Cargando…

Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: To restore rotation center exactly in revision hip arthroplasty is technically challenging, especially in Paprosky type III. The technical difficulty is attributable to the complicated acetabular bone defect. In this study, we discussed the method of restoring rotation center in revision...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Heng, Zhou, Jiansheng, Liu, Yang, Guan, Jianzhong, Ding, Hai, Wang, Zhiyan, Dong, Qirong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01670-1
_version_ 1783523242127917056
author Zhang, Heng
Zhou, Jiansheng
Liu, Yang
Guan, Jianzhong
Ding, Hai
Wang, Zhiyan
Dong, Qirong
author_facet Zhang, Heng
Zhou, Jiansheng
Liu, Yang
Guan, Jianzhong
Ding, Hai
Wang, Zhiyan
Dong, Qirong
author_sort Zhang, Heng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To restore rotation center exactly in revision hip arthroplasty is technically challenging, especially in Paprosky type III. The technical difficulty is attributable to the complicated acetabular bone defect. In this study, we discussed the method of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty and reported the clinical and radiological outcome of mid-term and long-term follow-up. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 45 patients (48 hips) who underwent revision hip arthroplasty, in which 35 cases (35 hips) were available for complete follow-up data. During the operation, the acetabular bone defect was reconstructed by impaction morselized bone graft, and the hip rotation center was restored by using remnant Harris fossa and acetabular notches as the marks. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score. Pelvis plain x-ray was used to assess implant migration, stability of implants, and incorporation of the bone graft to host bone. RESULT: The average follow-up duration was 97.60 months (range 72–168 months). The average Harris hip score improved from 29.54 ± 10.87 preoperatively to 83.77 ± 5.78 at the last follow-up. The vertical distance of hip rotation center measured on pelvis x-ray was restored to normal, with the mean distance (15.24 ± 1.31) mm (range 12.4~17.3 mm). The mean loss of vertical distance of hip rotation center was (2.21 ± 0.72) mm (range 1.1 ~ 5.3 mm) at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome can be obtained through restoring hip rotation center by using remnant Harris fossa and acetabular notches as the anatomical marks in revision hip arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71641812020-04-22 Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty Zhang, Heng Zhou, Jiansheng Liu, Yang Guan, Jianzhong Ding, Hai Wang, Zhiyan Dong, Qirong J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To restore rotation center exactly in revision hip arthroplasty is technically challenging, especially in Paprosky type III. The technical difficulty is attributable to the complicated acetabular bone defect. In this study, we discussed the method of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty and reported the clinical and radiological outcome of mid-term and long-term follow-up. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 45 patients (48 hips) who underwent revision hip arthroplasty, in which 35 cases (35 hips) were available for complete follow-up data. During the operation, the acetabular bone defect was reconstructed by impaction morselized bone graft, and the hip rotation center was restored by using remnant Harris fossa and acetabular notches as the marks. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris hip score. Pelvis plain x-ray was used to assess implant migration, stability of implants, and incorporation of the bone graft to host bone. RESULT: The average follow-up duration was 97.60 months (range 72–168 months). The average Harris hip score improved from 29.54 ± 10.87 preoperatively to 83.77 ± 5.78 at the last follow-up. The vertical distance of hip rotation center measured on pelvis x-ray was restored to normal, with the mean distance (15.24 ± 1.31) mm (range 12.4~17.3 mm). The mean loss of vertical distance of hip rotation center was (2.21 ± 0.72) mm (range 1.1 ~ 5.3 mm) at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome can be obtained through restoring hip rotation center by using remnant Harris fossa and acetabular notches as the anatomical marks in revision hip arthroplasty. BioMed Central 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7164181/ /pubmed/32299463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01670-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Heng
Zhou, Jiansheng
Liu, Yang
Guan, Jianzhong
Ding, Hai
Wang, Zhiyan
Dong, Qirong
Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
title Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
title_full Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
title_short Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
title_sort mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01670-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangheng midtermandlongtermresultsofrestoringrotationcenterinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT zhoujiansheng midtermandlongtermresultsofrestoringrotationcenterinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT liuyang midtermandlongtermresultsofrestoringrotationcenterinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT guanjianzhong midtermandlongtermresultsofrestoringrotationcenterinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT dinghai midtermandlongtermresultsofrestoringrotationcenterinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT wangzhiyan midtermandlongtermresultsofrestoringrotationcenterinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT dongqirong midtermandlongtermresultsofrestoringrotationcenterinrevisionhiparthroplasty