Cargando…

Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer

Background: Application of (18)F(-)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in urological oncology was relatively slowly due to the urinary elimination of (18)F-FDG. We investigated whether delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for diagnosing renal pelvic cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Yiping, Chen, Ruohua, Wang, Yining, Huang, Gan, Xia, Qian, Liu, Jianjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328179
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.44512
_version_ 1783524080670998528
author Shi, Yiping
Chen, Ruohua
Wang, Yining
Huang, Gan
Xia, Qian
Liu, Jianjun
author_facet Shi, Yiping
Chen, Ruohua
Wang, Yining
Huang, Gan
Xia, Qian
Liu, Jianjun
author_sort Shi, Yiping
collection PubMed
description Background: Application of (18)F(-)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in urological oncology was relatively slowly due to the urinary elimination of (18)F-FDG. We investigated whether delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for diagnosing renal pelvic cancer. Methods: 51 patients were included who underwent delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting renal pelvic space-occupying lesions. The comparations of delayed PET/CT parameters and clinical characteristics between renal pelvic cancer and benign polyp were investigated. Results: Among the 51 patients, 47 were found to have renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma, and 4 had benign polyp. ROC analysis identified the lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 6.2 as the optimal cut-off value to distinguish from renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma to benign polyp. With the SUVmax cut-off of 6.2, the sensitivity, and specificity for predicting of renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma were 91.5% (43/47), and 100% (4/4). We also found a significant difference in tumor size between the positive (SUVmax > 6.2) and negative (SUVmax ≤ 6.2) PET groups in renal pelvic cancers. In patients with tumor size < 1.1 cm, the probability of being in the negative PET group was 75%. In such patients, a substantial proportion of renal pelvic cancer demonstrated negative SUVmax similar to that in patients with benign polyp. Conclusion: Delayed (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for differentiating renal pelvic cancer from benign polyp. In patients with small tumor size, renal pelvic cancer may present low (18)F-FDG uptake, mimicking the metabolic phenotypes of patients with benign polyp.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7171487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71714872020-04-23 Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer Shi, Yiping Chen, Ruohua Wang, Yining Huang, Gan Xia, Qian Liu, Jianjun J Cancer Research Paper Background: Application of (18)F(-)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in urological oncology was relatively slowly due to the urinary elimination of (18)F-FDG. We investigated whether delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for diagnosing renal pelvic cancer. Methods: 51 patients were included who underwent delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting renal pelvic space-occupying lesions. The comparations of delayed PET/CT parameters and clinical characteristics between renal pelvic cancer and benign polyp were investigated. Results: Among the 51 patients, 47 were found to have renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma, and 4 had benign polyp. ROC analysis identified the lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 6.2 as the optimal cut-off value to distinguish from renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma to benign polyp. With the SUVmax cut-off of 6.2, the sensitivity, and specificity for predicting of renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma were 91.5% (43/47), and 100% (4/4). We also found a significant difference in tumor size between the positive (SUVmax > 6.2) and negative (SUVmax ≤ 6.2) PET groups in renal pelvic cancers. In patients with tumor size < 1.1 cm, the probability of being in the negative PET group was 75%. In such patients, a substantial proportion of renal pelvic cancer demonstrated negative SUVmax similar to that in patients with benign polyp. Conclusion: Delayed (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for differentiating renal pelvic cancer from benign polyp. In patients with small tumor size, renal pelvic cancer may present low (18)F-FDG uptake, mimicking the metabolic phenotypes of patients with benign polyp. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7171487/ /pubmed/32328179 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.44512 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Shi, Yiping
Chen, Ruohua
Wang, Yining
Huang, Gan
Xia, Qian
Liu, Jianjun
Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
title Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
title_full Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
title_fullStr Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
title_short Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
title_sort delayed post-diuretic (18)f-fdg pet/ct for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328179
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.44512
work_keys_str_mv AT shiyiping delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer
AT chenruohua delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer
AT wangyining delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer
AT huanggan delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer
AT xiaqian delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer
AT liujianjun delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer