Cargando…
Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up
PURPOSE: To compare IOP and ocular hypotensive medication reduction of using one trabecular microbypass stent versus two in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Setting. Palo Alto Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA. DESIGN: Ret...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1920352 |
_version_ | 1783523528590491648 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Shuo Ittarat, Mantapond Tran, Elaine Ferrell, Patricia Wang, Gloria Fisher, Ann C. Li, Zhongqiu Chang, Robert T. |
author_facet | Yang, Shuo Ittarat, Mantapond Tran, Elaine Ferrell, Patricia Wang, Gloria Fisher, Ann C. Li, Zhongqiu Chang, Robert T. |
author_sort | Yang, Shuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare IOP and ocular hypotensive medication reduction of using one trabecular microbypass stent versus two in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Setting. Palo Alto Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A chart review included patients who underwent trabecular microbypass implantation with cataract surgery in 2015-2017, with at least one-year follow-up. Subjects were divided into two groups by location (always one stent at Stanford versus two stents at the VA). Primary outcome measures included IOP and medication reduction at baseline and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: 132 subjects (166 eyes) were included. The preoperative IOP was 16.3 ± 3.4 mmHg on 2.6 ± 1.1 medications in the one-stent group (N = 85) and 17.5 ± 3.1 mmHg on 2.7 ± 0.6 medications in the two-stent group (N = 81). There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.06). At the 12-month visit, there was a 13.37% ± 2.93 reduction in IOP in the 1-stent group (p ≤ 0.001) and 13.49% ± 2.69 in the 2-stent group (p ≤ 0.001); both were not significantly different from each other (p = 0.074). At 12 months, there was also a 14.5% reduction in medication use for the 1-stent group and 15.3% reduction in the 2-stent group, both statistically significant from baseline, (p = 0.022 and p = 0.037, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation with either one or two stents during cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma demonstrated similar IOP and med reduction in both groups between the two sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7166285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71662852020-04-24 Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up Yang, Shuo Ittarat, Mantapond Tran, Elaine Ferrell, Patricia Wang, Gloria Fisher, Ann C. Li, Zhongqiu Chang, Robert T. Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To compare IOP and ocular hypotensive medication reduction of using one trabecular microbypass stent versus two in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Setting. Palo Alto Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A chart review included patients who underwent trabecular microbypass implantation with cataract surgery in 2015-2017, with at least one-year follow-up. Subjects were divided into two groups by location (always one stent at Stanford versus two stents at the VA). Primary outcome measures included IOP and medication reduction at baseline and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: 132 subjects (166 eyes) were included. The preoperative IOP was 16.3 ± 3.4 mmHg on 2.6 ± 1.1 medications in the one-stent group (N = 85) and 17.5 ± 3.1 mmHg on 2.7 ± 0.6 medications in the two-stent group (N = 81). There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.06). At the 12-month visit, there was a 13.37% ± 2.93 reduction in IOP in the 1-stent group (p ≤ 0.001) and 13.49% ± 2.69 in the 2-stent group (p ≤ 0.001); both were not significantly different from each other (p = 0.074). At 12 months, there was also a 14.5% reduction in medication use for the 1-stent group and 15.3% reduction in the 2-stent group, both statistically significant from baseline, (p = 0.022 and p = 0.037, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation with either one or two stents during cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma demonstrated similar IOP and med reduction in both groups between the two sites. Hindawi 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7166285/ /pubmed/32337227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1920352 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shuo Yang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Shuo Ittarat, Mantapond Tran, Elaine Ferrell, Patricia Wang, Gloria Fisher, Ann C. Li, Zhongqiu Chang, Robert T. Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up |
title | Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_full | Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_short | Comparison of Using One Trabecular Microbypass Stent versus Two during Cataract Surgery at Two Sites: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_sort | comparison of using one trabecular microbypass stent versus two during cataract surgery at two sites: one-year follow-up |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1920352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangshuo comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup AT ittaratmantapond comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup AT tranelaine comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup AT ferrellpatricia comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup AT wanggloria comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup AT fisherannc comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup AT lizhongqiu comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup AT changrobertt comparisonofusingonetrabecularmicrobypassstentversustwoduringcataractsurgeryattwositesoneyearfollowup |