Cargando…
Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy
PURPOSE: To develop a novel biological dosimetric margin (BDM) and to create a biological conversion factor (BCF) that compensates for the difference between physical dosimetric margin (PDM) and BDM, which provides a novel scheme of a direct estimation of the BDM from the physical dose (PD) distribu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7170295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32141684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12843 |
_version_ | 1783523865590235136 |
---|---|
author | Kawahara, Daisuke Saito, Akito Ozawa, Shuichi Shiinoki, Takehiro Kimura, Tomoki Tsubouchi, Kento Nagata, Yasushi |
author_facet | Kawahara, Daisuke Saito, Akito Ozawa, Shuichi Shiinoki, Takehiro Kimura, Tomoki Tsubouchi, Kento Nagata, Yasushi |
author_sort | Kawahara, Daisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a novel biological dosimetric margin (BDM) and to create a biological conversion factor (BCF) that compensates for the difference between physical dosimetric margin (PDM) and BDM, which provides a novel scheme of a direct estimation of the BDM from the physical dose (PD) distribution. METHODS: The offset to isocenter was applied in 1‐mm steps along left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), and cranio‐caudal (CC) directions for 10 treatment plans of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a prescribed dose of 48 Gy. These plans were recalculated to biological equivalent dose (BED) by the linear‐quadratic model for the dose per fraction (DPF) of d = 3–20 Gy/fr and [Formula: see text]. BDM and PDM were defined so that the region that satisfied that the dose covering 95% (or 98%) of the clinical target volume was greater than or equal to the 90% of the prescribed PD and BED, respectively. An empirical formula of the BCF was created as a function of the DPF. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LR and AP directions for neither the PDM nor BDM. On the other hand, BDM and PDM in the CC direction were significantly larger than in the other directions. BCFs of D (95%) and D (98%) were derived for the transverse (LR and AP) and longitudinal (CC) directions. CONCLUSIONS: A novel scheme to directly estimate the BDM using the BCF was developed. This technique is expected to enable the BED‐based SBRT treatment planning using PD‐based treatment planning systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7170295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71702952020-04-21 Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy Kawahara, Daisuke Saito, Akito Ozawa, Shuichi Shiinoki, Takehiro Kimura, Tomoki Tsubouchi, Kento Nagata, Yasushi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To develop a novel biological dosimetric margin (BDM) and to create a biological conversion factor (BCF) that compensates for the difference between physical dosimetric margin (PDM) and BDM, which provides a novel scheme of a direct estimation of the BDM from the physical dose (PD) distribution. METHODS: The offset to isocenter was applied in 1‐mm steps along left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), and cranio‐caudal (CC) directions for 10 treatment plans of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a prescribed dose of 48 Gy. These plans were recalculated to biological equivalent dose (BED) by the linear‐quadratic model for the dose per fraction (DPF) of d = 3–20 Gy/fr and [Formula: see text]. BDM and PDM were defined so that the region that satisfied that the dose covering 95% (or 98%) of the clinical target volume was greater than or equal to the 90% of the prescribed PD and BED, respectively. An empirical formula of the BCF was created as a function of the DPF. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LR and AP directions for neither the PDM nor BDM. On the other hand, BDM and PDM in the CC direction were significantly larger than in the other directions. BCFs of D (95%) and D (98%) were derived for the transverse (LR and AP) and longitudinal (CC) directions. CONCLUSIONS: A novel scheme to directly estimate the BDM using the BCF was developed. This technique is expected to enable the BED‐based SBRT treatment planning using PD‐based treatment planning systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7170295/ /pubmed/32141684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12843 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Kawahara, Daisuke Saito, Akito Ozawa, Shuichi Shiinoki, Takehiro Kimura, Tomoki Tsubouchi, Kento Nagata, Yasushi Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title | Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_full | Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_short | Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_sort | assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7170295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32141684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawaharadaisuke assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT saitoakito assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT ozawashuichi assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT shiinokitakehiro assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT kimuratomoki assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT tsubouchikento assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT nagatayasushi assessmentofbiologicaldosimetricmarginforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy |