Cargando…

A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016

BACKGROUND: Primary care is likely to see the highest number of Lyme disease patients. Despite this, there is limited published data regarding Lyme disease patients accessing primary care in the UK. We aim to describe trends in the incidence of a new diagnosis, and demographics of patients identifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tulloch, John S. P., Christley, Robert M., Radford, Alan D., Warner, Jenny C., Beadsworth, Mike B. J., Beeching, Nick J., Vivancos, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05018-2
_version_ 1783523256166252544
author Tulloch, John S. P.
Christley, Robert M.
Radford, Alan D.
Warner, Jenny C.
Beadsworth, Mike B. J.
Beeching, Nick J.
Vivancos, Roberto
author_facet Tulloch, John S. P.
Christley, Robert M.
Radford, Alan D.
Warner, Jenny C.
Beadsworth, Mike B. J.
Beeching, Nick J.
Vivancos, Roberto
author_sort Tulloch, John S. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care is likely to see the highest number of Lyme disease patients. Despite this, there is limited published data regarding Lyme disease patients accessing primary care in the UK. We aim to describe trends in the incidence of a new diagnosis, and demographics of patients identified in a primary care electronic health database. METHODS: A descriptive epidemiological study of Lyme disease coded patients in UK primary care. 3725 patients coded for Lyme disease during 1998–2016 were identified within The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Incidence rates and the demographics of cases identified were described. Poisson regression was used to analyse socio-demographic characteristics of the cases. RESULTS: There was an increase in annual crude incidence rates, peaking in 2015 at 5.47 (95% CI 4.85–6.14) cases per 100,000 population per year. Multivariable analysis showed there were significant differences in the ages of those affected, incidence of a new diagnosis rose as deprivation levels improved, and that there was a higher incidence of cases living in rural areas compared to urban areas. There was no significant difference between sexes for the UK. Cases were significantly more likely to identify with being white compared to the national population. CONCLUSIONS: An increasing incidence of patients newly coded with Lyme disease related Read codes was identified using data from a UK national primary care database. By comparing these incidence figures with national laboratory-confirmed surveillance data, a multiplication factor of 2.35 (95%CI 1.81–2.88) can be calculated in order to estimate the annual number of cases seen in primary care. The significant socio-demographic variables associated with a Lyme disease diagnosis likely reflect a complex interplay of socio-economic issues, which needs to be further explored. Future work is needed to examine the treatment and management of patients within this database.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71642442020-04-22 A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016 Tulloch, John S. P. Christley, Robert M. Radford, Alan D. Warner, Jenny C. Beadsworth, Mike B. J. Beeching, Nick J. Vivancos, Roberto BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care is likely to see the highest number of Lyme disease patients. Despite this, there is limited published data regarding Lyme disease patients accessing primary care in the UK. We aim to describe trends in the incidence of a new diagnosis, and demographics of patients identified in a primary care electronic health database. METHODS: A descriptive epidemiological study of Lyme disease coded patients in UK primary care. 3725 patients coded for Lyme disease during 1998–2016 were identified within The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Incidence rates and the demographics of cases identified were described. Poisson regression was used to analyse socio-demographic characteristics of the cases. RESULTS: There was an increase in annual crude incidence rates, peaking in 2015 at 5.47 (95% CI 4.85–6.14) cases per 100,000 population per year. Multivariable analysis showed there were significant differences in the ages of those affected, incidence of a new diagnosis rose as deprivation levels improved, and that there was a higher incidence of cases living in rural areas compared to urban areas. There was no significant difference between sexes for the UK. Cases were significantly more likely to identify with being white compared to the national population. CONCLUSIONS: An increasing incidence of patients newly coded with Lyme disease related Read codes was identified using data from a UK national primary care database. By comparing these incidence figures with national laboratory-confirmed surveillance data, a multiplication factor of 2.35 (95%CI 1.81–2.88) can be calculated in order to estimate the annual number of cases seen in primary care. The significant socio-demographic variables associated with a Lyme disease diagnosis likely reflect a complex interplay of socio-economic issues, which needs to be further explored. Future work is needed to examine the treatment and management of patients within this database. BioMed Central 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7164244/ /pubmed/32299372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05018-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tulloch, John S. P.
Christley, Robert M.
Radford, Alan D.
Warner, Jenny C.
Beadsworth, Mike B. J.
Beeching, Nick J.
Vivancos, Roberto
A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016
title A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016
title_full A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016
title_fullStr A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016
title_full_unstemmed A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016
title_short A descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed Lyme disease cases in a UK primary care cohort, 1998–2016
title_sort descriptive epidemiological study of the incidence of newly diagnosed lyme disease cases in a uk primary care cohort, 1998–2016
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05018-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tullochjohnsp adescriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT christleyrobertm adescriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT radfordaland adescriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT warnerjennyc adescriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT beadsworthmikebj adescriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT beechingnickj adescriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT vivancosroberto adescriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT tullochjohnsp descriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT christleyrobertm descriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT radfordaland descriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT warnerjennyc descriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT beadsworthmikebj descriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT beechingnickj descriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016
AT vivancosroberto descriptiveepidemiologicalstudyoftheincidenceofnewlydiagnosedlymediseasecasesinaukprimarycarecohort19982016