Cargando…

The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings

OBJECTIVE: Perceived cognitive dysfunction in people with fibromyalgia (FM), “fibrofog,” is commonly reported and has been demonstrated in neurocognitive testing. Distractibility and inattention have been implicated as potential contributors to fibrofog, but the role of environmental distractions ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kratz, Anna L., Whibley, Daniel, Kim, Samsuk, Williams, David A., Clauw, Daniel J., Sliwinski, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32237225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11130
_version_ 1783523325816864768
author Kratz, Anna L.
Whibley, Daniel
Kim, Samsuk
Williams, David A.
Clauw, Daniel J.
Sliwinski, Martin
author_facet Kratz, Anna L.
Whibley, Daniel
Kim, Samsuk
Williams, David A.
Clauw, Daniel J.
Sliwinski, Martin
author_sort Kratz, Anna L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Perceived cognitive dysfunction in people with fibromyalgia (FM), “fibrofog,” is commonly reported and has been demonstrated in neurocognitive testing. Distractibility and inattention have been implicated as potential contributors to fibrofog, but the role of environmental distractions has not been explored. In this study, ambulatory assessment methods were used to examine whether FM is related to more environmental distractions and to examine the impact of distractions on subjective and objective cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fifty people with FM and 50 age‐, sex‐, and education‐matched controls without FM completed 8 consecutive days of ambulatory assessments. Five times per day, participants reported perceived cognitive functioning and environmental distractions and completed validated tests of processing speed and working memory. RESULTS: The FM group reported distractions in a higher proportion of the ambulatory cognitive testing sessions (40.5%) compared with the group without FM (29.8%; P < 0.001) and more often reported multiple simultaneous distractions. For both groups, sound was the most common distraction. The group with FM reported more distractions caused by light, and the group without FM reported more social distractions. Group differences in subjective and objective cognitive functioning were not augmented during distraction relative to during periods of no distraction. There were no group differences in within‐person changes in cognitive functioning as a function of distraction. CONCLUSION: The group with FM reported more distractions than the group without FM; both groups reported poorer processing speed when distracted, and the effects of distraction on test performance did not differ significantly by group. Findings suggest that sensitivity to environmental distractions may play a role in the experience of cognitive dysfunction in FM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71646292020-04-20 The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings Kratz, Anna L. Whibley, Daniel Kim, Samsuk Williams, David A. Clauw, Daniel J. Sliwinski, Martin ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Perceived cognitive dysfunction in people with fibromyalgia (FM), “fibrofog,” is commonly reported and has been demonstrated in neurocognitive testing. Distractibility and inattention have been implicated as potential contributors to fibrofog, but the role of environmental distractions has not been explored. In this study, ambulatory assessment methods were used to examine whether FM is related to more environmental distractions and to examine the impact of distractions on subjective and objective cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fifty people with FM and 50 age‐, sex‐, and education‐matched controls without FM completed 8 consecutive days of ambulatory assessments. Five times per day, participants reported perceived cognitive functioning and environmental distractions and completed validated tests of processing speed and working memory. RESULTS: The FM group reported distractions in a higher proportion of the ambulatory cognitive testing sessions (40.5%) compared with the group without FM (29.8%; P < 0.001) and more often reported multiple simultaneous distractions. For both groups, sound was the most common distraction. The group with FM reported more distractions caused by light, and the group without FM reported more social distractions. Group differences in subjective and objective cognitive functioning were not augmented during distraction relative to during periods of no distraction. There were no group differences in within‐person changes in cognitive functioning as a function of distraction. CONCLUSION: The group with FM reported more distractions than the group without FM; both groups reported poorer processing speed when distracted, and the effects of distraction on test performance did not differ significantly by group. Findings suggest that sensitivity to environmental distractions may play a role in the experience of cognitive dysfunction in FM. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7164629/ /pubmed/32237225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11130 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kratz, Anna L.
Whibley, Daniel
Kim, Samsuk
Williams, David A.
Clauw, Daniel J.
Sliwinski, Martin
The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings
title The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings
title_full The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings
title_fullStr The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings
title_short The Role of Environmental Distractions in the Experience of Fibrofog in Real‐World Settings
title_sort role of environmental distractions in the experience of fibrofog in real‐world settings
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32237225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11130
work_keys_str_mv AT kratzannal theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT whibleydaniel theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT kimsamsuk theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT williamsdavida theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT clauwdanielj theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT sliwinskimartin theroleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT kratzannal roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT whibleydaniel roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT kimsamsuk roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT williamsdavida roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT clauwdanielj roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings
AT sliwinskimartin roleofenvironmentaldistractionsintheexperienceoffibrofoginrealworldsettings