Cargando…

Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations

OBJECTIVE: to construct and validate a tool for the evaluation of responders in tactical casualty care simulations. METHOD: three rubrics for the application of a tourniquet, an emergency bandage and haemostatic agents recommended by the Hartford Consensus were developed and validated. Validity and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Usero-Pérez, Maria Del Carmen, Jiménez-Rodríguez, Maria Lourdes, González-Aguña, Alexandra, González-Alonso, Valentín, Orbañanos-Peiro, Luis, Santamaría-García, Jose María, Gómez-González, Jorge Luís
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32321042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3052.3251
_version_ 1783523381398732800
author Usero-Pérez, Maria Del Carmen
Jiménez-Rodríguez, Maria Lourdes
González-Aguña, Alexandra
González-Alonso, Valentín
Orbañanos-Peiro, Luis
Santamaría-García, Jose María
Gómez-González, Jorge Luís
author_facet Usero-Pérez, Maria Del Carmen
Jiménez-Rodríguez, Maria Lourdes
González-Aguña, Alexandra
González-Alonso, Valentín
Orbañanos-Peiro, Luis
Santamaría-García, Jose María
Gómez-González, Jorge Luís
author_sort Usero-Pérez, Maria Del Carmen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to construct and validate a tool for the evaluation of responders in tactical casualty care simulations. METHOD: three rubrics for the application of a tourniquet, an emergency bandage and haemostatic agents recommended by the Hartford Consensus were developed and validated. Validity and reliability were studied. Validation was performed by 4 experts in the field and 36 nursing participants who were selected through convenience sampling. Three rubrics with 8 items were evaluated (except for the application of an emergency bandage, for which 7 items were evaluated). Each simulation was evaluated by 3 experts. RESULTS: an excellent score was obtained for the correlation index for the 3 simulations and 2 levels that were evaluated (competent and expert). The mean score for the application of a tourniquet was 0.897, the mean score for the application of an emergency bandage was 0.982, and the mean score for the application of topical haemostats was 0.805. CONCLUSION: this instrument for the evaluation of nurses in tactical casualty care simulations is considered useful, valid and reliable for training in a prehospital setting for both professionals who lack experience in tactical casualty care and those who are considered to be experts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7164920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71649202020-04-23 Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations Usero-Pérez, Maria Del Carmen Jiménez-Rodríguez, Maria Lourdes González-Aguña, Alexandra González-Alonso, Valentín Orbañanos-Peiro, Luis Santamaría-García, Jose María Gómez-González, Jorge Luís Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to construct and validate a tool for the evaluation of responders in tactical casualty care simulations. METHOD: three rubrics for the application of a tourniquet, an emergency bandage and haemostatic agents recommended by the Hartford Consensus were developed and validated. Validity and reliability were studied. Validation was performed by 4 experts in the field and 36 nursing participants who were selected through convenience sampling. Three rubrics with 8 items were evaluated (except for the application of an emergency bandage, for which 7 items were evaluated). Each simulation was evaluated by 3 experts. RESULTS: an excellent score was obtained for the correlation index for the 3 simulations and 2 levels that were evaluated (competent and expert). The mean score for the application of a tourniquet was 0.897, the mean score for the application of an emergency bandage was 0.982, and the mean score for the application of topical haemostats was 0.805. CONCLUSION: this instrument for the evaluation of nurses in tactical casualty care simulations is considered useful, valid and reliable for training in a prehospital setting for both professionals who lack experience in tactical casualty care and those who are considered to be experts. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7164920/ /pubmed/32321042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3052.3251 Text en Copyright © 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Usero-Pérez, Maria Del Carmen
Jiménez-Rodríguez, Maria Lourdes
González-Aguña, Alexandra
González-Alonso, Valentín
Orbañanos-Peiro, Luis
Santamaría-García, Jose María
Gómez-González, Jorge Luís
Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations
title Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations
title_full Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations
title_fullStr Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations
title_short Validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations
title_sort validation of an evaluation instrument for responders in tactical casualty care simulations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32321042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3052.3251
work_keys_str_mv AT useroperezmariadelcarmen validationofanevaluationinstrumentforrespondersintacticalcasualtycaresimulations
AT jimenezrodriguezmarialourdes validationofanevaluationinstrumentforrespondersintacticalcasualtycaresimulations
AT gonzalezagunaalexandra validationofanevaluationinstrumentforrespondersintacticalcasualtycaresimulations
AT gonzalezalonsovalentin validationofanevaluationinstrumentforrespondersintacticalcasualtycaresimulations
AT orbananospeiroluis validationofanevaluationinstrumentforrespondersintacticalcasualtycaresimulations
AT santamariagarciajosemaria validationofanevaluationinstrumentforrespondersintacticalcasualtycaresimulations
AT gomezgonzalezjorgeluis validationofanevaluationinstrumentforrespondersintacticalcasualtycaresimulations