Cargando…

Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is a rapidly proliferating tumor. Patients bear an inferior prognosis with a median survival time of 14-16 months. Proliferation and repopulation are a major resistance promoting factor for conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Tumor-Treating-Fields (TTFields) are an ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guberina, N., Pöttgen, C., Kebir, S., Lazaridis, L., Scharmberg, C., Lübcke, W., Niessen, M., Guberina, M., Scheffler, B., Jendrossek, V., Jabbarli, R., Pierscianek, D., Sure, U., Schmidt, T., Oster, C., Hau, P., Grosu, A. L., Stuschke, M., Glas, M., Nour, Y., Lüdemann, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01521-7
_version_ 1783523720969584640
author Guberina, N.
Pöttgen, C.
Kebir, S.
Lazaridis, L.
Scharmberg, C.
Lübcke, W.
Niessen, M.
Guberina, M.
Scheffler, B.
Jendrossek, V.
Jabbarli, R.
Pierscianek, D.
Sure, U.
Schmidt, T.
Oster, C.
Hau, P.
Grosu, A. L.
Stuschke, M.
Glas, M.
Nour, Y.
Lüdemann, L.
author_facet Guberina, N.
Pöttgen, C.
Kebir, S.
Lazaridis, L.
Scharmberg, C.
Lübcke, W.
Niessen, M.
Guberina, M.
Scheffler, B.
Jendrossek, V.
Jabbarli, R.
Pierscianek, D.
Sure, U.
Schmidt, T.
Oster, C.
Hau, P.
Grosu, A. L.
Stuschke, M.
Glas, M.
Nour, Y.
Lüdemann, L.
author_sort Guberina, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is a rapidly proliferating tumor. Patients bear an inferior prognosis with a median survival time of 14-16 months. Proliferation and repopulation are a major resistance promoting factor for conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Tumor-Treating-Fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic modality applying low-intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate-frequency (100-300 kHz) alternating electric-fields. More recently interference of TTFields with DNA-damage-repair and synergistic effects with radiotherapy were reported in the preclinical setting. This study aims at examining the dosimetric consequences of TTFields applied during the course of radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Cone-beam-computed-tomography (CBCT)-data from the first seven patients of the PriCoTTF-phase-I-trial were used in a predefined way for dosimetric verification and dose-accumulation of the non-coplanar-intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT)-treatment-plans as well as geometric analysis of the transducer-arrays by which TTFields are applied throughout the course of treatment. Transducer-array-position and contours were obtained from the low-dose CBCT’s routinely made for image-guidance. Material-composition of the electrodes was determined and a respective Hounsfield-unit was assigned to the electrodes. After 6D-fusion with the planning-CT, the dose-distribution was recalculated using a Boltzmann-equation-solver (Acuros XB) and a Monte-Carlo-dose-calculation-engine. RESULTS: Overdosage in the scalp in comparison to the treatment plan without electrodes stayed below 8.5% of the prescribed dose in the first 2 mm below and also in deeper layers outside 1cm(2) at highest dose as obtained from dose-volume-histogram comparisons. In the clinical target volume (CTV), underdosage was limited to 2.0% due to dose attenuation by the electrodes in terms of D95 and the effective-uniform-dose. Principal-component-analysis (PCA) showed that the first principal-position-component of the variation of repeated array-placement in the direction of the largest variations and the perpendicular second-component spanning a tangential plane on the skull had a standard deviation of 1.06 cm, 1.23 cm, 0.96 cm, and 1.11 cm for the frontal, occipital, left and right arrays for the first and 0.70 cm, 0.71 cm, 0.79 cm, and 0.68 cm, respectively for the second-principal-component. The variations did not differ from patient-to-patient (p > 0.8, Kruskal-Wallis-tests). This motion led to a diminution of the dosimetric effects of the electrodes. CONCLUSION: From a dosimetric point of view, dose deviations in the CTV due to transducer-arrays were not clinically significant in the first 7 patients and confirmed feasibility of combined adjuvant radiochemotherapy and concurrent TTFields. PriCoTTF Trial: A phase I/II trial of TTFields prior and concomitant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. DRKS-ID: DRKS00016667. Date of Registration in DRKS: 2019/02/26. Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT): yes. Ethics Approval/Approval of the Ethics Committee: Approved. (leading) Ethics Committee Nr.: 18–8316-MF, Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen. Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen. EUDAMED-No. (for studies acc. to Medical Devices act): CIV-18-08-025247.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7168823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71688232020-04-23 Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial Guberina, N. Pöttgen, C. Kebir, S. Lazaridis, L. Scharmberg, C. Lübcke, W. Niessen, M. Guberina, M. Scheffler, B. Jendrossek, V. Jabbarli, R. Pierscianek, D. Sure, U. Schmidt, T. Oster, C. Hau, P. Grosu, A. L. Stuschke, M. Glas, M. Nour, Y. Lüdemann, L. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is a rapidly proliferating tumor. Patients bear an inferior prognosis with a median survival time of 14-16 months. Proliferation and repopulation are a major resistance promoting factor for conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Tumor-Treating-Fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic modality applying low-intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate-frequency (100-300 kHz) alternating electric-fields. More recently interference of TTFields with DNA-damage-repair and synergistic effects with radiotherapy were reported in the preclinical setting. This study aims at examining the dosimetric consequences of TTFields applied during the course of radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Cone-beam-computed-tomography (CBCT)-data from the first seven patients of the PriCoTTF-phase-I-trial were used in a predefined way for dosimetric verification and dose-accumulation of the non-coplanar-intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT)-treatment-plans as well as geometric analysis of the transducer-arrays by which TTFields are applied throughout the course of treatment. Transducer-array-position and contours were obtained from the low-dose CBCT’s routinely made for image-guidance. Material-composition of the electrodes was determined and a respective Hounsfield-unit was assigned to the electrodes. After 6D-fusion with the planning-CT, the dose-distribution was recalculated using a Boltzmann-equation-solver (Acuros XB) and a Monte-Carlo-dose-calculation-engine. RESULTS: Overdosage in the scalp in comparison to the treatment plan without electrodes stayed below 8.5% of the prescribed dose in the first 2 mm below and also in deeper layers outside 1cm(2) at highest dose as obtained from dose-volume-histogram comparisons. In the clinical target volume (CTV), underdosage was limited to 2.0% due to dose attenuation by the electrodes in terms of D95 and the effective-uniform-dose. Principal-component-analysis (PCA) showed that the first principal-position-component of the variation of repeated array-placement in the direction of the largest variations and the perpendicular second-component spanning a tangential plane on the skull had a standard deviation of 1.06 cm, 1.23 cm, 0.96 cm, and 1.11 cm for the frontal, occipital, left and right arrays for the first and 0.70 cm, 0.71 cm, 0.79 cm, and 0.68 cm, respectively for the second-principal-component. The variations did not differ from patient-to-patient (p > 0.8, Kruskal-Wallis-tests). This motion led to a diminution of the dosimetric effects of the electrodes. CONCLUSION: From a dosimetric point of view, dose deviations in the CTV due to transducer-arrays were not clinically significant in the first 7 patients and confirmed feasibility of combined adjuvant radiochemotherapy and concurrent TTFields. PriCoTTF Trial: A phase I/II trial of TTFields prior and concomitant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. DRKS-ID: DRKS00016667. Date of Registration in DRKS: 2019/02/26. Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT): yes. Ethics Approval/Approval of the Ethics Committee: Approved. (leading) Ethics Committee Nr.: 18–8316-MF, Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen. Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen. EUDAMED-No. (for studies acc. to Medical Devices act): CIV-18-08-025247. BioMed Central 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7168823/ /pubmed/32307022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01521-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Guberina, N.
Pöttgen, C.
Kebir, S.
Lazaridis, L.
Scharmberg, C.
Lübcke, W.
Niessen, M.
Guberina, M.
Scheffler, B.
Jendrossek, V.
Jabbarli, R.
Pierscianek, D.
Sure, U.
Schmidt, T.
Oster, C.
Hau, P.
Grosu, A. L.
Stuschke, M.
Glas, M.
Nour, Y.
Lüdemann, L.
Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial
title Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial
title_full Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial
title_fullStr Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial
title_full_unstemmed Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial
title_short Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial
title_sort combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (ttfields) for glioblastoma: dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar imrt as initial results from a phase i trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01521-7
work_keys_str_mv AT guberinan combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT pottgenc combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT kebirs combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT lazaridisl combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT scharmbergc combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT lubckew combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT niessenm combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT guberinam combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT schefflerb combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT jendrossekv combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT jabbarlir combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT pierscianekd combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT sureu combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT schmidtt combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT osterc combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT haup combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT grosual combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT stuschkem combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT glasm combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT noury combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial
AT ludemannl combinedradiotherapyandconcurrenttumortreatingfieldsttfieldsforglioblastomadosimetricconsequencesonnoncoplanarimrtasinitialresultsfromaphaseitrial