Cargando…
Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed?
Background The insertion and subsequent removal of chest tubes are frequently performed procedures for the management of pneumothoraces, pleural effusions, and cardio-thoracic surgical interventions. A chest radiograph is commonly obtained after the removal of a chest tube to rule out the interval d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313780 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7339 |
_version_ | 1783523337399435264 |
---|---|
author | Diaz, Raiko Patel, Krunal B Almeida, Patricia Shekar, Saketh P Hernandez, Felix Mehta, Jinesh PpP |
author_facet | Diaz, Raiko Patel, Krunal B Almeida, Patricia Shekar, Saketh P Hernandez, Felix Mehta, Jinesh PpP |
author_sort | Diaz, Raiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The insertion and subsequent removal of chest tubes are frequently performed procedures for the management of pneumothoraces, pleural effusions, and cardio-thoracic surgical interventions. A chest radiograph is commonly obtained after the removal of a chest tube to rule out the interval development of a pneumothorax. This practice has been questioned in various retrospective and prospective studies conducted on surgical patient populations, showing little to no benefits in performing routine chest X-rays (CXRs) after chest tube removal unless clinical symptoms such as worsening respiratory status and hemodynamic compromise are present. Material and Methods A four-year retrospective study was conducted using the Cleveland Clinic Foundation database. A chart review was performed, and 1,032 patients were screened, with 200 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria included patients who underwent chest tube insertion for non-surgical reasons. The primary outcome was the percentage of clinically significant pneumothoraces detected by routine CXR after chest tube removal. Results Out of the 200 patients included in the study, 53 had a CXR after chest tube removal showing a residual pneumothorax. Out of the 53 patients, 50 ended up not needing chest tube re-insertion, as the patients were asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable. Only three patients required chest tube re-insertion due to respiratory symptoms and significant hemodynamic changes after the chest tubes were removed. In all three cases, the symptoms manifested prior to the CXRs being obtained; therefore, the decision to reinsert each chest tubes was made based on clinical signs rather than imaging. As expected, the practice of repeating CXRs after removal of the chest tubes resulted in delayed discharges despite patients reporting no symptoms and being hemodynamically stable. Conclusions Our study findings correlate with prior smaller studies on surgical patients. Symptoms and hemodynamic data seem to be a better predictor of whether a patient will require chest tube re-insertion or not. Routine CXR after chest tube removal also leads to prolonged hospital stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7164698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71646982020-04-20 Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? Diaz, Raiko Patel, Krunal B Almeida, Patricia Shekar, Saketh P Hernandez, Felix Mehta, Jinesh PpP Cureus Internal Medicine Background The insertion and subsequent removal of chest tubes are frequently performed procedures for the management of pneumothoraces, pleural effusions, and cardio-thoracic surgical interventions. A chest radiograph is commonly obtained after the removal of a chest tube to rule out the interval development of a pneumothorax. This practice has been questioned in various retrospective and prospective studies conducted on surgical patient populations, showing little to no benefits in performing routine chest X-rays (CXRs) after chest tube removal unless clinical symptoms such as worsening respiratory status and hemodynamic compromise are present. Material and Methods A four-year retrospective study was conducted using the Cleveland Clinic Foundation database. A chart review was performed, and 1,032 patients were screened, with 200 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria included patients who underwent chest tube insertion for non-surgical reasons. The primary outcome was the percentage of clinically significant pneumothoraces detected by routine CXR after chest tube removal. Results Out of the 200 patients included in the study, 53 had a CXR after chest tube removal showing a residual pneumothorax. Out of the 53 patients, 50 ended up not needing chest tube re-insertion, as the patients were asymptomatic and hemodynamically stable. Only three patients required chest tube re-insertion due to respiratory symptoms and significant hemodynamic changes after the chest tubes were removed. In all three cases, the symptoms manifested prior to the CXRs being obtained; therefore, the decision to reinsert each chest tubes was made based on clinical signs rather than imaging. As expected, the practice of repeating CXRs after removal of the chest tubes resulted in delayed discharges despite patients reporting no symptoms and being hemodynamically stable. Conclusions Our study findings correlate with prior smaller studies on surgical patients. Symptoms and hemodynamic data seem to be a better predictor of whether a patient will require chest tube re-insertion or not. Routine CXR after chest tube removal also leads to prolonged hospital stay. Cureus 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7164698/ /pubmed/32313780 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7339 Text en Copyright © 2020, Diaz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Internal Medicine Diaz, Raiko Patel, Krunal B Almeida, Patricia Shekar, Saketh P Hernandez, Felix Mehta, Jinesh PpP Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? |
title | Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? |
title_full | Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? |
title_fullStr | Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? |
title_short | Are Chest Radiographs Routinely Indicated After Chest Tubes Placed for Non-Surgical Reasons Are Removed? |
title_sort | are chest radiographs routinely indicated after chest tubes placed for non-surgical reasons are removed? |
topic | Internal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313780 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diazraiko arechestradiographsroutinelyindicatedafterchesttubesplacedfornonsurgicalreasonsareremoved AT patelkrunalb arechestradiographsroutinelyindicatedafterchesttubesplacedfornonsurgicalreasonsareremoved AT almeidapatricia arechestradiographsroutinelyindicatedafterchesttubesplacedfornonsurgicalreasonsareremoved AT shekarsakethp arechestradiographsroutinelyindicatedafterchesttubesplacedfornonsurgicalreasonsareremoved AT hernandezfelix arechestradiographsroutinelyindicatedafterchesttubesplacedfornonsurgicalreasonsareremoved AT mehtajineshppp arechestradiographsroutinelyindicatedafterchesttubesplacedfornonsurgicalreasonsareremoved |