Cargando…
When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study
BACKGROUND: There is guidance in the United Kingdom about what long-term care stroke survivors should receive, but a lack of guidance about who should deliver it and where this care should take place. This is a key issue given the evidence that current needs are not well addressed. The purpose of th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7165446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32305067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01139-4 |
_version_ | 1783523476649279488 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Lisa Mant, Jonathan Mullis, Ricky Roland, Martin |
author_facet | Lim, Lisa Mant, Jonathan Mullis, Ricky Roland, Martin |
author_sort | Lim, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is guidance in the United Kingdom about what long-term care stroke survivors should receive, but a lack of guidance about who should deliver it and where this care should take place. This is a key issue given the evidence that current needs are not well addressed. The purpose of this study was to explore when a referral from generalist to specialist services is appropriate in the long-term management of stroke survivors. METHODS: A modified RAND-Appropriateness method was used to gain consensus from a range of stroke specialist and generalist clinicians. Ten panelists rated fictional patient scenarios based on long-term post-stroke needs. Round 1 was an online survey in which panelists rated the scenarios for a) need for referral to specialist care and b) if referral was deemed necessary, need for this to be specifically to a stroke specialist. Round 2 was a face-to-face meeting in which panelists were presented with aggregate scores from round 1, and invited to discuss and then re-rate the scenarios. RESULTS: Seventeen scenarios comprising 69 referral decisions were discussed. Consensus on whether the patient needed to be referred to a specialist was achieved for 59 (86%) decisions. Of the 44 deemed needing referral to specialists, 18 were judged to need referral to a stroke-specialist and 14 to a different specialist. However, for 12 decisions there was no consensus about which specialist the patient should be referred to. For some scenarios (spasticity; incontinence; physical disability; communication; cognition), referral was deemed to be indicated regardless of severity, whereas indications for referral for topics such as risk factor management and pain depended on complexity and/or severity. CONCLUSIONS: There was broad agreement about when a stroke survivor requires referral to specialist care, but less agreement about destination of referral. Nevertheless, there was agreement that some of the longer-term issues facing stroke survivors are best addressed by stroke specialists, some by other specialists, and some by primary care. This has implications for models of longer-term stroke care, which need to reflect that optimal care requires access to, and better co-ordination between, both generalist and specialist healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7165446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71654462020-04-23 When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study Lim, Lisa Mant, Jonathan Mullis, Ricky Roland, Martin BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: There is guidance in the United Kingdom about what long-term care stroke survivors should receive, but a lack of guidance about who should deliver it and where this care should take place. This is a key issue given the evidence that current needs are not well addressed. The purpose of this study was to explore when a referral from generalist to specialist services is appropriate in the long-term management of stroke survivors. METHODS: A modified RAND-Appropriateness method was used to gain consensus from a range of stroke specialist and generalist clinicians. Ten panelists rated fictional patient scenarios based on long-term post-stroke needs. Round 1 was an online survey in which panelists rated the scenarios for a) need for referral to specialist care and b) if referral was deemed necessary, need for this to be specifically to a stroke specialist. Round 2 was a face-to-face meeting in which panelists were presented with aggregate scores from round 1, and invited to discuss and then re-rate the scenarios. RESULTS: Seventeen scenarios comprising 69 referral decisions were discussed. Consensus on whether the patient needed to be referred to a specialist was achieved for 59 (86%) decisions. Of the 44 deemed needing referral to specialists, 18 were judged to need referral to a stroke-specialist and 14 to a different specialist. However, for 12 decisions there was no consensus about which specialist the patient should be referred to. For some scenarios (spasticity; incontinence; physical disability; communication; cognition), referral was deemed to be indicated regardless of severity, whereas indications for referral for topics such as risk factor management and pain depended on complexity and/or severity. CONCLUSIONS: There was broad agreement about when a stroke survivor requires referral to specialist care, but less agreement about destination of referral. Nevertheless, there was agreement that some of the longer-term issues facing stroke survivors are best addressed by stroke specialists, some by other specialists, and some by primary care. This has implications for models of longer-term stroke care, which need to reflect that optimal care requires access to, and better co-ordination between, both generalist and specialist healthcare. BioMed Central 2020-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7165446/ /pubmed/32305067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01139-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lim, Lisa Mant, Jonathan Mullis, Ricky Roland, Martin When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study |
title | When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study |
title_full | When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study |
title_fullStr | When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study |
title_short | When is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? A modified RAND-appropriateness consensus study |
title_sort | when is referral from primary care to specialist services appropriate for survivors of stroke? a modified rand-appropriateness consensus study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7165446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32305067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01139-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limlisa whenisreferralfromprimarycaretospecialistservicesappropriateforsurvivorsofstrokeamodifiedrandappropriatenessconsensusstudy AT mantjonathan whenisreferralfromprimarycaretospecialistservicesappropriateforsurvivorsofstrokeamodifiedrandappropriatenessconsensusstudy AT mullisricky whenisreferralfromprimarycaretospecialistservicesappropriateforsurvivorsofstrokeamodifiedrandappropriatenessconsensusstudy AT rolandmartin whenisreferralfromprimarycaretospecialistservicesappropriateforsurvivorsofstrokeamodifiedrandappropriatenessconsensusstudy |