Cargando…
Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer
Background: Application of (18)F(-)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in urological oncology was relatively slowly due to the urinary elimination of (18)F-FDG. We investigated whether delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for diagnosing renal pelvic cancer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328179 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.44512 |
_version_ | 1783524080670998528 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Yiping Chen, Ruohua Wang, Yining Huang, Gan Xia, Qian Liu, Jianjun |
author_facet | Shi, Yiping Chen, Ruohua Wang, Yining Huang, Gan Xia, Qian Liu, Jianjun |
author_sort | Shi, Yiping |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Application of (18)F(-)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in urological oncology was relatively slowly due to the urinary elimination of (18)F-FDG. We investigated whether delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for diagnosing renal pelvic cancer. Methods: 51 patients were included who underwent delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting renal pelvic space-occupying lesions. The comparations of delayed PET/CT parameters and clinical characteristics between renal pelvic cancer and benign polyp were investigated. Results: Among the 51 patients, 47 were found to have renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma, and 4 had benign polyp. ROC analysis identified the lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 6.2 as the optimal cut-off value to distinguish from renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma to benign polyp. With the SUVmax cut-off of 6.2, the sensitivity, and specificity for predicting of renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma were 91.5% (43/47), and 100% (4/4). We also found a significant difference in tumor size between the positive (SUVmax > 6.2) and negative (SUVmax ≤ 6.2) PET groups in renal pelvic cancers. In patients with tumor size < 1.1 cm, the probability of being in the negative PET group was 75%. In such patients, a substantial proportion of renal pelvic cancer demonstrated negative SUVmax similar to that in patients with benign polyp. Conclusion: Delayed (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for differentiating renal pelvic cancer from benign polyp. In patients with small tumor size, renal pelvic cancer may present low (18)F-FDG uptake, mimicking the metabolic phenotypes of patients with benign polyp. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7171487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71714872020-04-23 Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer Shi, Yiping Chen, Ruohua Wang, Yining Huang, Gan Xia, Qian Liu, Jianjun J Cancer Research Paper Background: Application of (18)F(-)fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) in urological oncology was relatively slowly due to the urinary elimination of (18)F-FDG. We investigated whether delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for diagnosing renal pelvic cancer. Methods: 51 patients were included who underwent delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting renal pelvic space-occupying lesions. The comparations of delayed PET/CT parameters and clinical characteristics between renal pelvic cancer and benign polyp were investigated. Results: Among the 51 patients, 47 were found to have renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma, and 4 had benign polyp. ROC analysis identified the lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 6.2 as the optimal cut-off value to distinguish from renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma to benign polyp. With the SUVmax cut-off of 6.2, the sensitivity, and specificity for predicting of renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma were 91.5% (43/47), and 100% (4/4). We also found a significant difference in tumor size between the positive (SUVmax > 6.2) and negative (SUVmax ≤ 6.2) PET groups in renal pelvic cancers. In patients with tumor size < 1.1 cm, the probability of being in the negative PET group was 75%. In such patients, a substantial proportion of renal pelvic cancer demonstrated negative SUVmax similar to that in patients with benign polyp. Conclusion: Delayed (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be used for differentiating renal pelvic cancer from benign polyp. In patients with small tumor size, renal pelvic cancer may present low (18)F-FDG uptake, mimicking the metabolic phenotypes of patients with benign polyp. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7171487/ /pubmed/32328179 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.44512 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Shi, Yiping Chen, Ruohua Wang, Yining Huang, Gan Xia, Qian Liu, Jianjun Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer |
title | Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer |
title_full | Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer |
title_fullStr | Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer |
title_short | Delayed post-diuretic (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer |
title_sort | delayed post-diuretic (18)f-fdg pet/ct for preoperative evaluation of renal pelvic cancer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328179 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.44512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiyiping delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer AT chenruohua delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer AT wangyining delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer AT huanggan delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer AT xiaqian delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer AT liujianjun delayedpostdiuretic18ffdgpetctforpreoperativeevaluationofrenalpelviccancer |