Cargando…

Evaluation of growth hormone co-treatment in in vitro fertilization in patients responding better to the GnRH antagonist short protocol

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims at evaluating the results obtained after in vitro fertilization in bad responders, using controlled ovarian hyperstimulation together with the use of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (cetrorelix acetate) in a short protocol. METHODS: This is an anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Macedo, José Fernando, Oliveira, Maristela Rodrigues, Gomes, Luiz Mauro Oliveira, de Macedo, Gustavo Capinzaiki, de Macedo, Giovanna Capinzaiki, Gomes, Daniela Oliveira, Martins, Olga Goiana, Ambrogi, Bruna Oliveira, dos Santos, Sandra Irene Sprogis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7169923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155012
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190083
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The present study aims at evaluating the results obtained after in vitro fertilization in bad responders, using controlled ovarian hyperstimulation together with the use of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (cetrorelix acetate) in a short protocol. METHODS: This is an analytical, longitudinal, retrospective and controlled study involving patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures in the assisted reproduction program of the Reproferty clinic, in the municipality of São José dos Campos/SP, from January 2012 to December 2016. We collected the data obtained from the medical records of patients considered to have undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix acetate) and Growth Hormone (GH) in a short cycle protocol. The patients considered controls were those submitted to the same hyperstimulation process, without using GH. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the following analyzed parameters: gonadotrophin regimen dose, stimulation duration, and estradiol levels on the day of HCG administration, number of follicles, number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature oocytes and number of good-quality embryos. On the other hand, the GH administration was not significant in the number of cycles that achieved transfer, the number of embryos transferred and the number of frozen cycles. In the case group, there was no increase in the number of cycles that reached pregnancy rate βhCG+; however, the clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were significant. CONCLUSION: The present investigation demonstrated that GH administration as a supplement in poor responders improves the majority of the parameters to achieve a full term pregnancy in these patients.