Cargando…

Chromosomal microarray analysis for pregnancies with or without ultrasound abnormalities in women of advanced maternal age

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been suggested to be routinely conducted for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities (UA), especially with ultrasound structural anomalies (USA). Whether to routinely offer CMA to women of advanced maternal age (AMA) without UA when undergoing inva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xiaoqing, An, Gang, Xie, Xiaorui, Su, Linjuan, Cai, Meiying, Chen, Xuemei, Li, Ying, Lin, Na, He, Deqin, Wang, Meiying, Huang, Hailong, Xu, Liangpu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23117
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has been suggested to be routinely conducted for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities (UA), especially with ultrasound structural anomalies (USA). Whether to routinely offer CMA to women of advanced maternal age (AMA) without UA when undergoing invasive prenatal testing is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of CMA in detecting clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses, with or without UA, of women with AMA. METHODS: Data from singleton pregnancies referred for prenatal CMA due to AMA, with or without UA were obtained. The enrolled cases were divided into AMA group (group A) and AMA accompanied by UA group (group B). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology and conventional karyotyping were performed simultaneously. RESULTS: A total of 703 cases were enrolled and divided into group A (N = 437) and group B (N = 266). Clinically significant abnormalities were detected by CMA in 52 cases (7.4%, 52/703; the value in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (3.9% vs 13.2%, P < .05); no statistic difference was observed with respect to submicroscopic variants of clinical significance between the two groups (0.9% vs 2.6%, P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Chromosomal microarray analysis should be available to all women with AMA undergoing invasive prenatal testing, regardless of ultrasound findings.