Cargando…
Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Halophytes are better than glycophytes at employing mechanisms to avoid salt injury, but both types of plants can undergo damage due to high soil salinity. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can mitigate the damage from salt stress in both halophytes and glycophytes by enhancing salt tol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7167393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-020-00290-6 |
_version_ | 1783523563147362304 |
---|---|
author | Pan, Jing Peng, Fei Tedeschi, Anna Xue, Xian Wang, Tao Liao, Jie Zhang, Wenjuan Huang, Cuihua |
author_facet | Pan, Jing Peng, Fei Tedeschi, Anna Xue, Xian Wang, Tao Liao, Jie Zhang, Wenjuan Huang, Cuihua |
author_sort | Pan, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Halophytes are better than glycophytes at employing mechanisms to avoid salt injury, but both types of plants can undergo damage due to high soil salinity. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can mitigate the damage from salt stress in both halophytes and glycophytes by enhancing salt tolerance and improving energy efficiency. However, variations in mycorrhizal symbiotic efficiency between halophytes and glycophytes were still poorly understood. Therefore, we evaluated the magnitude of AMF effects on plant growth and determined the mechanisms that regulate the growth response of halophytes and glycophytes by performing a meta-analysis of 916 studies (from 182 publications). RESULTS: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi significantly enhance biomass accumulation, osmolytes synthesis (soluble sugar and soluble protein), nutrients acquisition (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ion), antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase and catalase), and photosynthetic capacity (chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate). AMF also substantially decreased sodium ion acquisition and malondialdehyde levels in both halophytes and glycophytes under salt stress conditions. Mycorrhizal halophytes deploy inorganic ions (potassium and calcium ions) and limited organic osmolytes (proline and soluble sugar) to achieve energy-efficient osmotic adjustment and further promote biomass accumulation. Mycorrhizal glycophytes depend on the combined actions of soluble sugar accumulation, nutrients acquisition, sodium ion exclusion, superoxide dismutase elevation, and chlorophyll synthesis to achieve biomass accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation is complementary to plant function under salt stress conditions, not only facilitating energy acquisition but also redistributing energy from stress defence to growth. Glycophytes are more dependent on AMF symbiosis than halophytes under salt stress conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7167393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71673932020-04-23 Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis Pan, Jing Peng, Fei Tedeschi, Anna Xue, Xian Wang, Tao Liao, Jie Zhang, Wenjuan Huang, Cuihua Bot Stud Original Article BACKGROUND: Halophytes are better than glycophytes at employing mechanisms to avoid salt injury, but both types of plants can undergo damage due to high soil salinity. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can mitigate the damage from salt stress in both halophytes and glycophytes by enhancing salt tolerance and improving energy efficiency. However, variations in mycorrhizal symbiotic efficiency between halophytes and glycophytes were still poorly understood. Therefore, we evaluated the magnitude of AMF effects on plant growth and determined the mechanisms that regulate the growth response of halophytes and glycophytes by performing a meta-analysis of 916 studies (from 182 publications). RESULTS: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi significantly enhance biomass accumulation, osmolytes synthesis (soluble sugar and soluble protein), nutrients acquisition (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ion), antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase and catalase), and photosynthetic capacity (chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate). AMF also substantially decreased sodium ion acquisition and malondialdehyde levels in both halophytes and glycophytes under salt stress conditions. Mycorrhizal halophytes deploy inorganic ions (potassium and calcium ions) and limited organic osmolytes (proline and soluble sugar) to achieve energy-efficient osmotic adjustment and further promote biomass accumulation. Mycorrhizal glycophytes depend on the combined actions of soluble sugar accumulation, nutrients acquisition, sodium ion exclusion, superoxide dismutase elevation, and chlorophyll synthesis to achieve biomass accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation is complementary to plant function under salt stress conditions, not only facilitating energy acquisition but also redistributing energy from stress defence to growth. Glycophytes are more dependent on AMF symbiosis than halophytes under salt stress conditions. Springer Singapore 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7167393/ /pubmed/32307601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-020-00290-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pan, Jing Peng, Fei Tedeschi, Anna Xue, Xian Wang, Tao Liao, Jie Zhang, Wenjuan Huang, Cuihua Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis |
title | Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis |
title_full | Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis |
title_short | Do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? A meta-analysis |
title_sort | do halophytes and glycophytes differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress? a meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7167393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-020-00290-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panjing dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis AT pengfei dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis AT tedeschianna dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis AT xuexian dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis AT wangtao dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis AT liaojie dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis AT zhangwenjuan dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis AT huangcuihua dohalophytesandglycophytesdifferintheirinteractionswitharbuscularmycorrhizalfungiundersaltstressametaanalysis |