Cargando…

RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models

BACKGROUND: Genetic factors significantly affect alcohol consumption and vulnerability to withdrawal. Furthermore, some genetic models showing predisposition to severe withdrawal are also predisposed to low ethanol (EtOH) consumption and vice versa, even when tested independently in naïve animals. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozell, Laura B., Lockwood, Denesa, Darakjian, Priscila, Edmunds, Stephanie, Shepherdson, Karen, Buck, Kari J., Hitzemann, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7169974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.14312
_version_ 1783523826928189440
author Kozell, Laura B.
Lockwood, Denesa
Darakjian, Priscila
Edmunds, Stephanie
Shepherdson, Karen
Buck, Kari J.
Hitzemann, Robert
author_facet Kozell, Laura B.
Lockwood, Denesa
Darakjian, Priscila
Edmunds, Stephanie
Shepherdson, Karen
Buck, Kari J.
Hitzemann, Robert
author_sort Kozell, Laura B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetic factors significantly affect alcohol consumption and vulnerability to withdrawal. Furthermore, some genetic models showing predisposition to severe withdrawal are also predisposed to low ethanol (EtOH) consumption and vice versa, even when tested independently in naïve animals. METHODS: Beginning with a C57BL/6J × DBA/2J F2 intercross founder population, animals were simultaneously selectively bred for both high alcohol consumption and low acute withdrawal (SOT line), or vice versa (NOT line). Using randomly chosen fourth selected generation (S4) mice (N = 18‐22/sex/line), RNA‐Seq was employed to assess genome‐wide gene expression in ventral striatum. The MegaMUGA array was used to detect genome‐wide genotypic differences. Differential gene expression and the weighted gene co‐expression network analysis were implemented as described elsewhere (Genes Brain Behav 16, 2017, 462). RESULTS: The new selection of the SOT and NOT lines was similar to that reported previously (Alcohol Clin Exp Res 38, 2014, 2915). One thousand eight hundred and sixteen transcripts were detected as differentially expressed between the lines. For genes more highly expressed in the SOT line, there was enrichment in genes associated with cell adhesion, synapse organization, and postsynaptic membrane. The genes with a cell adhesion annotation included 23 protocadherins, Mpdz and Dlg2. Genes with a postsynaptic membrane annotation included Gabrb3, Gphn, Grid1, Grin2b, Grin2c, and Grm3. The genes more highly expressed in the NOT line were enriched in a network module (red) with annotations associated with mitochondrial function. Several of these genes were module hub nodes, and these included Nedd8, Guk1, Elof1, Ndufa8, and Atp6v1f. CONCLUSIONS: Marked effects of selection on gene expression were detected. The NOT line was characterized by higher expression of hub nodes associated with mitochondrial function. Genes more highly expressed in the SOT aligned with previous findings, for example, Colville and colleagues (Genes Brain Behav 16, 2017, 462) that both high EtOH preference and consumption are associated with effects on cell adhesion and glutamate synaptic plasticity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7169974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71699742020-05-13 RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models Kozell, Laura B. Lockwood, Denesa Darakjian, Priscila Edmunds, Stephanie Shepherdson, Karen Buck, Kari J. Hitzemann, Robert Alcohol Clin Exp Res Human and Animal Genetics BACKGROUND: Genetic factors significantly affect alcohol consumption and vulnerability to withdrawal. Furthermore, some genetic models showing predisposition to severe withdrawal are also predisposed to low ethanol (EtOH) consumption and vice versa, even when tested independently in naïve animals. METHODS: Beginning with a C57BL/6J × DBA/2J F2 intercross founder population, animals were simultaneously selectively bred for both high alcohol consumption and low acute withdrawal (SOT line), or vice versa (NOT line). Using randomly chosen fourth selected generation (S4) mice (N = 18‐22/sex/line), RNA‐Seq was employed to assess genome‐wide gene expression in ventral striatum. The MegaMUGA array was used to detect genome‐wide genotypic differences. Differential gene expression and the weighted gene co‐expression network analysis were implemented as described elsewhere (Genes Brain Behav 16, 2017, 462). RESULTS: The new selection of the SOT and NOT lines was similar to that reported previously (Alcohol Clin Exp Res 38, 2014, 2915). One thousand eight hundred and sixteen transcripts were detected as differentially expressed between the lines. For genes more highly expressed in the SOT line, there was enrichment in genes associated with cell adhesion, synapse organization, and postsynaptic membrane. The genes with a cell adhesion annotation included 23 protocadherins, Mpdz and Dlg2. Genes with a postsynaptic membrane annotation included Gabrb3, Gphn, Grid1, Grin2b, Grin2c, and Grm3. The genes more highly expressed in the NOT line were enriched in a network module (red) with annotations associated with mitochondrial function. Several of these genes were module hub nodes, and these included Nedd8, Guk1, Elof1, Ndufa8, and Atp6v1f. CONCLUSIONS: Marked effects of selection on gene expression were detected. The NOT line was characterized by higher expression of hub nodes associated with mitochondrial function. Genes more highly expressed in the SOT aligned with previous findings, for example, Colville and colleagues (Genes Brain Behav 16, 2017, 462) that both high EtOH preference and consumption are associated with effects on cell adhesion and glutamate synaptic plasticity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-16 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7169974/ /pubmed/32090358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.14312 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Research Society on Alcoholism This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Human and Animal Genetics
Kozell, Laura B.
Lockwood, Denesa
Darakjian, Priscila
Edmunds, Stephanie
Shepherdson, Karen
Buck, Kari J.
Hitzemann, Robert
RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models
title RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models
title_full RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models
title_fullStr RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models
title_full_unstemmed RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models
title_short RNA‐Seq Analysis of Genetic and Transcriptome Network Effects of Dual‐Trait Selection for Ethanol Preference and Withdrawal Using SOT and NOT Genetic Models
title_sort rna‐seq analysis of genetic and transcriptome network effects of dual‐trait selection for ethanol preference and withdrawal using sot and not genetic models
topic Human and Animal Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7169974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.14312
work_keys_str_mv AT kozelllaurab rnaseqanalysisofgeneticandtranscriptomenetworkeffectsofdualtraitselectionforethanolpreferenceandwithdrawalusingsotandnotgeneticmodels
AT lockwooddenesa rnaseqanalysisofgeneticandtranscriptomenetworkeffectsofdualtraitselectionforethanolpreferenceandwithdrawalusingsotandnotgeneticmodels
AT darakjianpriscila rnaseqanalysisofgeneticandtranscriptomenetworkeffectsofdualtraitselectionforethanolpreferenceandwithdrawalusingsotandnotgeneticmodels
AT edmundsstephanie rnaseqanalysisofgeneticandtranscriptomenetworkeffectsofdualtraitselectionforethanolpreferenceandwithdrawalusingsotandnotgeneticmodels
AT shepherdsonkaren rnaseqanalysisofgeneticandtranscriptomenetworkeffectsofdualtraitselectionforethanolpreferenceandwithdrawalusingsotandnotgeneticmodels
AT buckkarij rnaseqanalysisofgeneticandtranscriptomenetworkeffectsofdualtraitselectionforethanolpreferenceandwithdrawalusingsotandnotgeneticmodels
AT hitzemannrobert rnaseqanalysisofgeneticandtranscriptomenetworkeffectsofdualtraitselectionforethanolpreferenceandwithdrawalusingsotandnotgeneticmodels