Cargando…

Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Standard-dose, seasonal, trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine induces moderate-to-low haemagglutination-inhibition antibody responses in people living with HIV. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes, Marta C, Cutland, Clare L, Moultrie, Andrew, Jones, Stephanie, Ortiz, Justin R, Neuzil, Kathleen M, Klugman, Keith P, Simões, Eric A F, Weinberg, Adriana, Madhi, Shabir A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7167514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30322-4
_version_ 1783523576663506944
author Nunes, Marta C
Cutland, Clare L
Moultrie, Andrew
Jones, Stephanie
Ortiz, Justin R
Neuzil, Kathleen M
Klugman, Keith P
Simões, Eric A F
Weinberg, Adriana
Madhi, Shabir A
author_facet Nunes, Marta C
Cutland, Clare L
Moultrie, Andrew
Jones, Stephanie
Ortiz, Justin R
Neuzil, Kathleen M
Klugman, Keith P
Simões, Eric A F
Weinberg, Adriana
Madhi, Shabir A
author_sort Nunes, Marta C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standard-dose, seasonal, trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine induces moderate-to-low haemagglutination-inhibition antibody responses in people living with HIV. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women living with HIV in South Africa. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited pregnant women with HIV from seven antenatal clinics in Soweto, South Africa. Pregnant women were eligible if they were aged 18–38 years, infected with HIV, and had an estimated gestational age of 12–36 weeks. Women were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a computer-generated randomisation list, to receive inactivated influenza vaccine containing 15 μg of each of the three seasonal influenza strains for that year, as a single dose, a double dose, or two single doses 1 month apart. Participants and study personnel were masked to group allocation. Haemagglutination-inhibition antibody responses were measured for all groups in the mothers at enrolment and at 1 month after each vaccine dose, and in the single-dose and double-dose groups within 7 days of birth in the neonates. Immunogenicity analyses only included women with visits 28–35 days apart and infants who were born at least 28 days after maternal immunisation. The primary was seroconversion rate to each of the vaccine strains in the mothers 1 month after completion of the dosing schedule, and the primary safety outcomes were frequency of local and systemic reactions. Safety was assessed in mothers and infants until 24 weeks post partum and analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01527825, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, and June 6, 2013, 800 pregnant women living with HIV were enrolled and randomly assigned to the single-dose (n=266), double-dose (n=265), or two-single-doses (n=269) group. In the analysable population, seroconversion rates in mothers 1 month after the final vaccine dose were significantly higher in the double-dose group (n=230; ranging from 29% to 65% for the three vaccine strains) than in the single-dose group (n=230; ranging from 18% to 49%; p≤0·019 for the three vaccine strains), but were similar between the two-single-doses group (n=220; ranging from 23% to 52%) and the single-dose group (p≥0·20 for the three vaccine strains). Safety outcomes were similar in the three groups, except for more injection-site reactions in recipients in the double-dose group. INTERPRETATION: A regimen of double-dose inactivated influenza vaccine gave slightly greater immunogenicity than did a single-dose regimen in pregnant women living with HIV. However, immunogenicity in the double-dose group was still lower than historical data from the same setting in pregnant women without HIV. More immunogenic vaccines are needed for pregnant women living with HIV to enhance transplacental transfer of vaccine-induced protective antibodies to their newborn infants. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7167514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71675142020-04-22 Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial Nunes, Marta C Cutland, Clare L Moultrie, Andrew Jones, Stephanie Ortiz, Justin R Neuzil, Kathleen M Klugman, Keith P Simões, Eric A F Weinberg, Adriana Madhi, Shabir A Lancet HIV Article BACKGROUND: Standard-dose, seasonal, trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine induces moderate-to-low haemagglutination-inhibition antibody responses in people living with HIV. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women living with HIV in South Africa. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited pregnant women with HIV from seven antenatal clinics in Soweto, South Africa. Pregnant women were eligible if they were aged 18–38 years, infected with HIV, and had an estimated gestational age of 12–36 weeks. Women were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a computer-generated randomisation list, to receive inactivated influenza vaccine containing 15 μg of each of the three seasonal influenza strains for that year, as a single dose, a double dose, or two single doses 1 month apart. Participants and study personnel were masked to group allocation. Haemagglutination-inhibition antibody responses were measured for all groups in the mothers at enrolment and at 1 month after each vaccine dose, and in the single-dose and double-dose groups within 7 days of birth in the neonates. Immunogenicity analyses only included women with visits 28–35 days apart and infants who were born at least 28 days after maternal immunisation. The primary was seroconversion rate to each of the vaccine strains in the mothers 1 month after completion of the dosing schedule, and the primary safety outcomes were frequency of local and systemic reactions. Safety was assessed in mothers and infants until 24 weeks post partum and analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01527825, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, and June 6, 2013, 800 pregnant women living with HIV were enrolled and randomly assigned to the single-dose (n=266), double-dose (n=265), or two-single-doses (n=269) group. In the analysable population, seroconversion rates in mothers 1 month after the final vaccine dose were significantly higher in the double-dose group (n=230; ranging from 29% to 65% for the three vaccine strains) than in the single-dose group (n=230; ranging from 18% to 49%; p≤0·019 for the three vaccine strains), but were similar between the two-single-doses group (n=220; ranging from 23% to 52%) and the single-dose group (p≥0·20 for the three vaccine strains). Safety outcomes were similar in the three groups, except for more injection-site reactions in recipients in the double-dose group. INTERPRETATION: A regimen of double-dose inactivated influenza vaccine gave slightly greater immunogenicity than did a single-dose regimen in pregnant women living with HIV. However, immunogenicity in the double-dose group was still lower than historical data from the same setting in pregnant women without HIV. More immunogenic vaccines are needed for pregnant women living with HIV to enhance transplacental transfer of vaccine-induced protective antibodies to their newborn infants. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Elsevier B.V 2020-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7167514/ /pubmed/31911146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30322-4 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nunes, Marta C
Cutland, Clare L
Moultrie, Andrew
Jones, Stephanie
Ortiz, Justin R
Neuzil, Kathleen M
Klugman, Keith P
Simões, Eric A F
Weinberg, Adriana
Madhi, Shabir A
Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial
title Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with HIV: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort immunogenicity and safety of different dosing schedules of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women with hiv: a randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7167514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30322-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nunesmartac immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cutlandclarel immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moultrieandrew immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jonesstephanie immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ortizjustinr immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT neuzilkathleenm immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT klugmankeithp immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simoesericaf immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weinbergadriana immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT madhishabira immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT immunogenicityandsafetyofdifferentdosingschedulesoftrivalentinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinpregnantwomenwithhivarandomisedcontrolledtrial