Cargando…

In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A novel sodium fluoride toothpaste containing lactate ion and polyvinylmethylether-maleic anhydride has been developed to promote enamel remineralisation and resistance to demineralisation. In this in situ study, we compared this toothpaste (‘Test’) with a stannous fluoride-zinc citrate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Creeth, Jonathan E., Burnett, Gary R., Souverain, Audrey, Gomez-Pereira, Paola, Zero, Domenick T., Lippert, Frank, Hara, Anderson T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01081-y
_version_ 1783523266311225344
author Creeth, Jonathan E.
Burnett, Gary R.
Souverain, Audrey
Gomez-Pereira, Paola
Zero, Domenick T.
Lippert, Frank
Hara, Anderson T.
author_facet Creeth, Jonathan E.
Burnett, Gary R.
Souverain, Audrey
Gomez-Pereira, Paola
Zero, Domenick T.
Lippert, Frank
Hara, Anderson T.
author_sort Creeth, Jonathan E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A novel sodium fluoride toothpaste containing lactate ion and polyvinylmethylether-maleic anhydride has been developed to promote enamel remineralisation and resistance to demineralisation. In this in situ study, we compared this toothpaste (‘Test’) with a stannous fluoride-zinc citrate (SnF(2)-Zn) toothpaste (‘Reference’) (both 1100–1150 ppm fluoride) and a fluoride-free toothpaste (‘Placebo’) using an enamel dental erosion-rehardening model. METHODS: In each phase of this randomised, investigator-blind, crossover study, participants wore palatal appliances holding bovine enamel specimens with erosive lesions. They brushed their natural teeth with either the Test, Reference or Placebo toothpastes, then swished the resultant slurry. Specimens were removed at 2 h and 4 h post-brushing and exposed to an in vitro acid challenge. Surface microhardness was measured at each stage; enamel fluoride uptake was measured after in situ rehardening. Surface microhardness recovery, relative erosion resistance, enamel fluoride uptake and acid resistance ratio were calculated at both timepoints. RESULTS: Sixty two randomised participants completed the study. Test toothpaste treatment yielded significantly greater surface microhardness recovery, relative erosion resistance and enamel fluoride uptake values than either Reference or Placebo toothpastes after 2 and 4 h. The acid resistance ratio value for Test toothpaste was significantly greater than either of the other treatments after 2 h; after 4 h, it was significantly greater versus Placebo only. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this in situ model, the novel-formulation sodium fluoride toothpaste enhanced enamel rehardening and overall protection against demineralisation compared with a fluoride-free toothpaste and a marketed SnF(2)-Zn toothpaste. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03296072; registered September 28, 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71642892020-04-22 In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial Creeth, Jonathan E. Burnett, Gary R. Souverain, Audrey Gomez-Pereira, Paola Zero, Domenick T. Lippert, Frank Hara, Anderson T. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: A novel sodium fluoride toothpaste containing lactate ion and polyvinylmethylether-maleic anhydride has been developed to promote enamel remineralisation and resistance to demineralisation. In this in situ study, we compared this toothpaste (‘Test’) with a stannous fluoride-zinc citrate (SnF(2)-Zn) toothpaste (‘Reference’) (both 1100–1150 ppm fluoride) and a fluoride-free toothpaste (‘Placebo’) using an enamel dental erosion-rehardening model. METHODS: In each phase of this randomised, investigator-blind, crossover study, participants wore palatal appliances holding bovine enamel specimens with erosive lesions. They brushed their natural teeth with either the Test, Reference or Placebo toothpastes, then swished the resultant slurry. Specimens were removed at 2 h and 4 h post-brushing and exposed to an in vitro acid challenge. Surface microhardness was measured at each stage; enamel fluoride uptake was measured after in situ rehardening. Surface microhardness recovery, relative erosion resistance, enamel fluoride uptake and acid resistance ratio were calculated at both timepoints. RESULTS: Sixty two randomised participants completed the study. Test toothpaste treatment yielded significantly greater surface microhardness recovery, relative erosion resistance and enamel fluoride uptake values than either Reference or Placebo toothpastes after 2 and 4 h. The acid resistance ratio value for Test toothpaste was significantly greater than either of the other treatments after 2 h; after 4 h, it was significantly greater versus Placebo only. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this in situ model, the novel-formulation sodium fluoride toothpaste enhanced enamel rehardening and overall protection against demineralisation compared with a fluoride-free toothpaste and a marketed SnF(2)-Zn toothpaste. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03296072; registered September 28, 2017. BioMed Central 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7164289/ /pubmed/32303206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01081-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Creeth, Jonathan E.
Burnett, Gary R.
Souverain, Audrey
Gomez-Pereira, Paola
Zero, Domenick T.
Lippert, Frank
Hara, Anderson T.
In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial
title In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial
title_full In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial
title_fullStr In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial
title_short In situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial
title_sort in situ efficacy of an experimental toothpaste on enamel rehardening and prevention of demineralisation: a randomised, controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01081-y
work_keys_str_mv AT creethjonathane insituefficacyofanexperimentaltoothpasteonenamelrehardeningandpreventionofdemineralisationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burnettgaryr insituefficacyofanexperimentaltoothpasteonenamelrehardeningandpreventionofdemineralisationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT souverainaudrey insituefficacyofanexperimentaltoothpasteonenamelrehardeningandpreventionofdemineralisationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gomezpereirapaola insituefficacyofanexperimentaltoothpasteonenamelrehardeningandpreventionofdemineralisationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zerodomenickt insituefficacyofanexperimentaltoothpasteonenamelrehardeningandpreventionofdemineralisationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lippertfrank insituefficacyofanexperimentaltoothpasteonenamelrehardeningandpreventionofdemineralisationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haraandersont insituefficacyofanexperimentaltoothpasteonenamelrehardeningandpreventionofdemineralisationarandomisedcontrolledtrial