Cargando…

Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Intensified preventive regimen based on a ‘high-risk’ approach has been proposed instead the routine prevention that is generally given to the whole population. The effectiveness of these regimens may still be an issue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare two preventive progr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pisarnturakit, Pagaporn, Detsomboonrat, Palinee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01107-5
_version_ 1783523730721341440
author Pisarnturakit, Pagaporn
Detsomboonrat, Palinee
author_facet Pisarnturakit, Pagaporn
Detsomboonrat, Palinee
author_sort Pisarnturakit, Pagaporn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intensified preventive regimen based on a ‘high-risk’ approach has been proposed instead the routine prevention that is generally given to the whole population. The effectiveness of these regimens may still be an issue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare two preventive programs carried out in a Public School for kindergarten children. METHODS: The data from clinical examinations were used to assess the caries risk for 121 children. Children with at least 2 carious lesions were considered as high risk for dental caries development. These children were randomized into two groups. Half (High risk basic-HRB group) were provided the basic prevention regimen (oral-hygiene instruction and hands-on brushing practice for teachers and caregivers, daytime tooth brushing supervised by teachers at least once a week, newly erupted first permanent molar sealant, provision of toothbrush, fluoride-containing dentifrice, and a guidebook), which was also given to low-risk children (Low risk basic-LRB group). The other half (High risk intensive-HRI group) were additionally given an intensified preventive regimen (F-varnish application, primary molar sealant, and silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application on carious lesions). Clinical examinations were performed semiannually to determine the dmfs caries increment of the three groups. RESULTS: The 89 children completed the 24-month examination were 3- to 5-year-old with 19, 35, and 35 children in the LRB, HRB, and HRI group, respectively. The new caries development at 24 months of the HRB group (75%) was higher than that of the HRI group (65.7%) and the LRB group (21.1%). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated no significant differences of caries increment between the HRB and HRI groups at the end of our study (p = 0.709). CONCLUSIONS: The negligible difference in caries increment between the HRI and HRB groups implies that intensified prevention produced minimal additional benefit. Offering all children only basic prevention could have obtained virtually the same preventive effect with substantially less effort and lower cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR), TCTR20180124001. Registered 24 January 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7168866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71688662020-04-23 Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial Pisarnturakit, Pagaporn Detsomboonrat, Palinee BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Intensified preventive regimen based on a ‘high-risk’ approach has been proposed instead the routine prevention that is generally given to the whole population. The effectiveness of these regimens may still be an issue. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare two preventive programs carried out in a Public School for kindergarten children. METHODS: The data from clinical examinations were used to assess the caries risk for 121 children. Children with at least 2 carious lesions were considered as high risk for dental caries development. These children were randomized into two groups. Half (High risk basic-HRB group) were provided the basic prevention regimen (oral-hygiene instruction and hands-on brushing practice for teachers and caregivers, daytime tooth brushing supervised by teachers at least once a week, newly erupted first permanent molar sealant, provision of toothbrush, fluoride-containing dentifrice, and a guidebook), which was also given to low-risk children (Low risk basic-LRB group). The other half (High risk intensive-HRI group) were additionally given an intensified preventive regimen (F-varnish application, primary molar sealant, and silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application on carious lesions). Clinical examinations were performed semiannually to determine the dmfs caries increment of the three groups. RESULTS: The 89 children completed the 24-month examination were 3- to 5-year-old with 19, 35, and 35 children in the LRB, HRB, and HRI group, respectively. The new caries development at 24 months of the HRB group (75%) was higher than that of the HRI group (65.7%) and the LRB group (21.1%). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated no significant differences of caries increment between the HRB and HRI groups at the end of our study (p = 0.709). CONCLUSIONS: The negligible difference in caries increment between the HRI and HRB groups implies that intensified prevention produced minimal additional benefit. Offering all children only basic prevention could have obtained virtually the same preventive effect with substantially less effort and lower cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR), TCTR20180124001. Registered 24 January 2018 - Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7168866/ /pubmed/32306953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01107-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pisarnturakit, Pagaporn
Detsomboonrat, Palinee
Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of two caries prevention programs among Thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of two caries prevention programs among thai kindergarten: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01107-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pisarnturakitpagaporn comparisonoftwocariespreventionprogramsamongthaikindergartenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT detsomboonratpalinee comparisonoftwocariespreventionprogramsamongthaikindergartenarandomizedcontrolledtrial