Cargando…

Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques

BACKGROUND: The HU linearity is an essential parameter in a quantitative imaging and the treatment planning systems of radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the linearity of Hounsfield unit (HU) in applying the adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) on CT scanner and its comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: I., Suyudi, C., Anam, H., Sutanto, P., Triadyaksa, T., Fujibuchi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337189
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1013
_version_ 1783523514331955200
author I., Suyudi
C., Anam
H., Sutanto
P., Triadyaksa
T., Fujibuchi
author_facet I., Suyudi
C., Anam
H., Sutanto
P., Triadyaksa
T., Fujibuchi
author_sort I., Suyudi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The HU linearity is an essential parameter in a quantitative imaging and the treatment planning systems of radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the linearity of Hounsfield unit (HU) in applying the adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) on CT scanner and its comparison to the filtered back-projection (FBP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this experimental phantom study, a TOS-phantom was scanned using a Toshiba Alexion 6 CT scanner. The images were reconstructed using the FBP and AIDR. Measurements of HU and noise values were performed on images of the “HU linearity” module of the TOS-phantom. The module had five embedded objects, i.e., air, polypropylene, nylon, acrylic, and Delrin. On each object, a circle area of 4.32 cm(2) was drawn and used to measure HU and noise values. The R(2) of the relation between mass densities vs. HU values was used to measure HU linearities at four different tube voltages. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare unpaired data and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The AIDR method produced a significant smaller image noise than the FBP method (p-value < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HU values of images reconstructed using FBP and AIDR methods (p-value > 0.05). The HU values acquired by the methods showed the same linearity marked by coinciding linear lines with the same R(2) value (> 0.999). CONCLUSION: AIDR methods produce the HU linearity as FBP methods with a smaller image noise level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7166214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71662142020-04-24 Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques I., Suyudi C., Anam H., Sutanto P., Triadyaksa T., Fujibuchi J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: The HU linearity is an essential parameter in a quantitative imaging and the treatment planning systems of radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the linearity of Hounsfield unit (HU) in applying the adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) on CT scanner and its comparison to the filtered back-projection (FBP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this experimental phantom study, a TOS-phantom was scanned using a Toshiba Alexion 6 CT scanner. The images were reconstructed using the FBP and AIDR. Measurements of HU and noise values were performed on images of the “HU linearity” module of the TOS-phantom. The module had five embedded objects, i.e., air, polypropylene, nylon, acrylic, and Delrin. On each object, a circle area of 4.32 cm(2) was drawn and used to measure HU and noise values. The R(2) of the relation between mass densities vs. HU values was used to measure HU linearities at four different tube voltages. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare unpaired data and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The AIDR method produced a significant smaller image noise than the FBP method (p-value < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HU values of images reconstructed using FBP and AIDR methods (p-value > 0.05). The HU values acquired by the methods showed the same linearity marked by coinciding linear lines with the same R(2) value (> 0.999). CONCLUSION: AIDR methods produce the HU linearity as FBP methods with a smaller image noise level. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7166214/ /pubmed/32337189 http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1013 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
I., Suyudi
C., Anam
H., Sutanto
P., Triadyaksa
T., Fujibuchi
Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques
title Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques
title_full Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques
title_fullStr Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques
title_short Comparisons of Hounsfield Unit Linearity between Images Reconstructed using an Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) and a Filter Back-Projection (FBP) Techniques
title_sort comparisons of hounsfield unit linearity between images reconstructed using an adaptive iterative dose reduction (aidr) and a filter back-projection (fbp) techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337189
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1013
work_keys_str_mv AT isuyudi comparisonsofhounsfieldunitlinearitybetweenimagesreconstructedusinganadaptiveiterativedosereductionaidrandafilterbackprojectionfbptechniques
AT canam comparisonsofhounsfieldunitlinearitybetweenimagesreconstructedusinganadaptiveiterativedosereductionaidrandafilterbackprojectionfbptechniques
AT hsutanto comparisonsofhounsfieldunitlinearitybetweenimagesreconstructedusinganadaptiveiterativedosereductionaidrandafilterbackprojectionfbptechniques
AT ptriadyaksa comparisonsofhounsfieldunitlinearitybetweenimagesreconstructedusinganadaptiveiterativedosereductionaidrandafilterbackprojectionfbptechniques
AT tfujibuchi comparisonsofhounsfieldunitlinearitybetweenimagesreconstructedusinganadaptiveiterativedosereductionaidrandafilterbackprojectionfbptechniques