Cargando…

A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test

BACKGROUND: Despite having chronic gastritis, most people infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are asymptomatic and have no specific clinical signs and symptoms. H. pylori infection can be diagnosed by several detection methods. Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (CLO test) are the most perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Chi‐Chen, Chen, Chung‐Hsing, Chou, Chi, Kao, Ting‐Yu, Cheng, An Ning, Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen, Kuo, Cheng‐Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23110
_version_ 1783524048001564672
author Fan, Chi‐Chen
Chen, Chung‐Hsing
Chou, Chi
Kao, Ting‐Yu
Cheng, An Ning
Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen
Kuo, Cheng‐Liang
author_facet Fan, Chi‐Chen
Chen, Chung‐Hsing
Chou, Chi
Kao, Ting‐Yu
Cheng, An Ning
Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen
Kuo, Cheng‐Liang
author_sort Fan, Chi‐Chen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite having chronic gastritis, most people infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are asymptomatic and have no specific clinical signs and symptoms. H. pylori infection can be diagnosed by several detection methods. Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (CLO test) are the most performed tests of H. pylori infection at first‐line clinical examination because of their simplicity and reliability. However, the sensitivity of CLO test is significantly reduced in patients with atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, and the weaknesses of Giemsa stain are higher cost and time‐consuming. METHODS: The Giemsa stain was modified in several staining solutions and procedures based on the simplified Giemsa technique described by Gray, Wyatt, & Rathbone (1986). The modified Giemsa stain is examined its efficacy and compared with the CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. RESULTS: The modified Giemsa stain is comparable to the traditional one. Statistical analysis indicated that the modified Giemsa stain obtains greater accuracy in H. pylori‐infected patients with gastritis and ulcer than the CLO test (48.1% vs. 43.7%). Moreover, considering the prognosis of different symptoms of gastric diseases, the modified Giemsa stain has a more accurate prognosis than combination symptoms (P = 1.8E‐05 vs. P = 5.49E‐05). The modified Giemsa stain is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Giemsa stain is more simplified and time‐saving than traditional Giemsa stain, which is comparable to the traditional one and is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. In clinical examination, this modified Giemsa stain can be applied to routine examination and provides quick and accurate diagnosis and prognosis to H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7171334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71713342020-04-21 A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test Fan, Chi‐Chen Chen, Chung‐Hsing Chou, Chi Kao, Ting‐Yu Cheng, An Ning Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen Kuo, Cheng‐Liang J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Despite having chronic gastritis, most people infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are asymptomatic and have no specific clinical signs and symptoms. H. pylori infection can be diagnosed by several detection methods. Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (CLO test) are the most performed tests of H. pylori infection at first‐line clinical examination because of their simplicity and reliability. However, the sensitivity of CLO test is significantly reduced in patients with atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, and the weaknesses of Giemsa stain are higher cost and time‐consuming. METHODS: The Giemsa stain was modified in several staining solutions and procedures based on the simplified Giemsa technique described by Gray, Wyatt, & Rathbone (1986). The modified Giemsa stain is examined its efficacy and compared with the CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. RESULTS: The modified Giemsa stain is comparable to the traditional one. Statistical analysis indicated that the modified Giemsa stain obtains greater accuracy in H. pylori‐infected patients with gastritis and ulcer than the CLO test (48.1% vs. 43.7%). Moreover, considering the prognosis of different symptoms of gastric diseases, the modified Giemsa stain has a more accurate prognosis than combination symptoms (P = 1.8E‐05 vs. P = 5.49E‐05). The modified Giemsa stain is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Giemsa stain is more simplified and time‐saving than traditional Giemsa stain, which is comparable to the traditional one and is confirmed to be better than CLO test using 233 H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric disease. In clinical examination, this modified Giemsa stain can be applied to routine examination and provides quick and accurate diagnosis and prognosis to H. pylori‐infected patients with gastric diseases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7171334/ /pubmed/31733007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23110 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Fan, Chi‐Chen
Chen, Chung‐Hsing
Chou, Chi
Kao, Ting‐Yu
Cheng, An Ning
Lee, Alan Yueh‐Luen
Kuo, Cheng‐Liang
A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
title A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
title_full A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
title_fullStr A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
title_full_unstemmed A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
title_short A time‐saving–modified Giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
title_sort time‐saving–modified giemsa stain is a better diagnostic method of helicobacter pylori infection compared with the rapid urease test
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23110
work_keys_str_mv AT fanchichen atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT chenchunghsing atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT chouchi atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT kaotingyu atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT chenganning atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT leealanyuehluen atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT kuochengliang atimesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT fanchichen timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT chenchunghsing timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT chouchi timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT kaotingyu timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT chenganning timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT leealanyuehluen timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest
AT kuochengliang timesavingmodifiedgiemsastainisabetterdiagnosticmethodofhelicobacterpyloriinfectioncomparedwiththerapidureasetest