Cargando…

Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort

Introduction: Reliable and cost-effective diagnostics for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection are necessary. The aim of our study was to investigate which diagnostic test is most accurate to detect HEV infection in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients in a real world setting. Patients and Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anastasiou, Olympia E., Thodou, Viktoria, Berger, Annemarie, Wedemeyer, Heiner, Ciesek, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020137
_version_ 1783523645872668672
author Anastasiou, Olympia E.
Thodou, Viktoria
Berger, Annemarie
Wedemeyer, Heiner
Ciesek, Sandra
author_facet Anastasiou, Olympia E.
Thodou, Viktoria
Berger, Annemarie
Wedemeyer, Heiner
Ciesek, Sandra
author_sort Anastasiou, Olympia E.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Reliable and cost-effective diagnostics for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection are necessary. The aim of our study was to investigate which diagnostic test is most accurate to detect HEV infection in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients in a real world setting. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1165 patients tested for HEV antibodies and HEV PCR at the same time point. Clinical, laboratory and virological data were taken from patient charts. HEV IgA was measured in a subgroup of 185 patients. Results: HEV RNA was detectable in 61 patients (5.2%); most of them (n = 49, 80.3%/n = 43, 70.5%) were HEV IgM+ and IgG+; however, 12 patients (19.6%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgM negative and 17 patients (27.8%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgG negative. Ten HEV RNA positive patients (16.4%) had neither HEV IgG nor IgM antibodies. Importantly, all of them were immunosuppressed. HEV IgA testing was less sensitive than HEV IgM for HEV diagnosis. Conclusions: HEV infection can be overlooked in patients without HEV specific antibodies. Performing PCR is necessary to diagnose or exclude HEV infection in immunocompromised hosts. In immunocompetent patients, a screening based on HEV antibodies (IgG/IgM) is sufficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7168254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71682542020-04-22 Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort Anastasiou, Olympia E. Thodou, Viktoria Berger, Annemarie Wedemeyer, Heiner Ciesek, Sandra Pathogens Article Introduction: Reliable and cost-effective diagnostics for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection are necessary. The aim of our study was to investigate which diagnostic test is most accurate to detect HEV infection in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients in a real world setting. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1165 patients tested for HEV antibodies and HEV PCR at the same time point. Clinical, laboratory and virological data were taken from patient charts. HEV IgA was measured in a subgroup of 185 patients. Results: HEV RNA was detectable in 61 patients (5.2%); most of them (n = 49, 80.3%/n = 43, 70.5%) were HEV IgM+ and IgG+; however, 12 patients (19.6%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgM negative and 17 patients (27.8%) were HEV RNA positive/HEV IgG negative. Ten HEV RNA positive patients (16.4%) had neither HEV IgG nor IgM antibodies. Importantly, all of them were immunosuppressed. HEV IgA testing was less sensitive than HEV IgM for HEV diagnosis. Conclusions: HEV infection can be overlooked in patients without HEV specific antibodies. Performing PCR is necessary to diagnose or exclude HEV infection in immunocompromised hosts. In immunocompetent patients, a screening based on HEV antibodies (IgG/IgM) is sufficient. MDPI 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7168254/ /pubmed/32093070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020137 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Anastasiou, Olympia E.
Thodou, Viktoria
Berger, Annemarie
Wedemeyer, Heiner
Ciesek, Sandra
Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort
title Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort
title_full Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort
title_fullStr Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort
title_short Comprehensive Evaluation of Hepatitis E Serology and Molecular Testing in a Large Cohort
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of hepatitis e serology and molecular testing in a large cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020137
work_keys_str_mv AT anastasiouolympiae comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort
AT thodouviktoria comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort
AT bergerannemarie comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort
AT wedemeyerheiner comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort
AT cieseksandra comprehensiveevaluationofhepatitiseserologyandmoleculartestinginalargecohort