Cargando…
Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study
Introduction Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major burden on the health care system. The timing of endoscopy has been an ongoing debate and data on the association of early endoscopy with a better or worse clinical outcome are conflicting. In our study, we aimed to identify...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313766 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7325 |
_version_ | 1783523341851688960 |
---|---|
author | Saleem, Sheikh A Kudaravalli, Pujitha Riaz, Sana Pendela, Venkata Satish Wang, Dongliang Lowe, Dhruv Manocha, Divey |
author_facet | Saleem, Sheikh A Kudaravalli, Pujitha Riaz, Sana Pendela, Venkata Satish Wang, Dongliang Lowe, Dhruv Manocha, Divey |
author_sort | Saleem, Sheikh A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major burden on the health care system. The timing of endoscopy has been an ongoing debate and data on the association of early endoscopy with a better or worse clinical outcome are conflicting. In our study, we aimed to identify the benefits versus the risks of performing an urgent endoscopy in regards to the number of endoscopic interventions, length of hospital stay, number of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, and mortality. Methodology This is a retrospective record-based study. A total of 806 charts were reviewed and 251 patients with the signs and symptoms of UGIB on presentation were included in the study. Patients with variceal bleeding, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, insignificant bleeds with no drop in H/H, GI bleed not being the presenting complaint on admission, and patients on anticoagulation were excluded. Results Out of the patients who underwent an urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), 26.2% needed a second-look EGD 48 hours after the first EGD when compared to 4% and 2% in the early (12-24 hours) and late (>24 hours) endoscopy groups, respectively. In patients who underwent urgent EGD, 23% had active bleeding and it was statistically significant when compared to the other groups. The active bleeding limited the visualization during the endoscopy, which led to a repeat EGD in the urgent EGD group. If an endoscopic intervention was received, patients having EGD >24 hours received a smaller number of interventions. There was no statistical difference in the Blatchford scores between the three groups, indicating that the groups were similar in morbidity. No difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, or number of blood transfusions received, surgical or interventional radiology-guided interventions was found between the three groups. Conclusion Patients who underwent urgent endoscopy had more procedures, with no difference in mortality, number of units of blood transfused, or length of hospitalization when compared to the early or late endoscopy groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7164718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71647182020-04-20 Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study Saleem, Sheikh A Kudaravalli, Pujitha Riaz, Sana Pendela, Venkata Satish Wang, Dongliang Lowe, Dhruv Manocha, Divey Cureus Gastroenterology Introduction Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major burden on the health care system. The timing of endoscopy has been an ongoing debate and data on the association of early endoscopy with a better or worse clinical outcome are conflicting. In our study, we aimed to identify the benefits versus the risks of performing an urgent endoscopy in regards to the number of endoscopic interventions, length of hospital stay, number of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, and mortality. Methodology This is a retrospective record-based study. A total of 806 charts were reviewed and 251 patients with the signs and symptoms of UGIB on presentation were included in the study. Patients with variceal bleeding, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, insignificant bleeds with no drop in H/H, GI bleed not being the presenting complaint on admission, and patients on anticoagulation were excluded. Results Out of the patients who underwent an urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), 26.2% needed a second-look EGD 48 hours after the first EGD when compared to 4% and 2% in the early (12-24 hours) and late (>24 hours) endoscopy groups, respectively. In patients who underwent urgent EGD, 23% had active bleeding and it was statistically significant when compared to the other groups. The active bleeding limited the visualization during the endoscopy, which led to a repeat EGD in the urgent EGD group. If an endoscopic intervention was received, patients having EGD >24 hours received a smaller number of interventions. There was no statistical difference in the Blatchford scores between the three groups, indicating that the groups were similar in morbidity. No difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, or number of blood transfusions received, surgical or interventional radiology-guided interventions was found between the three groups. Conclusion Patients who underwent urgent endoscopy had more procedures, with no difference in mortality, number of units of blood transfused, or length of hospitalization when compared to the early or late endoscopy groups. Cureus 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7164718/ /pubmed/32313766 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7325 Text en Copyright © 2020, Saleem et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology Saleem, Sheikh A Kudaravalli, Pujitha Riaz, Sana Pendela, Venkata Satish Wang, Dongliang Lowe, Dhruv Manocha, Divey Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study |
title | Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding based on time to endoscopy: a retrospective study |
topic | Gastroenterology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32313766 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saleemsheikha outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy AT kudaravallipujitha outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy AT riazsana outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy AT pendelavenkatasatish outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy AT wangdongliang outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy AT lowedhruv outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy AT manochadivey outcomesofuppergastrointestinalbleedingbasedontimetoendoscopyaretrospectivestudy |