Cargando…
A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
BACKGROUND: Despite having chronic gastritis, most people infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are asymptomatic and have no specific clinical signs and symptoms. H. pylori infection can be diagnosed by several detection methods. Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (CLO test) are the most perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23110 |
_version_ | 1783524048001564672 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Chi‐Chen Chen, Chung‐Hsing Chou, Chi Kao, Ting‐Yu Cheng, An Ning Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen Kuo, Cheng‐Liang |
author_facet | Fan, Chi‐Chen Chen, Chung‐Hsing Chou, Chi Kao, Ting‐Yu Cheng, An Ning Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen Kuo, Cheng‐Liang |
author_sort | Fan, Chi‐Chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite having chronic gastritis, most people infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are asymptomatic and have no specific clinical signs and symptoms. H. pylori infection can be diagnosed by several detection methods. Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (CLO test) are the most performed tests of H. pylori infection at first‐line clinical examination because of their simplicity and reliability. However, the sensitivity of CLO test is significantly reduced in patients with atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, and the weaknesses of Giemsa stain are higher cost and time‐consuming. METHODS: The Giemsa stain was modified in several staining solutions and procedures based on the simplified Giemsa technique described by Gray, Wyatt, & Rathbone (1986). The modified Giemsa stain is examined its efficacy and compared with the CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. RESULTS: The modified Giemsa stain is comparable to the traditional one. Statistical analysis indicated that the modified Giemsa stain obtains greater accuracy in H. pylori‐infected patients with gastritis and ulcer than the CLO test (48.1% vs. 43.7%). Moreover, considering the prognosis of different symptoms of gastric diseases, the modified Giemsa stain has a more accurate prognosis than combination symptoms (P = 1.8E‐05 vs. P = 5.49E‐05). The modified Giemsa stain is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Giemsa stain is more simplified and time‐saving than traditional Giemsa stain, which is comparable to the traditional one and is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. In clinical examination, this modified Giemsa stain can be applied to routine examination and provides quick and accurate diagnosis and prognosis to H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7171334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71713342020-04-21 A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test Fan, Chi‐Chen Chen, Chung‐Hsing Chou, Chi Kao, Ting‐Yu Cheng, An Ning Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen Kuo, Cheng‐Liang J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Despite having chronic gastritis, most people infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are asymptomatic and have no specific clinical signs and symptoms. H. pylori infection can be diagnosed by several detection methods. Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (CLO test) are the most performed tests of H. pylori infection at first‐line clinical examination because of their simplicity and reliability. However, the sensitivity of CLO test is significantly reduced in patients with atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, and the weaknesses of Giemsa stain are higher cost and time‐consuming. METHODS: The Giemsa stain was modified in several staining solutions and procedures based on the simplified Giemsa technique described by Gray, Wyatt, & Rathbone (1986). The modified Giemsa stain is examined its efficacy and compared with the CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. RESULTS: The modified Giemsa stain is comparable to the traditional one. Statistical analysis indicated that the modified Giemsa stain obtains greater accuracy in H. pylori‐infected patients with gastritis and ulcer than the CLO test (48.1% vs. 43.7%). Moreover, considering the prognosis of different symptoms of gastric diseases, the modified Giemsa stain has a more accurate prognosis than combination symptoms (P = 1.8E‐05 vs. P = 5.49E‐05). The modified Giemsa stain is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Giemsa stain is more simplified and time‐saving than traditional Giemsa stain, which is comparable to the traditional one and is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. In clinical examination, this modified Giemsa stain can be applied to routine examination and provides quick and accurate diagnosis and prognosis to H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric diseases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7171334/ /pubmed/31733007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23110 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Fan, Chi‐Chen Chen, Chung‐Hsing Chou, Chi Kao, Ting‐Yu Cheng, An Ning Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen Kuo, Cheng‐Liang A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test |
title | A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test |
title_full | A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test |
title_fullStr | A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test |
title_full_unstemmed | A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test |
title_short | A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test |
title_sort | time‐saving–modified giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanchichen atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT chenchunghsing atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT chouchi atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT kaotingyu atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT chenganning atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT leealanyuehluen atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT kuochengliang atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT fanchichen timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT chenchunghsing timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT chouchi timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT kaotingyu timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT chenganning timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT leealanyuehluen timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest AT kuochengliang timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest |