Cargando…
Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?
Excessive emotional responses to stressful events can detrimentally affect psychological functioning and mental health. Recent studies have provided evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) can affect the regulation of stress-related emotional response...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa011 |
_version_ | 1783524058130808832 |
---|---|
author | Smits, Fenne M Schutter, Dennis J L G van Honk, Jack Geuze, Elbert |
author_facet | Smits, Fenne M Schutter, Dennis J L G van Honk, Jack Geuze, Elbert |
author_sort | Smits, Fenne M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Excessive emotional responses to stressful events can detrimentally affect psychological functioning and mental health. Recent studies have provided evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) can affect the regulation of stress-related emotional responses. However, the reliability and effect sizes have not been systematically analyzed. In the present study, we reviewed and meta-analyzed the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the PFC on acute emotional stress reactivity in healthy individuals. Forty sham-controlled single-session rTMS and tDCS studies were included. Separate random effects models were performed to estimate the mean effect sizes of emotional reactivity. Twelve rTMS studies together showed no evidence that rTMS over the PFC influenced emotional reactivity. Twenty-six anodal tDCS studies yielded a weak beneficial effect on stress-related emotional reactivity (Hedges’ g = −0.16, CI(95%) = [−0.33, 0.00]). These findings suggest that a single session of NBS is insufficient to induce reliable, clinically significant effects but also provide preliminary evidence that specific NBS methods can affect emotional reactivity. This may motivate further research into augmenting the efficacy of NBS protocols on stress-related processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7171378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71713782020-04-24 Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? Smits, Fenne M Schutter, Dennis J L G van Honk, Jack Geuze, Elbert Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Excessive emotional responses to stressful events can detrimentally affect psychological functioning and mental health. Recent studies have provided evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) can affect the regulation of stress-related emotional responses. However, the reliability and effect sizes have not been systematically analyzed. In the present study, we reviewed and meta-analyzed the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the PFC on acute emotional stress reactivity in healthy individuals. Forty sham-controlled single-session rTMS and tDCS studies were included. Separate random effects models were performed to estimate the mean effect sizes of emotional reactivity. Twelve rTMS studies together showed no evidence that rTMS over the PFC influenced emotional reactivity. Twenty-six anodal tDCS studies yielded a weak beneficial effect on stress-related emotional reactivity (Hedges’ g = −0.16, CI(95%) = [−0.33, 0.00]). These findings suggest that a single session of NBS is insufficient to induce reliable, clinically significant effects but also provide preliminary evidence that specific NBS methods can affect emotional reactivity. This may motivate further research into augmenting the efficacy of NBS protocols on stress-related processes. Oxford University Press 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7171378/ /pubmed/31993648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa011 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Smits, Fenne M Schutter, Dennis J L G van Honk, Jack Geuze, Elbert Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? |
title | Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? |
title_full | Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? |
title_fullStr | Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? |
title_short | Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? |
title_sort | does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity? |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smitsfennem doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity AT schutterdennisjlg doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity AT vanhonkjack doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity AT geuzeelbert doesnoninvasivebrainstimulationmodulateemotionalstressreactivity |