Cargando…

Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda

Introduction: In two high-volume government hospitals, their two affiliated health facilities, and two additional health facilities, we developed and implemented postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) and postpartum (PP) implant promotional counseling and service delivery procedures between May-July...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall, Kristin M., Ingabire, Rosine, Allen, Susan, Karita, Etienne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7163922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328566
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12858.4
_version_ 1783523229517742080
author Wall, Kristin M.
Ingabire, Rosine
Allen, Susan
Karita, Etienne
author_facet Wall, Kristin M.
Ingabire, Rosine
Allen, Susan
Karita, Etienne
author_sort Wall, Kristin M.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: In two high-volume government hospitals, their two affiliated health facilities, and two additional health facilities, we developed and implemented postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) and postpartum (PP) implant promotional counseling and service delivery procedures between May-July 2017 in Kigali, Rwanda. Between August 2017 and July 2018, 9,073 pregnant women received PPIUD/PP implant promotions who later delivered in one of our selected facilities. Of those, 2,633 had PPIUDs inserted, and 955 had PP implants inserted. The goal of the present analysis is to detail implementation expenditures and estimate incremental costs per insertion and couple years of protection (CYP) for PPIUD and PP implant users. Methods: We detail the incremental costs during the implementation from the health system perspective (including both the implementation costs and the cost of contraceptive methods) and use of standard methods to estimate the cost per insertion and CYP for PPIUD and PP implant users. In addition to the incremental costs of labor and supplies, the costs of promotional activities are included. Research costs for formative work were excluded. Results: A total of $74,147 USD was spent on the implementation between August 2017 and July 2018. The largest expense (34% of total expenses) went toward personnel, including doctoral-level, administrative, data management and nurse counseling staff. Training for PPIUD and implant providers and promoters comprised 8% of total expenses. Recruitment and reimbursements comprised 6% of expenses. Costs of implants to the government comprised 12% of the expenses, much higher than the cost of IUDs (1%). Costs per insertion were $25/PPIUDs and $77/PP implant. Costs per CYP were $6/PPIUDs and $21/PP implant.  Conclusion: Understanding the cost per PPIUD/PP implant inserted and CYP can help to inform the cost of scaling up PPIUD/PP implant service implementation activities and resource allocation decision-making by the Rwandan Ministry of Health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7163922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71639222020-04-22 Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda Wall, Kristin M. Ingabire, Rosine Allen, Susan Karita, Etienne Gates Open Res Research Note Introduction: In two high-volume government hospitals, their two affiliated health facilities, and two additional health facilities, we developed and implemented postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) and postpartum (PP) implant promotional counseling and service delivery procedures between May-July 2017 in Kigali, Rwanda. Between August 2017 and July 2018, 9,073 pregnant women received PPIUD/PP implant promotions who later delivered in one of our selected facilities. Of those, 2,633 had PPIUDs inserted, and 955 had PP implants inserted. The goal of the present analysis is to detail implementation expenditures and estimate incremental costs per insertion and couple years of protection (CYP) for PPIUD and PP implant users. Methods: We detail the incremental costs during the implementation from the health system perspective (including both the implementation costs and the cost of contraceptive methods) and use of standard methods to estimate the cost per insertion and CYP for PPIUD and PP implant users. In addition to the incremental costs of labor and supplies, the costs of promotional activities are included. Research costs for formative work were excluded. Results: A total of $74,147 USD was spent on the implementation between August 2017 and July 2018. The largest expense (34% of total expenses) went toward personnel, including doctoral-level, administrative, data management and nurse counseling staff. Training for PPIUD and implant providers and promoters comprised 8% of total expenses. Recruitment and reimbursements comprised 6% of expenses. Costs of implants to the government comprised 12% of the expenses, much higher than the cost of IUDs (1%). Costs per insertion were $25/PPIUDs and $77/PP implant. Costs per CYP were $6/PPIUDs and $21/PP implant.  Conclusion: Understanding the cost per PPIUD/PP implant inserted and CYP can help to inform the cost of scaling up PPIUD/PP implant service implementation activities and resource allocation decision-making by the Rwandan Ministry of Health. F1000 Research Limited 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7163922/ /pubmed/32328566 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12858.4 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Wall KM et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Note
Wall, Kristin M.
Ingabire, Rosine
Allen, Susan
Karita, Etienne
Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda
title Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda
title_full Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda
title_fullStr Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda
title_full_unstemmed Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda
title_short Cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in Kigali, Rwanda
title_sort cost per insertion and couple year of protection for postpartum intrauterine devices and implants provided during service scale-up in kigali, rwanda
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7163922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328566
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12858.4
work_keys_str_mv AT wallkristinm costperinsertionandcoupleyearofprotectionforpostpartumintrauterinedevicesandimplantsprovidedduringservicescaleupinkigalirwanda
AT ingabirerosine costperinsertionandcoupleyearofprotectionforpostpartumintrauterinedevicesandimplantsprovidedduringservicescaleupinkigalirwanda
AT allensusan costperinsertionandcoupleyearofprotectionforpostpartumintrauterinedevicesandimplantsprovidedduringservicescaleupinkigalirwanda
AT karitaetienne costperinsertionandcoupleyearofprotectionforpostpartumintrauterinedevicesandimplantsprovidedduringservicescaleupinkigalirwanda