Cargando…

Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures. Some surgeons still perform routine post-sleeve gastrografin (RSG) study believing that it would detect post-LSG complications, especially leak. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost-e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assakran, Bandar Saad, Alromaih, Abdullah Homood, Alashkar, Abdulrahman Haitham, AlGhasham, Fatimah Salem, Alqunai, Mansur Suliman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05060-y
_version_ 1783523273135357952
author Assakran, Bandar Saad
Alromaih, Abdullah Homood
Alashkar, Abdulrahman Haitham
AlGhasham, Fatimah Salem
Alqunai, Mansur Suliman
author_facet Assakran, Bandar Saad
Alromaih, Abdullah Homood
Alashkar, Abdulrahman Haitham
AlGhasham, Fatimah Salem
Alqunai, Mansur Suliman
author_sort Assakran, Bandar Saad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures. Some surgeons still perform routine post-sleeve gastrografin (RSG) study believing that it would detect post-LSG complications, especially leak. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RSG by considering the cost of the study, length of hospital stay and complications-related costs RSG could prevent. RESULTS: A total of 98 eligible patients were included. Of them, 54 patients underwent RSG and 44 did not. Excluding the cost of LSG procedure, the average cost for those who underwent RSG and those who did not in Saudi Riyal (£) was 5193.15 (1054.77) and 4222.27 (857.58), respectively. The average length of stay (ALOS) was practically the same regardless of whether or not the patient underwent RSG. 90.8% (n = 89) of all patients stayed for 3 days. None of the patients developed postoperative bleeding, stenosis or leak. The mean weight, body mass index (BMI) and percentage weight loss (PWL) 6 months postoperatively were found to be 87.71 kg (SD = 17.51), 33.89 kg/m(2) (SD = 7.29) and 26.41% (SD = 9.79), respectively. The PWL 6 months postoperatively was 23.99% (SD = 8.47) for females and 30.57 (SD = 10.6) for males (p = 0.01).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71643382020-04-22 Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases Assakran, Bandar Saad Alromaih, Abdullah Homood Alashkar, Abdulrahman Haitham AlGhasham, Fatimah Salem Alqunai, Mansur Suliman BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures. Some surgeons still perform routine post-sleeve gastrografin (RSG) study believing that it would detect post-LSG complications, especially leak. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RSG by considering the cost of the study, length of hospital stay and complications-related costs RSG could prevent. RESULTS: A total of 98 eligible patients were included. Of them, 54 patients underwent RSG and 44 did not. Excluding the cost of LSG procedure, the average cost for those who underwent RSG and those who did not in Saudi Riyal (£) was 5193.15 (1054.77) and 4222.27 (857.58), respectively. The average length of stay (ALOS) was practically the same regardless of whether or not the patient underwent RSG. 90.8% (n = 89) of all patients stayed for 3 days. None of the patients developed postoperative bleeding, stenosis or leak. The mean weight, body mass index (BMI) and percentage weight loss (PWL) 6 months postoperatively were found to be 87.71 kg (SD = 17.51), 33.89 kg/m(2) (SD = 7.29) and 26.41% (SD = 9.79), respectively. The PWL 6 months postoperatively was 23.99% (SD = 8.47) for females and 30.57 (SD = 10.6) for males (p = 0.01). BioMed Central 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7164338/ /pubmed/32299510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05060-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Assakran, Bandar Saad
Alromaih, Abdullah Homood
Alashkar, Abdulrahman Haitham
AlGhasham, Fatimah Salem
Alqunai, Mansur Suliman
Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases
title Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases
title_full Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases
title_fullStr Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases
title_full_unstemmed Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases
title_short Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases
title_sort is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? profile of 98 cases
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05060-y
work_keys_str_mv AT assakranbandarsaad isroutinepostsleevegastrografinneededprofileof98cases
AT alromaihabdullahhomood isroutinepostsleevegastrografinneededprofileof98cases
AT alashkarabdulrahmanhaitham isroutinepostsleevegastrografinneededprofileof98cases
AT alghashamfatimahsalem isroutinepostsleevegastrografinneededprofileof98cases
AT alqunaimansursuliman isroutinepostsleevegastrografinneededprofileof98cases