within the constraints of residency. Often-cited barriers include insufficient res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glogoza, Matt, Urbach, Jonathan, Rosborough, Terry K., Olet, Susan, St. Hill, Catherine A., Smith, Claire S., Tierney, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7163000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-020-00165-8
_version_ 1783523136007831552
author Glogoza, Matt
Urbach, Jonathan
Rosborough, Terry K.
Olet, Susan
St. Hill, Catherine A.
Smith, Claire S.
Tierney, David M.
author_facet Glogoza, Matt
Urbach, Jonathan
Rosborough, Terry K.
Olet, Susan
St. Hill, Catherine A.
Smith, Claire S.
Tierney, David M.
author_sort Glogoza, Matt
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is becoming an important part of internal medicine (IM) residency training. Achieving competency requires performing a large volume of clinical exams which can be difficult within the constraints of residency. Often-cited barriers include insufficient resident time and the interruption of daily workflow. Despite availability of hospital station-based laptop ultrasound machines, we hypothesized that the addition of ward team-based tablet ultrasound devices would lower barriers and increase clinical POCUS volume within an IM residency POCUS curriculum at a 670-bed, quaternary care, teaching hospital. IM resident POCUS volumes and characteristics during an 18-mo. baseline (station-based laptop devices only) period were compared to matched months during the intervention (station-based + tablet). RESULTS: Total patients examined with POCUS by 6 inpatient resident teams during the 18-mo. baseline and intervention periods were 1386 and 1853, respectively. Patients examined per month increased during the intervention by 34% (77 vs. 103, p = 0.002). The number of areas (e.g., abdominal, cardiac) and items (e.g., bladder, pericardial effusion) examined per month increased by 27% (p = 0.021) and 23% (p = 0.073), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A combined program infrastructure of station-based laptop and “in-the-pocket” tablet ultrasound devices lowered common POCUS barriers of inadequate time and workflow disruption for IM residents and resulted in a meaningful increase of exams within a longitudinal residency-based training program where station-based laptop devices already existed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7163000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71630002020-04-24 Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study Glogoza, Matt Urbach, Jonathan Rosborough, Terry K. Olet, Susan St. Hill, Catherine A. Smith, Claire S. Tierney, David M. Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is becoming an important part of internal medicine (IM) residency training. Achieving competency requires performing a large volume of clinical exams which can be difficult within the constraints of residency. Often-cited barriers include insufficient resident time and the interruption of daily workflow. Despite availability of hospital station-based laptop ultrasound machines, we hypothesized that the addition of ward team-based tablet ultrasound devices would lower barriers and increase clinical POCUS volume within an IM residency POCUS curriculum at a 670-bed, quaternary care, teaching hospital. IM resident POCUS volumes and characteristics during an 18-mo. baseline (station-based laptop devices only) period were compared to matched months during the intervention (station-based + tablet). RESULTS: Total patients examined with POCUS by 6 inpatient resident teams during the 18-mo. baseline and intervention periods were 1386 and 1853, respectively. Patients examined per month increased during the intervention by 34% (77 vs. 103, p = 0.002). The number of areas (e.g., abdominal, cardiac) and items (e.g., bladder, pericardial effusion) examined per month increased by 27% (p = 0.021) and 23% (p = 0.073), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A combined program infrastructure of station-based laptop and “in-the-pocket” tablet ultrasound devices lowered common POCUS barriers of inadequate time and workflow disruption for IM residents and resulted in a meaningful increase of exams within a longitudinal residency-based training program where station-based laptop devices already existed. Springer Milan 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7163000/ /pubmed/32300979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-020-00165-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Glogoza, Matt
Urbach, Jonathan
Rosborough, Terry K.
Olet, Susan
St. Hill, Catherine A.
Smith, Claire S.
Tierney, David M.
Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study
title Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study
title_full Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study
title_short Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study
title_sort tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7163000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-020-00165-8
work_keys_str_mv AT glogozamatt tabletvsstationbasedlaptopultrasounddevicesincreasesinternalmedicineresidentpointofcareultrasoundperformanceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT urbachjonathan tabletvsstationbasedlaptopultrasounddevicesincreasesinternalmedicineresidentpointofcareultrasoundperformanceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT rosboroughterryk tabletvsstationbasedlaptopultrasounddevicesincreasesinternalmedicineresidentpointofcareultrasoundperformanceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT oletsusan tabletvsstationbasedlaptopultrasounddevicesincreasesinternalmedicineresidentpointofcareultrasoundperformanceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sthillcatherinea tabletvsstationbasedlaptopultrasounddevicesincreasesinternalmedicineresidentpointofcareultrasoundperformanceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT smithclaires tabletvsstationbasedlaptopultrasounddevicesincreasesinternalmedicineresidentpointofcareultrasoundperformanceaprospectivecohortstudy
AT tierneydavidm tabletvsstationbasedlaptopultrasounddevicesincreasesinternalmedicineresidentpointofcareultrasoundperformanceaprospectivecohortstudy