Cargando…

The impact of gender equity in agriculture on nutritional status, diets, and household food security: a mixed-methods systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Undernutrition rates remain high in rural, low-income settings, where large, gender-based inequities persist. We hypothesised that increasing gender equity in agriculture could improve nutrition. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to assess the associations between gender-based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris-Fry, Helen, Nur, Hayaan, Shankar, Bhavani, Zanello, Giacomo, Srinivasan, Chittur, Kadiyala, Suneetha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7170429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002173
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Undernutrition rates remain high in rural, low-income settings, where large, gender-based inequities persist. We hypothesised that increasing gender equity in agriculture could improve nutrition. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to assess the associations between gender-based inequities (in income, land, livestock, and workloads) and nutrition, diets and food security outcomes in agricultural contexts of low-income and middle-income countries. Between 9 March and 7 August 2018, we searched 18 databases and 14 journals, and contacted 27 experts. We included quantitative and qualitative literature from agricultural contexts in low-income and middle-income countries, with no date restriction. Outcomes were women’s and children’s anthropometric status, dietary quality and household food security. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. RESULTS: We identified 19 820 records, of which 34 studies (42 809 households) met the inclusion criteria. Most (22/25) quantitative studies had a high risk of bias, and qualitative evidence was of mixed quality. Income, land and livestock equity had heterogeneous associations with household food security and child anthropometric outcomes. Meta-analyses showed women’s share of household income earned (0.32, 95% CI −4.22 to 4.86; six results) and women’s share of land owned (2.72, 95% CI -0.52 to 5.96; three results) did not increase the percentage of household budget spent on food. Higher-quality studies showed more consistently positive associations between income equity and food security. Evidence is limited on other exposure–outcome pairings. CONCLUSIONS: We find heterogeneous associations between gender equity and household-level food security. High-quality research is needed to establish the impact of gender equity on nutrition outcomes across contexts. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018093987.