Cargando…

Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach

BACKGROUND: e-Bug, an educational health website for teachers and students, aims to help control antibiotic resistance by educating young people about microbes, hygiene, and antibiotic resistance, reducing the incidence of infection and, therefore, the need for antibiotics. The teachers’ section of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allison, Rosalie, Hayes, Catherine, Young, Vicki, McNulty, Cliodna A M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32203932
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14504
_version_ 1783524096351404032
author Allison, Rosalie
Hayes, Catherine
Young, Vicki
McNulty, Cliodna A M
author_facet Allison, Rosalie
Hayes, Catherine
Young, Vicki
McNulty, Cliodna A M
author_sort Allison, Rosalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: e-Bug, an educational health website for teachers and students, aims to help control antibiotic resistance by educating young people about microbes, hygiene, and antibiotic resistance, reducing the incidence of infection and, therefore, the need for antibiotics. The teachers’ section of the e-Bug website has not been evaluated since it was launched in 2009, and worldwide page views have been steadily decreasing since 2013. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to apply GoodWeb, a comprehensive framework utilizing methodologies and attributes that are relevant to the digital era, to evaluate and suggest improvements to the e-Bug website. METHODS: Electronic questionnaires and face-to-face completion of task scenarios were used to assess content, ease of use, interactivity, technical adequacy, appearance, effectiveness, efficiency, and learnability of the teachers’ section of the e-Bug website. RESULTS: A total of 106 teachers evaluated the e-Bug website; 97.1% (103/106) of them reported that they would use e-Bug, and 98.1% (104/106) of them reported that they would recommend it to others. Participants thought that there was a niche for e-Bug because of the way the resources fit into the national curriculum. Suggestions for improvements included changing the menu indication by highlighting the current page or deactivating links, improving home page indication, and providing a preview of resources when hovering the mouse over hyperlinks. Additional features requested by users included a search function and access to training opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reports that the GoodWeb framework was successfully applied to evaluate the e-Bug website, and therefore, it could be used to guide future website evaluations in other fields. Results from this study will be used to appraise the current quality and inform any future changes, modifications, and additions to e-Bug.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7171564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71715642020-04-28 Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach Allison, Rosalie Hayes, Catherine Young, Vicki McNulty, Cliodna A M JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: e-Bug, an educational health website for teachers and students, aims to help control antibiotic resistance by educating young people about microbes, hygiene, and antibiotic resistance, reducing the incidence of infection and, therefore, the need for antibiotics. The teachers’ section of the e-Bug website has not been evaluated since it was launched in 2009, and worldwide page views have been steadily decreasing since 2013. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to apply GoodWeb, a comprehensive framework utilizing methodologies and attributes that are relevant to the digital era, to evaluate and suggest improvements to the e-Bug website. METHODS: Electronic questionnaires and face-to-face completion of task scenarios were used to assess content, ease of use, interactivity, technical adequacy, appearance, effectiveness, efficiency, and learnability of the teachers’ section of the e-Bug website. RESULTS: A total of 106 teachers evaluated the e-Bug website; 97.1% (103/106) of them reported that they would use e-Bug, and 98.1% (104/106) of them reported that they would recommend it to others. Participants thought that there was a niche for e-Bug because of the way the resources fit into the national curriculum. Suggestions for improvements included changing the menu indication by highlighting the current page or deactivating links, improving home page indication, and providing a preview of resources when hovering the mouse over hyperlinks. Additional features requested by users included a search function and access to training opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: This paper reports that the GoodWeb framework was successfully applied to evaluate the e-Bug website, and therefore, it could be used to guide future website evaluations in other fields. Results from this study will be used to appraise the current quality and inform any future changes, modifications, and additions to e-Bug. JMIR Publications 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7171564/ /pubmed/32203932 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14504 Text en ©Rosalie Allison, Catherine Hayes, Vicki Young, Cliodna A M McNulty. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 06.04.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Allison, Rosalie
Hayes, Catherine
Young, Vicki
McNulty, Cliodna A M
Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach
title Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach
title_full Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach
title_fullStr Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach
title_short Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach
title_sort evaluation of an educational health website on infections and antibiotics in england: mixed methods, user-centered approach
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32203932
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14504
work_keys_str_mv AT allisonrosalie evaluationofaneducationalhealthwebsiteoninfectionsandantibioticsinenglandmixedmethodsusercenteredapproach
AT hayescatherine evaluationofaneducationalhealthwebsiteoninfectionsandantibioticsinenglandmixedmethodsusercenteredapproach
AT youngvicki evaluationofaneducationalhealthwebsiteoninfectionsandantibioticsinenglandmixedmethodsusercenteredapproach
AT mcnultycliodnaam evaluationofaneducationalhealthwebsiteoninfectionsandantibioticsinenglandmixedmethodsusercenteredapproach