Cargando…

Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study

Introduction Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major burden on the health care system. The timing of endoscopy has been an ongoing debate and data on the association of early endoscopy with a better or worse clinical outcome are conflicting. In our study, we aimed to identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saleem, Sheikh A, Kudaravalli, Pujitha, Riaz, Sana, Pendela, Venkata Satish, Wang, Dongliang, Lowe, Dhruv, Manocha, Divey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313766
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7325
_version_ 1783523341851688960
author Saleem, Sheikh A
Kudaravalli, Pujitha
Riaz, Sana
Pendela, Venkata Satish
Wang, Dongliang
Lowe, Dhruv
Manocha, Divey
author_facet Saleem, Sheikh A
Kudaravalli, Pujitha
Riaz, Sana
Pendela, Venkata Satish
Wang, Dongliang
Lowe, Dhruv
Manocha, Divey
author_sort Saleem, Sheikh A
collection PubMed
description Introduction Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major burden on the health care system. The timing of endoscopy has been an ongoing debate and data on the association of early endoscopy with a better or worse clinical outcome are conflicting. In our study, we aimed to identify the benefits versus the risks of performing an urgent endoscopy in regards to the number of endoscopic interventions, length of hospital stay, number of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, and mortality.  Methodology This is a retrospective record-based study. A total of 806 charts were reviewed and 251 patients with the signs and symptoms of UGIB on presentation were included in the study. Patients with variceal bleeding, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, insignificant bleeds with no drop in H/H, GI bleed not being the presenting complaint on admission, and patients on anticoagulation were excluded. Results Out of the patients who underwent an urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), 26.2% needed a second-look EGD 48 hours after the first EGD when compared to 4% and 2% in the early (12-24 hours) and late (>24 hours) endoscopy groups, respectively. In patients who underwent urgent EGD, 23% had active bleeding and it was statistically significant when compared to the other groups. The active bleeding limited the visualization during the endoscopy, which led to a repeat EGD in the urgent EGD group. If an endoscopic intervention was received, patients having EGD >24 hours received a smaller number of interventions. There was no statistical difference in the Blatchford scores between the three groups, indicating that the groups were similar in morbidity. No difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, or number of blood transfusions received, surgical or interventional radiology-guided interventions was found between the three groups. Conclusion Patients who underwent urgent endoscopy had more procedures, with no difference in mortality, number of units of blood transfused, or length of hospitalization when compared to the early or late endoscopy groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71647182020-04-20 Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study Saleem, Sheikh A Kudaravalli, Pujitha Riaz, Sana Pendela, Venkata Satish Wang, Dongliang Lowe, Dhruv Manocha, Divey Cureus Gastroenterology Introduction Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major burden on the health care system. The timing of endoscopy has been an ongoing debate and data on the association of early endoscopy with a better or worse clinical outcome are conflicting. In our study, we aimed to identify the benefits versus the risks of performing an urgent endoscopy in regards to the number of endoscopic interventions, length of hospital stay, number of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, and mortality.  Methodology This is a retrospective record-based study. A total of 806 charts were reviewed and 251 patients with the signs and symptoms of UGIB on presentation were included in the study. Patients with variceal bleeding, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, insignificant bleeds with no drop in H/H, GI bleed not being the presenting complaint on admission, and patients on anticoagulation were excluded. Results Out of the patients who underwent an urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), 26.2% needed a second-look EGD 48 hours after the first EGD when compared to 4% and 2% in the early (12-24 hours) and late (>24 hours) endoscopy groups, respectively. In patients who underwent urgent EGD, 23% had active bleeding and it was statistically significant when compared to the other groups. The active bleeding limited the visualization during the endoscopy, which led to a repeat EGD in the urgent EGD group. If an endoscopic intervention was received, patients having EGD >24 hours received a smaller number of interventions. There was no statistical difference in the Blatchford scores between the three groups, indicating that the groups were similar in morbidity. No difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, or number of blood transfusions received, surgical or interventional radiology-guided interventions was found between the three groups. Conclusion Patients who underwent urgent endoscopy had more procedures, with no difference in mortality, number of units of blood transfused, or length of hospitalization when compared to the early or late endoscopy groups. Cureus 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7164718/ /pubmed/32313766 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7325 Text en Copyright © 2020, Saleem et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology
Saleem, Sheikh A
Kudaravalli, Pujitha
Riaz, Sana
Pendela, Venkata Satish
Wang, Dongliang
Lowe, Dhruv
Manocha, Divey
Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
title Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
title_full Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
title_short Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
title_sort outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding based on time to endoscopy: a retrospective study
topic Gastroenterology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313766
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7325
work_keys_str_mv AT saleemsheikha outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy
AT kudaravallipujitha outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy
AT riazsana outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy
AT pendelavenkatasatish outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy
AT wangdongliang outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy
AT lowedhruv outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy
AT manochadivey outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy