Cargando…
Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center
Background: Blood group testing is an important part of supplying safe blood components in blood transfusion centers. Blood group discrepancy develops when reactions in forward grouping do not correspond with reverse grouping or if the preceding and recent results do not match. This study aimed to e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7167605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337013 |
_version_ | 1783523596193234944 |
---|---|
author | Javadzadeh Shahshahani, Hayedeh Hayati, Azam |
author_facet | Javadzadeh Shahshahani, Hayedeh Hayati, Azam |
author_sort | Javadzadeh Shahshahani, Hayedeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Blood group testing is an important part of supplying safe blood components in blood transfusion centers. Blood group discrepancy develops when reactions in forward grouping do not correspond with reverse grouping or if the preceding and recent results do not match. This study aimed to evaluate ABO blood group discrepancies among blood donors of Yazd, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data of blood donors were obtained from the integrated database of Yazd Blood Transfusion Center during a period of eight years (2010 – 2017). Tube testing was used for determining the ABO blood groups. A serological workup was performed for diagnosis and determination of the discrepancy. Confirmation of the results was accomplished by the reference laboratory of immunohematology. Results: Blood group discrepancies were detected in 130 (0.04%) out of 322,222 donations. Technical/Clerical errors leading to ABO discrepancy were noticed in 12 (9.3%) cases. The most frequent cause of ABO discrepancies in forward grouping was subgroups of A Antigen (44.6%) and in reverse grouping was cold autoantibody (23.9%). There were 11 (8.4%) cases with alloantibodies. Two blood donors with rare Bombay phenotype and p blood group were also identified. Conclusion : For minimizing Technical/Clerical errors, accurate blood donor or sample identification programs should be implemented. All cases of blood group discrepancies should be carefully investigated, and blood donors should be informed appropriately. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7167605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71676052020-04-24 Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center Javadzadeh Shahshahani, Hayedeh Hayati, Azam Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res Original Article Background: Blood group testing is an important part of supplying safe blood components in blood transfusion centers. Blood group discrepancy develops when reactions in forward grouping do not correspond with reverse grouping or if the preceding and recent results do not match. This study aimed to evaluate ABO blood group discrepancies among blood donors of Yazd, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data of blood donors were obtained from the integrated database of Yazd Blood Transfusion Center during a period of eight years (2010 – 2017). Tube testing was used for determining the ABO blood groups. A serological workup was performed for diagnosis and determination of the discrepancy. Confirmation of the results was accomplished by the reference laboratory of immunohematology. Results: Blood group discrepancies were detected in 130 (0.04%) out of 322,222 donations. Technical/Clerical errors leading to ABO discrepancy were noticed in 12 (9.3%) cases. The most frequent cause of ABO discrepancies in forward grouping was subgroups of A Antigen (44.6%) and in reverse grouping was cold autoantibody (23.9%). There were 11 (8.4%) cases with alloantibodies. Two blood donors with rare Bombay phenotype and p blood group were also identified. Conclusion : For minimizing Technical/Clerical errors, accurate blood donor or sample identification programs should be implemented. All cases of blood group discrepancies should be carefully investigated, and blood donors should be informed appropriately. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7167605/ /pubmed/32337013 Text en Copyright : © International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research & Tehran University of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Javadzadeh Shahshahani, Hayedeh Hayati, Azam Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center |
title | Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center |
title_full | Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center |
title_fullStr | Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center |
title_short | Blood Group Discrepancies at a Regional Blood Center |
title_sort | blood group discrepancies at a regional blood center |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7167605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javadzadehshahshahanihayedeh bloodgroupdiscrepanciesataregionalbloodcenter AT hayatiazam bloodgroupdiscrepanciesataregionalbloodcenter |