Cargando…

Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma

BACKGROUND: Based on its high resolution in soft tissue, MRI, especially diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is increasingly important in the evaluation of cholesteatoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo (TGSE) diffusion-weighted (DW) pulse seq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheng, Yaru, Hong, Rujian, Sha, Yan, Zhang, Zhongshuai, Zhou, Kun, Fu, Caixia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00438-7
_version_ 1783523752499216384
author Sheng, Yaru
Hong, Rujian
Sha, Yan
Zhang, Zhongshuai
Zhou, Kun
Fu, Caixia
author_facet Sheng, Yaru
Hong, Rujian
Sha, Yan
Zhang, Zhongshuai
Zhou, Kun
Fu, Caixia
author_sort Sheng, Yaru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on its high resolution in soft tissue, MRI, especially diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is increasingly important in the evaluation of cholesteatoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo (TGSE) diffusion-weighted (DW) pulse sequence with the BLADE trajectory technique in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at 3 T and to qualitatively and quantitatively compare image quality between the TGSE BLADE and RESOLVE methods. METHOD: A total of 42 patients (23 males, 19 females; age range, 7–65 years; mean, 40.1 years) with surgically confirmed cholesteatoma in the middle ear were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent DWI (both a prototype TGSE BLADE DWI sequence and the RESOLVE DWI sequence) using a 3-T scanner with a 64-channel brain coil. Qualitative imaging parameters (imaging sharpness, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, and overall imaging quality) and quantitative imaging parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were assessed for the two diffusion acquisition techniques by two independent radiologists. RESULT: A comparison of qualitative scores indicated that TGSE BLADE DWI produced less geometric distortion, fewer ghosting artifacts (P < 0.001) and higher image quality (P < 0.001) than were observed for RESOLVE DWI. A comparison of the evaluated quantitative image parameters between TGSE and RESOLVE showed that TGSE BLADE DWI produced a significantly lower SNR (P < 0.001) and higher parameter values (both contrast and CNR (P < 0.001)) than were found for RESOLVE DWI. The ADC (P < 0.001) was significantly lower for TGSE BLADE DWI (0.763 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s) than RESOLVE DWI (0.928 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s). CONCLUSION: Compared with RESOLVE DWI, TGSE BLADE DWI significantly improved the image quality of cholesteatoma by reducing magnetic sensitive artifacts, distortion, and blurring. TGSE BLADE DWI is more valuable than RESOLVE DWI for the diagnosis of small-sized (2 mm) cholesteatoma lesions. However, TGSE BLADE DWI also has some disadvantages: the whole image intensity is slightly low, so that the anatomical details of the air-bone interface are not shown well, and this shortcoming should be improved in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7168963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71689632020-04-23 Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma Sheng, Yaru Hong, Rujian Sha, Yan Zhang, Zhongshuai Zhou, Kun Fu, Caixia BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Based on its high resolution in soft tissue, MRI, especially diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is increasingly important in the evaluation of cholesteatoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo (TGSE) diffusion-weighted (DW) pulse sequence with the BLADE trajectory technique in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at 3 T and to qualitatively and quantitatively compare image quality between the TGSE BLADE and RESOLVE methods. METHOD: A total of 42 patients (23 males, 19 females; age range, 7–65 years; mean, 40.1 years) with surgically confirmed cholesteatoma in the middle ear were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent DWI (both a prototype TGSE BLADE DWI sequence and the RESOLVE DWI sequence) using a 3-T scanner with a 64-channel brain coil. Qualitative imaging parameters (imaging sharpness, geometric distortion, ghosting artifacts, and overall imaging quality) and quantitative imaging parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were assessed for the two diffusion acquisition techniques by two independent radiologists. RESULT: A comparison of qualitative scores indicated that TGSE BLADE DWI produced less geometric distortion, fewer ghosting artifacts (P < 0.001) and higher image quality (P < 0.001) than were observed for RESOLVE DWI. A comparison of the evaluated quantitative image parameters between TGSE and RESOLVE showed that TGSE BLADE DWI produced a significantly lower SNR (P < 0.001) and higher parameter values (both contrast and CNR (P < 0.001)) than were found for RESOLVE DWI. The ADC (P < 0.001) was significantly lower for TGSE BLADE DWI (0.763 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s) than RESOLVE DWI (0.928 × 10(− 3) mm(2)/s). CONCLUSION: Compared with RESOLVE DWI, TGSE BLADE DWI significantly improved the image quality of cholesteatoma by reducing magnetic sensitive artifacts, distortion, and blurring. TGSE BLADE DWI is more valuable than RESOLVE DWI for the diagnosis of small-sized (2 mm) cholesteatoma lesions. However, TGSE BLADE DWI also has some disadvantages: the whole image intensity is slightly low, so that the anatomical details of the air-bone interface are not shown well, and this shortcoming should be improved in the future. BioMed Central 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7168963/ /pubmed/32306913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00438-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sheng, Yaru
Hong, Rujian
Sha, Yan
Zhang, Zhongshuai
Zhou, Kun
Fu, Caixia
Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_full Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_fullStr Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_full_unstemmed Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_short Performance of TGSE BLADE DWI compared with RESOLVE DWI in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_sort performance of tgse blade dwi compared with resolve dwi in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00438-7
work_keys_str_mv AT shengyaru performanceoftgsebladedwicomparedwithresolvedwiinthediagnosisofcholesteatoma
AT hongrujian performanceoftgsebladedwicomparedwithresolvedwiinthediagnosisofcholesteatoma
AT shayan performanceoftgsebladedwicomparedwithresolvedwiinthediagnosisofcholesteatoma
AT zhangzhongshuai performanceoftgsebladedwicomparedwithresolvedwiinthediagnosisofcholesteatoma
AT zhoukun performanceoftgsebladedwicomparedwithresolvedwiinthediagnosisofcholesteatoma
AT fucaixia performanceoftgsebladedwicomparedwithresolvedwiinthediagnosisofcholesteatoma