Cargando…
Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort
Introduction: Reliable and cost-effective diagnostics for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection are necessary. The aim of our study was to investigate which diagnostic test is most accurate to detect HEV infection in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients in a real world setting. Patients and Met...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020137 |
_version_ | 1783523645872668672 |
---|---|
author | Anastasiou, Olympia E. Thodou, Viktoria Berger, Annemarie Wedemeyer, Heiner Ciesek, Sandra |
author_facet | Anastasiou, Olympia E. Thodou, Viktoria Berger, Annemarie Wedemeyer, Heiner Ciesek, Sandra |
author_sort | Anastasiou, Olympia E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Reliable and cost-effective diagnostics for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection are necessary. The aim of our study was to investigate which diagnostic test is most accurate to detect HEV infection in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients in a real world setting. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1165 patients tested for HEV antibodies and HEV PCR at the same time point. Clinical, laboratory and virological data were taken from patient charts. HEV IgA was measured in a subgroup of 185 patients. Results: HEV RNA was detectable in 61 patients (5.2%); most of them (n = 49, 80.3%/n = 43, 70.5%) were HEV IgM+ and IgG+; however, 12 patients (19.6%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgM negative and 17 patients (27.8%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgG negative. Ten HEV RNA positive patients (16.4%) had neither HEV IgG nor IgM antibodies. Importantly, all of them were immunosuppressed. HEV IgA testing was less sensitive than HEV IgM for HEV diagnosis. Conclusions: HEV infection can be overlooked in patients without HEV specific antibodies. Performing PCR is necessary to diagnose or exclude HEV infection in immunocompromised hosts. In immunocompetent patients, a screening based on HEV antibodies (IgG/IgM) is sufficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7168254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71682542020-04-22 Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort Anastasiou, Olympia E. Thodou, Viktoria Berger, Annemarie Wedemeyer, Heiner Ciesek, Sandra Pathogens Article Introduction: Reliable and cost-effective diagnostics for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection are necessary. The aim of our study was to investigate which diagnostic test is most accurate to detect HEV infection in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients in a real world setting. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1165 patients tested for HEV antibodies and HEV PCR at the same time point. Clinical, laboratory and virological data were taken from patient charts. HEV IgA was measured in a subgroup of 185 patients. Results: HEV RNA was detectable in 61 patients (5.2%); most of them (n = 49, 80.3%/n = 43, 70.5%) were HEV IgM+ and IgG+; however, 12 patients (19.6%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgM negative and 17 patients (27.8%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgG negative. Ten HEV RNA positive patients (16.4%) had neither HEV IgG nor IgM antibodies. Importantly, all of them were immunosuppressed. HEV IgA testing was less sensitive than HEV IgM for HEV diagnosis. Conclusions: HEV infection can be overlooked in patients without HEV specific antibodies. Performing PCR is necessary to diagnose or exclude HEV infection in immunocompromised hosts. In immunocompetent patients, a screening based on HEV antibodies (IgG/IgM) is sufficient. MDPI 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7168254/ /pubmed/32093070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020137 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Anastasiou, Olympia E. Thodou, Viktoria Berger, Annemarie Wedemeyer, Heiner Ciesek, Sandra Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort |
title | Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort |
title_full | Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort |
title_short | Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort |
title_sort | comprehensive evaluation of hepatitis e serology and molecular testing in a large cohort |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anastasiouolympiae comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort AT thodouviktoria comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort AT bergerannemarie comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort AT wedemeyerheiner comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort AT cieseksandra comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort |