Cargando…

Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases

BACKGROUND: Perforation of a marginal peptic ulcer after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can lead to severe conditions, although its clinical features have not been well reported. In this article, we present three cases of marginal peptic ulcer perforation after PD that we experienced in our institute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shioi, Ikuma, Yokoyama, Naoyuki, Hirai, Motoharu, Komatsu, Masaru, Kubota, Akira, Aoki, Makoto, Sato, Daisuke, Otani, Tetsuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00743-6
_version_ 1783523750639042560
author Shioi, Ikuma
Yokoyama, Naoyuki
Hirai, Motoharu
Komatsu, Masaru
Kubota, Akira
Aoki, Makoto
Sato, Daisuke
Otani, Tetsuya
author_facet Shioi, Ikuma
Yokoyama, Naoyuki
Hirai, Motoharu
Komatsu, Masaru
Kubota, Akira
Aoki, Makoto
Sato, Daisuke
Otani, Tetsuya
author_sort Shioi, Ikuma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perforation of a marginal peptic ulcer after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can lead to severe conditions, although its clinical features have not been well reported. In this article, we present three cases of marginal peptic ulcer perforation after PD that we experienced in our institute and attempt to clarify its appropriate treatment and prevention. CASE PRESENTATION: Marginal ulcer perforation confirmed with computed tomography and/or surgical exploration occurred in 3 (1.8%) of 163 consecutive patients who underwent PD (including 160 patients who underwent a total or subtotal stomach-preserving procedure) at our institution. The three patients (one man and two women) had a median age of 77 (65–79) years. Two of these patients had a medical history of duodenal peptic ulcer. All three patients had biliary neoplasms. Two of the patients underwent subtotal stomach-preserving PD with antro-jejunal anastomosis, and the other patient underwent pylorus-preserving PD with duodenal jejunostomy. The perforation occurred with a sudden and severe onset of abdominal pain 34, 94, and 1204 days, respectively, after the PDs. At the time of the perforation, all of the patients had been withdrawn from postoperative prophylactic antipeptic ulcer agents, with the cessation periods ranging from 12 to 1008 days. In addition, all the patients were in fasting conditions for 1 to 13 days just before the perforation. Surgical treatment with direct suturing of the perforated ulcer was performed for two patients, while conservative therapy was performed for one patient. Their primary treatment courses were satisfactory. Chronic antisecretory agent therapy was prescribed for 562, 271, and 2370 days, respectively, from marginal ulcer perforation, and no ulcer recurrence was noted in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of antisecretory therapy and fasting were considered an essential cause of marginal peptic ulcer perforation after PD. In addition, unlike the native duodenum, the jejunal limb used for reconstruction to a preserved stomach may be at increased risk of ulceration. Chronic permanent administration of antisecretory agents and fasting avoidance are desirable for patients who have undergone stomach-preserving PD to prevent marginal ulcer perforation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7168954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71689542020-04-23 Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases Shioi, Ikuma Yokoyama, Naoyuki Hirai, Motoharu Komatsu, Masaru Kubota, Akira Aoki, Makoto Sato, Daisuke Otani, Tetsuya BMC Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: Perforation of a marginal peptic ulcer after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can lead to severe conditions, although its clinical features have not been well reported. In this article, we present three cases of marginal peptic ulcer perforation after PD that we experienced in our institute and attempt to clarify its appropriate treatment and prevention. CASE PRESENTATION: Marginal ulcer perforation confirmed with computed tomography and/or surgical exploration occurred in 3 (1.8%) of 163 consecutive patients who underwent PD (including 160 patients who underwent a total or subtotal stomach-preserving procedure) at our institution. The three patients (one man and two women) had a median age of 77 (65–79) years. Two of these patients had a medical history of duodenal peptic ulcer. All three patients had biliary neoplasms. Two of the patients underwent subtotal stomach-preserving PD with antro-jejunal anastomosis, and the other patient underwent pylorus-preserving PD with duodenal jejunostomy. The perforation occurred with a sudden and severe onset of abdominal pain 34, 94, and 1204 days, respectively, after the PDs. At the time of the perforation, all of the patients had been withdrawn from postoperative prophylactic antipeptic ulcer agents, with the cessation periods ranging from 12 to 1008 days. In addition, all the patients were in fasting conditions for 1 to 13 days just before the perforation. Surgical treatment with direct suturing of the perforated ulcer was performed for two patients, while conservative therapy was performed for one patient. Their primary treatment courses were satisfactory. Chronic antisecretory agent therapy was prescribed for 562, 271, and 2370 days, respectively, from marginal ulcer perforation, and no ulcer recurrence was noted in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of antisecretory therapy and fasting were considered an essential cause of marginal peptic ulcer perforation after PD. In addition, unlike the native duodenum, the jejunal limb used for reconstruction to a preserved stomach may be at increased risk of ulceration. Chronic permanent administration of antisecretory agents and fasting avoidance are desirable for patients who have undergone stomach-preserving PD to prevent marginal ulcer perforation. BioMed Central 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7168954/ /pubmed/32306934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00743-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Report
Shioi, Ikuma
Yokoyama, Naoyuki
Hirai, Motoharu
Komatsu, Masaru
Kubota, Akira
Aoki, Makoto
Sato, Daisuke
Otani, Tetsuya
Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases
title Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases
title_full Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases
title_fullStr Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases
title_full_unstemmed Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases
title_short Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases
title_sort perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00743-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shioiikuma perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases
AT yokoyamanaoyuki perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases
AT hiraimotoharu perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases
AT komatsumasaru perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases
AT kubotaakira perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases
AT aokimakoto perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases
AT satodaisuke perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases
AT otanitetsuya perforationofanastomoticpepticulcerfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyareportofthreecases