Cargando…

3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance

BACKGROUND: A functional appliance is commonly used to optimize the development of the facial skeleton in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Recent three-dimensional(3D) image-based analysis offers numerous advantages in quantitative measurement and visualization in orthodontics. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Yi, Schneider, Paul, Matthews, Harold, Roberts, Wilbur Eugene, Xu, Tianmin, Wei, Robert, Claes, Peter, Clement, John, Kilpatrick, Nicky, Penington, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01108-4
_version_ 1783523267491921920
author Fan, Yi
Schneider, Paul
Matthews, Harold
Roberts, Wilbur Eugene
Xu, Tianmin
Wei, Robert
Claes, Peter
Clement, John
Kilpatrick, Nicky
Penington, Anthony
author_facet Fan, Yi
Schneider, Paul
Matthews, Harold
Roberts, Wilbur Eugene
Xu, Tianmin
Wei, Robert
Claes, Peter
Clement, John
Kilpatrick, Nicky
Penington, Anthony
author_sort Fan, Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A functional appliance is commonly used to optimize the development of the facial skeleton in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Recent three-dimensional(3D) image-based analysis offers numerous advantages in quantitative measurement and visualization in orthodontics. The aim of this study was to localize in 3D the skeletal effect produced by the Herbst appliance on the mandible using the geometric morphometric technique. METHODS: Twenty patients treated with a Herbst appliance and subsequent fixed appliances were included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken before treatment (T1), 8 weeks after Herbst appliance removal (T2), and after subsequent fixed appliance treatment (T3). Spatially dense morphometric techniques were used to establish the corresponding points of the mandible. The mandibular morphological changes from T1-T2, T2-T3, and T1-T3 were calculated for each patient by superimposing two mandibular models at two time points with robust Procrustes superimposition. These changes were then compared to the morphological changes estimated from normative mandibular growth curves over the same period. The proportion of cases exceeding the growth expression for controls was compared to a normal population using a one tailed binomial test. RESULTS: Approximately 1.5–2 mm greater condylar changes and 0.5 mm greater changes in the chin occurred from Tl to T2. This effect lasted until the completion of treatment (T1-T3), but there was no obvious skeletal effect during the orthodontic phase (T2-T3). Approximately 40–50% of the patient sample exceeded condylar growth by > 1.5 mm compared to untreated controls (p < .05). However, changes at the chin were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The principal skeletal effect of Herbst appliance treatment was additional increase in condylar length for about half of the sample. This inconsistency may relate to the degree of mandibular growth suppression associated with a specific malocclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71642942020-04-22 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance Fan, Yi Schneider, Paul Matthews, Harold Roberts, Wilbur Eugene Xu, Tianmin Wei, Robert Claes, Peter Clement, John Kilpatrick, Nicky Penington, Anthony BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: A functional appliance is commonly used to optimize the development of the facial skeleton in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Recent three-dimensional(3D) image-based analysis offers numerous advantages in quantitative measurement and visualization in orthodontics. The aim of this study was to localize in 3D the skeletal effect produced by the Herbst appliance on the mandible using the geometric morphometric technique. METHODS: Twenty patients treated with a Herbst appliance and subsequent fixed appliances were included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken before treatment (T1), 8 weeks after Herbst appliance removal (T2), and after subsequent fixed appliance treatment (T3). Spatially dense morphometric techniques were used to establish the corresponding points of the mandible. The mandibular morphological changes from T1-T2, T2-T3, and T1-T3 were calculated for each patient by superimposing two mandibular models at two time points with robust Procrustes superimposition. These changes were then compared to the morphological changes estimated from normative mandibular growth curves over the same period. The proportion of cases exceeding the growth expression for controls was compared to a normal population using a one tailed binomial test. RESULTS: Approximately 1.5–2 mm greater condylar changes and 0.5 mm greater changes in the chin occurred from Tl to T2. This effect lasted until the completion of treatment (T1-T3), but there was no obvious skeletal effect during the orthodontic phase (T2-T3). Approximately 40–50% of the patient sample exceeded condylar growth by > 1.5 mm compared to untreated controls (p < .05). However, changes at the chin were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The principal skeletal effect of Herbst appliance treatment was additional increase in condylar length for about half of the sample. This inconsistency may relate to the degree of mandibular growth suppression associated with a specific malocclusion. BioMed Central 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7164294/ /pubmed/32299402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01108-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fan, Yi
Schneider, Paul
Matthews, Harold
Roberts, Wilbur Eugene
Xu, Tianmin
Wei, Robert
Claes, Peter
Clement, John
Kilpatrick, Nicky
Penington, Anthony
3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance
title 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance
title_full 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance
title_fullStr 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance
title_full_unstemmed 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance
title_short 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance
title_sort 3d assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the herbst appliance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01108-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fanyi 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT schneiderpaul 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT matthewsharold 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT robertswilbureugene 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT xutianmin 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT weirobert 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT claespeter 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT clementjohn 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT kilpatricknicky 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance
AT peningtonanthony 3dassessmentofmandibularskeletaleffectsproducedbytheherbstappliance