Cargando…

Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE: To develop a novel biological dosimetric margin (BDM) and to create a biological conversion factor (BCF) that compensates for the difference between physical dosimetric margin (PDM) and BDM, which provides a novel scheme of a direct estimation of the BDM from the physical dose (PD) distribu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawahara, Daisuke, Saito, Akito, Ozawa, Shuichi, Shiinoki, Takehiro, Kimura, Tomoki, Tsubouchi, Kento, Nagata, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7170295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32141684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12843
_version_ 1783523865590235136
author Kawahara, Daisuke
Saito, Akito
Ozawa, Shuichi
Shiinoki, Takehiro
Kimura, Tomoki
Tsubouchi, Kento
Nagata, Yasushi
author_facet Kawahara, Daisuke
Saito, Akito
Ozawa, Shuichi
Shiinoki, Takehiro
Kimura, Tomoki
Tsubouchi, Kento
Nagata, Yasushi
author_sort Kawahara, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a novel biological dosimetric margin (BDM) and to create a biological conversion factor (BCF) that compensates for the difference between physical dosimetric margin (PDM) and BDM, which provides a novel scheme of a direct estimation of the BDM from the physical dose (PD) distribution. METHODS: The offset to isocenter was applied in 1‐mm steps along left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), and cranio‐caudal (CC) directions for 10 treatment plans of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a prescribed dose of 48 Gy. These plans were recalculated to biological equivalent dose (BED) by the linear‐quadratic model for the dose per fraction (DPF) of d = 3–20 Gy/fr and [Formula: see text]. BDM and PDM were defined so that the region that satisfied that the dose covering 95% (or 98%) of the clinical target volume was greater than or equal to the 90% of the prescribed PD and BED, respectively. An empirical formula of the BCF was created as a function of the DPF. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LR and AP directions for neither the PDM nor BDM. On the other hand, BDM and PDM in the CC direction were significantly larger than in the other directions. BCFs of D (95%) and D (98%) were derived for the transverse (LR and AP) and longitudinal (CC) directions. CONCLUSIONS: A novel scheme to directly estimate the BDM using the BCF was developed. This technique is expected to enable the BED‐based SBRT treatment planning using PD‐based treatment planning systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7170295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71702952020-04-21 Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy Kawahara, Daisuke Saito, Akito Ozawa, Shuichi Shiinoki, Takehiro Kimura, Tomoki Tsubouchi, Kento Nagata, Yasushi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To develop a novel biological dosimetric margin (BDM) and to create a biological conversion factor (BCF) that compensates for the difference between physical dosimetric margin (PDM) and BDM, which provides a novel scheme of a direct estimation of the BDM from the physical dose (PD) distribution. METHODS: The offset to isocenter was applied in 1‐mm steps along left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), and cranio‐caudal (CC) directions for 10 treatment plans of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a prescribed dose of 48 Gy. These plans were recalculated to biological equivalent dose (BED) by the linear‐quadratic model for the dose per fraction (DPF) of d = 3–20 Gy/fr and [Formula: see text]. BDM and PDM were defined so that the region that satisfied that the dose covering 95% (or 98%) of the clinical target volume was greater than or equal to the 90% of the prescribed PD and BED, respectively. An empirical formula of the BCF was created as a function of the DPF. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LR and AP directions for neither the PDM nor BDM. On the other hand, BDM and PDM in the CC direction were significantly larger than in the other directions. BCFs of D (95%) and D (98%) were derived for the transverse (LR and AP) and longitudinal (CC) directions. CONCLUSIONS: A novel scheme to directly estimate the BDM using the BCF was developed. This technique is expected to enable the BED‐based SBRT treatment planning using PD‐based treatment planning systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7170295/ /pubmed/32141684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12843 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Kawahara, Daisuke
Saito, Akito
Ozawa, Shuichi
Shiinoki, Takehiro
Kimura, Tomoki
Tsubouchi, Kento
Nagata, Yasushi
Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
title Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_full Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_fullStr Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_short Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
title_sort assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7170295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32141684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12843
work_keys_str_mv AT kawaharadaisuke assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT saitoakito assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT ozawashuichi assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT shiinokitakehiro assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT kimuratomoki assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT tsubouchikento assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT nagatayasushi assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy