Cargando…
The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings
OBJECTIVE: Perceived cognitive dysfunction in people with fibromyalgia (FM), “fibrofog,” is commonly reported and has been demonstrated in neurocognitive testing. Distractibility and inattention have been implicated as potential contributors to fibrofog, but the role of environmental distractions ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32237225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11130 |
_version_ | 1783523325816864768 |
---|---|
author | Kratz, Anna L. Whibley, Daniel Kim, Samsuk Williams, David A. Clauw, Daniel J. Sliwinski, Martin |
author_facet | Kratz, Anna L. Whibley, Daniel Kim, Samsuk Williams, David A. Clauw, Daniel J. Sliwinski, Martin |
author_sort | Kratz, Anna L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Perceived cognitive dysfunction in people with fibromyalgia (FM), “fibrofog,” is commonly reported and has been demonstrated in neurocognitive testing. Distractibility and inattention have been implicated as potential contributors to fibrofog, but the role of environmental distractions has not been explored. In this study, ambulatory assessment methods were used to examine whether FM is related to more environmental distractions and to examine the impact of distractions on subjective and objective cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fifty people with FM and 50 age‐, sex‐, and education‐matched controls without FM completed 8 consecutive days of ambulatory assessments. Five times per day, participants reported perceived cognitive functioning and environmental distractions and completed validated tests of processing speed and working memory. RESULTS: The FM group reported distractions in a higher proportion of the ambulatory cognitive testing sessions (40.5%) compared with the group without FM (29.8%; P < 0.001) and more often reported multiple simultaneous distractions. For both groups, sound was the most common distraction. The group with FM reported more distractions caused by light, and the group without FM reported more social distractions. Group differences in subjective and objective cognitive functioning were not augmented during distraction relative to during periods of no distraction. There were no group differences in within‐person changes in cognitive functioning as a function of distraction. CONCLUSION: The group with FM reported more distractions than the group without FM; both groups reported poorer processing speed when distracted, and the effects of distraction on test performance did not differ significantly by group. Findings suggest that sensitivity to environmental distractions may play a role in the experience of cognitive dysfunction in FM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7164629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71646292020-04-20 The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings Kratz, Anna L. Whibley, Daniel Kim, Samsuk Williams, David A. Clauw, Daniel J. Sliwinski, Martin ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Perceived cognitive dysfunction in people with fibromyalgia (FM), “fibrofog,” is commonly reported and has been demonstrated in neurocognitive testing. Distractibility and inattention have been implicated as potential contributors to fibrofog, but the role of environmental distractions has not been explored. In this study, ambulatory assessment methods were used to examine whether FM is related to more environmental distractions and to examine the impact of distractions on subjective and objective cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fifty people with FM and 50 age‐, sex‐, and education‐matched controls without FM completed 8 consecutive days of ambulatory assessments. Five times per day, participants reported perceived cognitive functioning and environmental distractions and completed validated tests of processing speed and working memory. RESULTS: The FM group reported distractions in a higher proportion of the ambulatory cognitive testing sessions (40.5%) compared with the group without FM (29.8%; P < 0.001) and more often reported multiple simultaneous distractions. For both groups, sound was the most common distraction. The group with FM reported more distractions caused by light, and the group without FM reported more social distractions. Group differences in subjective and objective cognitive functioning were not augmented during distraction relative to during periods of no distraction. There were no group differences in within‐person changes in cognitive functioning as a function of distraction. CONCLUSION: The group with FM reported more distractions than the group without FM; both groups reported poorer processing speed when distracted, and the effects of distraction on test performance did not differ significantly by group. Findings suggest that sensitivity to environmental distractions may play a role in the experience of cognitive dysfunction in FM. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7164629/ /pubmed/32237225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11130 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kratz, Anna L. Whibley, Daniel Kim, Samsuk Williams, David A. Clauw, Daniel J. Sliwinski, Martin The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings |
title | The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings |
title_full | The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings |
title_fullStr | The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings |
title_short | The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings |
title_sort | role of environmental distractions in the experience of fibrofog in real‐world settings |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32237225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kratzannal theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT whibleydaniel theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT kimsamsuk theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT williamsdavida theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT clauwdanielj theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT sliwinskimartin theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT kratzannal roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT whibleydaniel roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT kimsamsuk roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT williamsdavida roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT clauwdanielj roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings AT sliwinskimartin roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings |