Cargando…

Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?

Excessive emotional responses to stressful events can detrimentally affect psychological functioning and mental health. Recent studies have provided evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) can affect the regulation of stress-related emotional response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smits, Fenne M, Schutter, Dennis J L G, van Honk, Jack, Geuze, Elbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa011
_version_ 1783524058130808832
author Smits, Fenne M
Schutter, Dennis J L G
van Honk, Jack
Geuze, Elbert
author_facet Smits, Fenne M
Schutter, Dennis J L G
van Honk, Jack
Geuze, Elbert
author_sort Smits, Fenne M
collection PubMed
description Excessive emotional responses to stressful events can detrimentally affect psychological functioning and mental health. Recent studies have provided evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) can affect the regulation of stress-related emotional responses. However, the reliability and effect sizes have not been systematically analyzed. In the present study, we reviewed and meta-analyzed the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the PFC on acute emotional stress reactivity in healthy individuals. Forty sham-controlled single-session rTMS and tDCS studies were included. Separate random effects models were performed to estimate the mean effect sizes of emotional reactivity. Twelve rTMS studies together showed no evidence that rTMS over the PFC influenced emotional reactivity. Twenty-six anodal tDCS studies yielded a weak beneficial effect on stress-related emotional reactivity (Hedges’ g = −0.16, CI(95%) = [−0.33, 0.00]). These findings suggest that a single session of NBS is insufficient to induce reliable, clinically significant effects but also provide preliminary evidence that specific NBS methods can affect emotional reactivity. This may motivate further research into augmenting the efficacy of NBS protocols on stress-related processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7171378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71713782020-04-24 Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? Smits, Fenne M Schutter, Dennis J L G van Honk, Jack Geuze, Elbert Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Excessive emotional responses to stressful events can detrimentally affect psychological functioning and mental health. Recent studies have provided evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) can affect the regulation of stress-related emotional responses. However, the reliability and effect sizes have not been systematically analyzed. In the present study, we reviewed and meta-analyzed the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the PFC on acute emotional stress reactivity in healthy individuals. Forty sham-controlled single-session rTMS and tDCS studies were included. Separate random effects models were performed to estimate the mean effect sizes of emotional reactivity. Twelve rTMS studies together showed no evidence that rTMS over the PFC influenced emotional reactivity. Twenty-six anodal tDCS studies yielded a weak beneficial effect on stress-related emotional reactivity (Hedges’ g = −0.16, CI(95%) = [−0.33, 0.00]). These findings suggest that a single session of NBS is insufficient to induce reliable, clinically significant effects but also provide preliminary evidence that specific NBS methods can affect emotional reactivity. This may motivate further research into augmenting the efficacy of NBS protocols on stress-related processes. Oxford University Press 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7171378/ /pubmed/31993648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa011 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Smits, Fenne M
Schutter, Dennis J L G
van Honk, Jack
Geuze, Elbert
Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
title Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
title_full Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
title_fullStr Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
title_full_unstemmed Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
title_short Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
title_sort does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa011
work_keys_str_mv AT smitsfennem doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity
AT schutterdennisjlg doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity
AT vanhonkjack doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity
AT geuzeelbert doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity